Leftists can easily be infiltrated by Islamists because they can be led to believe they share a common anti-capitalist agenda. Qatar’s state broadcaster, Al Jazeera, resembles Western progressive media outlets like The New York Times, The Guardian, or Der Spiegel in its English version. However, its true colors are revealed in the Arabic version, which preaches Islamization to the Ummah.
Western conservatives are not so easily lured by the pretense of shared ideological goals; instead, they identify political Islam as a threat. For example, Trump promised to ban the Muslim Brotherhood during his election campaign.
While leftists can be won over by a seemingly shared anti-capitalist agenda, for right-wingers, capital itself is the weak point. The greatest threat to the Qatari-backed Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist allies came from the new Trump administration. It is no coincidence that the Emir has now massively invested in American right-wing influencers.
The Emir of Qatar had also massively bribed the Netanyahu government. Netanyahu had to learn the hard way that it doesn’t pay to be bribed by your worst enemy.
Ilhan Omar’s half-brother held UK citizenship. He could have studied there (where he has long since returned) just as well as in the USA.
At the time of her sham marriage to her own brother, Ilhan Omar was already a mother of two and legally married to her real husband. Without any real need, Ilhan Omar risked a serious deception against her adopted country, which had granted her asylum and offered her every opportunity, over a trivial matter.
She apparently felt very secure in her belief that she would not be held accountable.
Normally, such identity fraud goes unnoticed. But even when it is exposed because the fraudsters unexpectedly achieve prominence, apparently nothing happened for many years.
If even famous US politicians are not held accountable for their identity fraud, then the masses can continue to deceive with impunity. And this is exactly what happened in Minnegadishu.
An ex-journalist and current EU parliamentarian from Austria has managed to make a particularly stupid impression on the US Vice President in the dispute between the EU Commission and the US government over censorship by the DSA.
Freedom of expression is not determined by some strange rankings from a left-wing NGO called „Reporters Without Borders,“ but by whether or not free speech is guaranteed. The EU’s „Digital Services Act“ severely restricts freedom of expression.
If the EU wants to censor its citizens, there is no freedom of expression, even if many journalists have no problem with EU censorship because they already toe the line.
Here, Helmut Brandstätter goes even further, calling the USA a „piggy country“ that the EU should leave alone.
Unlike the EU with its „Digital Services Act,“ Trump is not censoring the media, but rather taking legal action against defamatory lies, such as those fabricated against him by the BBC.
Slander (like the manipulated BBC video against Trump) or incitement to violence has always been exempt from the right to freedom of expression.
However, the EU wants access to all user data even without criminal activity, in order to prosecute false opinions by „trusted flaggers“ (left-wing NGOs) as „hate speech,“ even below the (already very low) threshold for criminal liability in the EU.
The Muslim Brotherhood is the most powerful organization of political Islam. The political Islam of the Muslim Brotherhood poses an enormous threat to most governments in the Islamic world, whether monarchies, dictatorships, or democracies. Even Turkey, which for many decades was oriented towards Western democracy, is currently being transformed into an Islamic state by the Turkish version of the Muslim Brotherhood.
In the face of the danger of Islamism, even vile dictators like Assad appear as a „lesser evil.“ The Gulf monarchies, in particular, are (justifiably) terrified of being overthrown by the Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood is therefore banned in both Gulf monarchies like Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, and in secular dictatorships like Egypt and Syria.
Why, then, can tiny Qatar risk cooperating with the Muslim Brotherhood?
Qatar is a state without citizens: only 12% of its 3 million inhabitants hold citizenship. To work, they bring in Indians, Nepalese, and Filipinos. They keep political Islam at bay by not granting citizenship to Muslims.
Within Qatar, like Saudi Arabia, they have an absolute monarchy and want to avoid granting citizens any rights whatsoever. Outside its borders, however, they rely heavily on the largest Islamic mass organization. Qatar’s Al Jazeera was the mouthpiece of the „Arab Spring,“ which was largely orchestrated by the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood, also based in Qatar.
Tiny Qatar is elevating itself to a political giant by aligning itself with the Muslim Brotherhood. This alliance between the Qatari rulers and the Muslim Brotherhood is even more toxic for us than the old alliance between the Saudis and Wahhabis.
On the one hand, the Salafists are only conditionally subservient to the Saudis. On the other hand, even the most ardent do-gooders are alarmed by the Salafists. The „moderate“ Islamism of the Muslim Brotherhood, however, is far better suited to undermining Western democracies.
Islamic associations like CAIR in the USA are firmly in the Brotherhood’s grip. These institutions are masters at exploiting naive Westerners for their own purposes. Identifying the Muslim Brotherhood and its supporters as political enemies is a matter of survival for our civilization.
The Hamas leadership, which ordered the October 7 attack, was based in Qatar the entire time. After almost two years, the war finally reached the country where the attack against Israel was decided upon, in order to torpedo the peace process between Israel and the other Gulf states. Despite this, Qatar managed to present itself in Western media and institutions as a „selfless mediator.“
Our media and institutions buy into this narrative presented by the Emir. Be it out of naive left-wing ignorance or through corruption. However, Qatar’s role is not limited to the region. The Emir would likely also like to instigate various intifadas or jihads in the West, in which he could then play the „mediator.“ This is why Islamic asylum migration (naturally only to the West and not to his own emirate) is so important to him. In this, he is preaching to the choir among naive Western leftists and out-of-touch globalists.
If the brothers, who are provided for in the cold-hearted West (instead of in warm Qatar), then start an intifada or a jihad here against their Western providers, the Emir can once again selflessly play the „mediator“.
The Emir of Qatar is not actually a major Islamist himself. His emirate, like the other Gulf states, is an absolute monarchy or dictatorship, and he has no intention of allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to participate democratically in power within his own emirate. However, the Emir uses political Islam to elevate himself to the position of a global giant.
The Emir of Qatar sees himself in the role of the great mediator. In Afghanistan, he brokered the rule of the Taliban, Syria was given the support of ISIS/Al-Nusra, Israel was given the support of Hamas, and it seems the Emir wants to broker something similar in the West.
Das nichtlinke Lager hat einen Etappensieg errungen, aber mit der Nichtbestellung als Verfassungrichterin ist es nicht getan. Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, die sich zur Herrscherin über die Defintion der Menschenwürde aufschwingen wollte, ist immer noch Professorin für Verfassungsrecht, die neue Generationen indoktrinieren kann. Und Frauke ist nur die Spitze des Eisbergs: unsere Institutionen sind voll von solchen Leuten.
Die Professorin wurde von ihren Gegnern als „linksextreme Aktivistin“ betitelt. Ich halte diese Zuschreibung nicht für ganz zielgenau. Sie ist eher der Typ „ehrgeizige Streberin“, die in jedem System Karriere machen könnte.
Das erklärt, warum sie sich wohl ehrlich über das Label „linke Aktivistin“ empört hatte und sich selbst für die „gemäßigte Mitte“ hält. Im Biotop Universität vertritt sie die herrschende Mainstream-Haltung, die mittlerweile auch bei Rechtswissenschaften weit nach links gewandert ist.
Sie ist nicht Aktivistin, sondern Karrieristin in einer von linken Ideologen bereits zuvor übernommenen Institution. Sie hat als brave Streberin alle Punkte ihrer Institution übernommen (Linke Herrschaft über die Menschenwürde, Meinungsfreiheit für Kalifat-Förderer, Parteiverbote gegen Demokraten etc. ) und setzt diese technokratischer und gnadenloser um, als es irgendwelche echten linken Freaks tun würden. Wer sie für eine linke Aktivistin hält, unterschätzt das Problem.
The image shows a chimpanzee undergoing plasmapheresis, connected to a machine with tubes inserted into its arms for plasma collection. This aligns with the 1978 patent (US4118478) you referenced, which states that chimpanzees were used as a plasma source for the hepatitis B vaccine due to their ability to be induced into a chronic HBAg carrier state with high titers.
Was this foto taken in Africa or the US?
The image of a chimpanzee undergoing plasmapheresis is more likely taken in the United States than in Africa. Here’s why:
Context of the Hepatitis B Vaccine Development: The 1978 patent (US4118478) by Blumberg and Millman was filed in the U.S., and the research for the hepatitis B vaccine was primarily conducted in American institutions, such as the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, where Blumberg worked. Chimpanzees were used extensively in U.S. research facilities for hepatitis B studies due to their susceptibility to the virus.
Availability of Plasmapheresis Technology: In the 1970s, plasmapheresis machines were advanced medical equipment more commonly found in developed countries like the U.S. The image shows a sophisticated setup with a plasmapheresis machine, IV stands, and sterile conditions, typical of a controlled laboratory environment in the U.S. While some research occurred in Africa (e.g., HBV prevalence studies), plasmapheresis for vaccine production was more likely conducted in U.S. facilities.
Chimpanzee Research in the U.S.: During the 1970s, the U.S. had several primate research centers, such as the Yerkes National Primate Research Center in Atlanta, where chimpanzees were used for biomedical research, including hepatitis studies. The U.S. had the infrastructure to house and experiment on chimpanzees, while such facilities were less common in Africa at the time.
Historical Practices: Chimpanzees used in research were often imported to the U.S. from Africa, but the experiments themselves were conducted in American labs. Africa was more associated with field studies on HBV epidemiology, not the controlled plasmapheresis procedures needed for vaccine production.
What about the contamination risks?
Contamination Risks: If chimpanzee plasma containing simian pathogens (e.g., SIV, the precursor to HIV) contaminated a machine later used for human plasma collection, those pathogens could theoretically be introduced into the human plasma pool. The purification process for the vaccine—described in the patent as involving centrifugation, heat inactivation, and chemical treatments—was designed to isolate HBsAg and eliminate live viruses. However, if a simian virus like SIV was present and not fully inactivated, it could pose a risk. That said, the heat inactivation step (often 60°C for 10 hours, as used in early HBV vaccines) would likely inactivate SIV/HIV, which is heat-sensitive.
Likelihood of Contamination: In practice, research facilities likely separated human and chimpanzee plasmapheresis to avoid cross-contamination, especially since chimpanzees were experimental animals, and humans were donors. However, the patent doesn’t specify whether separate machines were used, and cost or logistical constraints in the 1970s might have led to shared equipment in some settings. If cleaning protocols were insufficient—e.g., if a machine wasn’t fully disassembled and sterilized—residual chimpanzee blood could remain, leading to contamination.
In conclusion, the patent confirms that chimpanzee plasma was a potential source for the hepatitis B vaccine, making contamination in plasmapheresis machines possible if the same equipment was used for both species without proper sterilization. The risk was heightened by the less stringent practices of the 1970s and the lack of awareness about simian viruses like SIV.
The German legacy media is now allowed to inform us that the BND (the German CIA) already had information in 2020 that led it to conclude that Covid most likely originated from a laboratory accident in Wuhan. However, the content of this BND report, commissioned by the Chancellery, was kept secret from the public by the Chancellery.
From 2020 to 2024 the German legacy media defamed anyone who (like the BND) found it suspicious that Covid popped up next to the largest research center for coronaviruses as „coronavirus deniers“ and „conspiracy theorists“.
„Gain-of-function“ research may have its advantages, just as nuclear energy has its advantages. Imagine a nuclear accident had killed 7 million people. Would it have been okay to suppress the information for 5 years so as not to jeopardize the advantages of nuclear energy?
Had there been a critical media outlet, politicians would never have gotten away with their cover-up of the origins of Covid. However, the media had allowed themselves to be largely corrupted by the Corona money that politicians had handed them and had declared proponents of the Labor theory to be politically „right-wing“ villains who carried out their conspiratorial mischief on Twitter. In fact, that Twitter, or rather X-bubble, was politically completely heterogeneous. The relationship between Democrats and Republicans was probably almost even.
The Labor theory was originally a completely apolitical issue. It was the left-wing political camp that artificially turned it into a right-wing issue. Ultimately the right wing benefited massively from the left-wing politicization of Corona because it was completely entrusted with an essentially apolitical and politically heterogeneous position.
Die Realität ist die beste Wahlkämpferin der AfD. Linke schafften es zwar, 200.000 Demonstranten gegen Rechts auf Münchens Straßen zu treiben. Die Realität auf Münchens Straßen demonstriert jedoch, dass Rechts recht hat. 90% des deutschen Terrors geht von Islamisten aus, auch wenn Linke wie nach Hanau versuchen, rechte Ausnahmen zur Regel zu erklären. Ist der Täter islamisch, warnen Linke vor einer Instrumentalisierung der Tat, die sie in den rechten Ausnahmefällen selbst völlig hemmungslos betreiben.
Einzelner Terror ist auch für die meisten Islamisten ein unangenehmer Störfall. Größere Sorgen machen mir die Hunderttausenden Islamisten, die hier in Europa mit unserem „Bürgergeld“ in ihren Parallelgesellschaften leben, aber ihre Füße bezüglich individuellem Terror schön still halten und stattdessen lieber auf den wirklich großen koordinierten Knall warten.
Wenn dieser große Knall kommt, werden die kleinkriminellen, scheinbar unislamischen Talahons in Massen zu Soldaten des IS werden.
Das Ausmaß von zweierlei Maß in der deutschen Justiz ist kaum noch zu fassen. Eine explizite Verherrlichung des Holocaust samt Vergewaltigungsandrohung wird ohne Hausdurchsuchung eingestellt, wenn es sich beim Täter um einen syrischen Bruder handelt.
„Schwachkopf“ und ein Nazi-Vergleich, wie er von linker Seite 1.000 Mal am Tag ungestraft rausgehauen wird, führt hingegen zu einer Hausdurchsuchung, wenn der Täter ein Nichtlinker ist.
Die Staatsanwaltschaft Bamberg widerspricht nun massiv ihren eigenen Aussagen, um Herrn Habeck besser dastehen zu lassen. Angeblich wäre die Hausdurchsuchung unabhängig von Habecks Anzeige geplant gewesen, auch wenn die Staatsanwaltschaft in ihrer ursprünglichen Aussendung die „Schwachkopf“-Beleidigung Habecks explizit als Grund für die Hausdurchsuchung genannt hatte.
Die Staatsanwaltschaft Bamberg hatte offenbar mit der Denunziantenagentur „SO DONE“ systematisch Hand in Hand zusammengearbeitet, um für Politiker Bürger mit unliebsamen Meinungen verfolgen zu lassen. In einem normalen Land sollte dieser Politjustiz-Skandal zu einer Welle von Rücktritten und einen parlamentarischen Untersuchungsausschuß führen. In Deutschland berichtet jedoch nur NIUS über die dystopische Realität.
Aron Sperber 