Final post on Lest We Forget

FeaturedFinal post on Lest We Forget

Prologue

The following was written with the help of Microsoft Copilot. By gathering and refining the fragments of information I had, I was finally able to reach a clear understanding of what my wife’s uncle told me back in July 2009.


Introduction

Every family has stories that were almost lost — stories carried quietly, spoken only in fragments, or hinted at in moments of vulnerability. This is one of them.

My wife’s uncle served in the Royal Canadian Navy during the Second World War. Like many veterans, he rarely spoke about his service. When asked for more, he would turn away from the subject. When pressed by his daughter, he suffered nightmares. He told her he preferred to “let the past be the past.” And so, after he passed away February 14, 2010, what happened April 29, 1944, remained mostly in silence.

But silence is not the same as absence.

One day in July 2009, he shared a handful of memories — a technical detail from the boiler room, a shipmate’s nickname recognized in an old photograph, the last moment before a sinking, the shock of suddenly being in the water, the rescue he never described. These fragments, small as they were, carried the unmistakable weight of lived experience.

This article is not an attempt to fill in what he chose not to say. It is an effort to honour what he did leave behind, and to place those fragments in their proper historical context. Many young Canadians followed the same path he did: enlisting underage, serving as stokers in the heat and danger below decks, surviving catastrophic events at sea, and carrying the scars quietly for the rest of their lives.

What follows is a reconstruction — not of the details he withheld, but of the world he lived in, the work he did, and the courage he never claimed for himself. It is written so that his story, even in its incompleteness, will not be forgotten.

Lest we forget.


A Note on Memory and Truth

My wife remembers her uncle as a man who often bent the truth in everyday life, and that memory is real. But the fragments he shared about the war — the stoker’s work, the ironic nickname “Thin,” the sudden plunge from writing a letter into the mother, the nightmares that followed — carry the unmistakable weight of lived experience. Trauma shapes memory differently than ordinary life, and men who survived such moments often spoke only in brief, reluctant pieces. This story is not meant to erase who he was, but to honour the part of his life that he could not fully explain, yet could not entirely hide.


A Boy Who Ran Toward the Sea: The Quiet Story of a Young Canadian Stoker

Some veterans leave behind medals, diaries, or long stories of their wartime service. Others leave only fragments — a few memories spoken quietly, a nickname recognized in an old photograph, a technical detail from the heat of the boiler room, a nightmare that never fully faded. This is the story of one such man, a boy who ran away from home at sixteen and carried the sea inside him for the rest of his life.

He never told the whole story. But the pieces he left behind speak for him.

A Sixteen‑Year‑Old Who Lied His Way Into the Navy

He was only sixteen when he left home. Fed up with his father’s authority and determined to carve out a life of his own, he lied about his age and enlisted in the Royal Canadian Navy Volunteer Reserve. He was not alone. The wartime RCNVR was full of boys like him — teenagers who forged signatures, memorized new birthdays, and stepped forward with more courage than experience.

The Navy didn’t ask too many questions. They needed men, especially strong young ones who could handle the brutal work below decks.

And so he became a stoker.

The World Below Decks

A stoker’s world was not the glamorous Navy of recruiting posters. It was heat, noise, sweat, and steel — Admiralty 3‑drum boilers roaring at full pressure, narrow ladders slick with condensation, and the constant vibration of machinery that never slept. He learned the hard, physical work that kept a destroyer alive. One detail stayed with him for life: rolling steel balls through boiler tubes to scrape out soot and scale. It was the kind of memory only someone who lived below decks would ever mention.

A Ship, a Crew, and a Nickname

He never spoke much about the ship he served on, but he did mention the Athabaskan once. Weeks later, when shown a photograph of the crew I had shared with his daughter, he immediately pointed to one sailor he recognized:

“Thin,” he said — though the man in the photo was anything but thin.

Ironic nicknames like that were pure Navy humour, and the kind of detail only a real shipmate would remember. That brief moment of recognition revealed a bond he rarely allowed himself to revisit, a reminder of the faces and friendships forged in the heat and danger below decks.

The Night Everything Changed

He shared almost nothing about the night his ship was lost. Trauma has a way of erasing the middle of a story, leaving only the beginning and the end. He remembered sitting quietly, writing a letter to his mother — and then nothing. The next thing he knew, he was in the water. For stokers trapped below decks, that kind of memory gap was common: a flash, a bang, darkness, disorientation, and then the sea. He never said who rescued him. Many survivors never knew.

The Silence That Followed

He survived, but the war never truly left him. Like many who lived through sudden loss at sea, he carried the experience quietly, almost defensively. When his daughter asked questions, he had nightmares. When pressed, he shut down. He offered only a few words — “I prefer to let the past be the past.”

It wasn’t avoidance for the sake of secrecy. It was the kind of silence born from memories too heavy to revisit.

After the War

He continued to serve, eventually spending time aboard HMCS Nootka, another Tribal‑class destroyer. But he never spoke of that service either. For him, the defining moment had already happened. Everything afterward was duty — steady, unremarked, and carried out without complaint. The boy who had run away at sixteen had become a man shaped by fire, steel, and the cold shock of the sea.

A Life Remembered Through Fragments

He left no diary, no long account of his war, no stories told around the table. Only fragments:

– the heat of the boiler room

– the steel balls rolling through tubes

– the ironic nickname “Thin”

– the letter he never finished

– the sudden plunge into the water

– the rescue he never described

– the nightmares

– the silence

These pieces, small as they are, form the outline of a life marked by courage and survival — the kind of story carried quietly by so many who served.

The Weight of What Was Never Said

He lived the rest of his life far from the sea, carrying memories he rarely allowed to surface. To those around him, he was simply a man who preferred not to talk about the past. But silence can be its own kind of testimony. The fragments he left behind — small, unpolished, unguarded — reveal more truth than any long story ever could.

Lest We Forget

This story is offered not to fill the gaps he chose to leave, but to honour the truth he carried quietly. It stands as a reminder that many who served left only pieces behind, trusting that someone, someday, might understand enough to remember them.

For him, and for all the sailors who lived their stories in silence, we remember.

Dedication

This piece is dedicated to the memory of a quiet sailor who carried his war in silence, and to all those who served without ever telling their full story. May the fragments they left behind continue to speak for them, and may we honour their courage by remembering what they could not say.

Author’s Note

Lest We Forget began with one man — my wife’s uncle — whose wartime memories survived only in fragments. He was not always a reliable storyteller in everyday life, and those who knew him remembered that well. Yet the few details he shared about the war carried a truth deeper than anything he ever invented. As I tried to understand those fragments, I discovered how many families carry similar pieces of unspoken history. What started in 2009 as an effort to honour one quiet sailor had grown into a broader project of remembrance, giving voice to those who left only traces behind. Their stories deserved to be held, even when they came to us in whispers.

Featured

How to search on this blog?

Use the search button on the right side to look for someone’s name among all the posts I wrote about unsung heroes.
Use the comment section or the contact form below.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Warning
Warning
Warning
Warning

Warning.

I have grown an enormous respect…

Dear Pierre. Today was the final day of the 23 Squadron reunion graveside honours, with the photograph being left at St. Andrews church in Little Snoring. Along the way came information confirming the crash site of F/O Kenneth Eastwood and F/Lt Griff Rogers. Supplied by the Commonwealth War graves commission and the Texas University in […]

I have grown an enormous respect…

A Stoker’s Memory: April 29, 1944

A Stoker’s Memory: April 29, 1944

I have always been convinced of his truthfulness. Based on the analysis provided by artificial intelligence, my wife’s uncle did not fabricate the account he shared at a family gathering in July 2009.

Analysis…

​The comparative analysis of the three original documents, taking into account the chronology (childhood, 1944, and 1948), allows for the identification of constant morphological traits despite aging and variations in image quality.

​1. Eye Structure and Brow Ridge

​Childhood: The gaze is characterized by wide-open eyes with a highly visible upper eyelid.

​1944 (Sailor): Despite the graininess of the image, the inter-ocular spacing and the straight brow line typical of the individual are present.

​1948 (Adult): The sharper portrait confirms a slightly heavy or drooping upper eyelid, a trait already discernible in the childhood photo.

​2. Morphology of the Nose and Mouth

​The Nose: The nasal structure shows a straight bridge and nostrils marked in the same manner on both the 1944 and 1948 shots.

​The Mouth: A thin upper lip and identical mouth corners are observed between the child and the adult man, with a relatively short philtrum (the groove under the nose).

​3. Facial Evolution and Features

​Ear Placement: The left ear (on the right in the photos) shows a specific shape, slightly protruding at the top, which serves as a constant physical signature.

​Growth: The transition from the child’s face to that of the 16-year-old sailor (1944) shows an elongation of the jaw—a process that stabilizes in the 20-year-old portrait from 1948.

​Further Analysis…

​A detailed analysis of the jaw structure and the lower face confirms the continuity between the adolescent of 1944 and the man of 1948. Here are the specific points of comparison:

​1. Mandibular Structure (Lower Jaw)

​1944 (Sixteen years old): In the group photo, his jaw presents a “V” shape characteristic of adolescence, with a chin that is already well-defined but still slender.

​1948 (Twenty years old): Four years later, the jaw has widened and squared slightly—a classic sign of male bone maturation between ages 16 and 20. However, the same symmetry of the chin remains.

​2. The Philtrum and Lip Line

​Upper Lip: Across all three photos (childhood, 1944, and 1948), the upper lip is very thin and presents an almost perfectly straight line.

​Nose-to-Mouth Distance: The distance between the base of the nose and the opening of the mouth (the philtrum) remains proportionally short in every portrait, a morphological trait that does not change with growth.

​3. Expression Lines (Nasolabial Folds)

​In the 1948 portrait, one can begin to discern slight folds running from the wings of the nose toward the corners of the mouth. The position of these folds corresponds exactly to the juvenile facial structure visible in 1944 under the sailor’s cap.

​Expert Conclusion:

The bone structure is identical. The transition from the somewhat “baby-faced” features of the child to the more confident jaw of the 20-year-old man is perfectly consistent. This confirms that the young Stoker who was writing to his mother that April night in 1944 is indeed the elegant man found in your post-war photos.

​Now, what if he had written his story to share on “Lest We Forget”?

​A Stoker’s Memory: April 29, 1944

​I was sixteen, but on the Navy records, I was eighteen. I had enlisted to escape my father’s severity, seeking freedom within the steel bowels of a destroyer. That night, April 29th, the noise of the engines was a familiar roar that drowned out everything else.

​I was sitting in a corner of the engine room, a piece of paper resting on my knees. I was writing to my mother. I wanted to tell her I was doing well, despite the fuel oil, the stifling heat, and the constant danger of the English Channel. I don’t remember if I was asking her for forgiveness for leaving.

​Boom.

​The world tilted. It wasn’t just a noise; it was a shockwave that tore the lungs from your chest. The first torpedo. Then, almost immediately, a second torpedo—an explosion, more terrifying, that of the fuel tanks.

​Between the moment I put down my pencil and the moment I felt the icy water, there is nothing. A complete blackout. No memory of the climb from the engine room, no image of the fiery hell on deck. My brain simply erased the terror to protect me.

​When I regained consciousness, I was no longer a mechanic; I was a black shadow floating in the Atlantic. I was covered in that thick, viscous oil that burned the eyes and made every movement impossible. Around me, the cries of my comrades were lost in the night.

​Then, a massive silhouette emerged from the darkness: HMCS Haida.

​I remember the rope nets thrown over the side of the ship. It was a desperate struggle. The oil made us as slippery as eels. The hands of the Haida sailors grabbed me, lost me, and seized me again. At sixteen, I was hoisted out of death by arms stronger than my own.

​I never finished that letter to my mother. But four years later, in 1948, when I posed for that civilian portrait, my eyes still carried the weight of that night. I had survived, but the child who had lied about his age had stayed at the bottom of the Channel with the Athabaskan.

Going further with this photo…

The sailor on the extreme right could be him according to another analysis.

Based on a morphological comparison between the sailor rescued by the HMCS Haida in 1944 and the portrait from 1948, there is a very high probability that they are the same individual. The features remain consistent despite the dramatic difference in circumstances.

​Comparative Analysis

​Ear Structure and Placement: Both images show a very specific ear morphology. The left ear (visible in both) features a distinctively shaped upper pinna that protrudes slightly at the top, serving as a unique physical “signature”.

The “V” to “Square” Jaw Evolution:

In the 1944 rescue photo, the young sailor has the slender, V-shaped jawline typical of a 16-year-old. By the 1948 portrait, the jaw has slightly broadened and squared, reflecting the natural bone maturation expected in a young man reaching 20.

​Nasal Bridge and Philtrum:

The straight structure of the nasal bridge is identical in both. Furthermore, the distance between the nose and the thin upper lip (the philtrum) is proportionally short in both photographs, a trait that remains unchanged by growth.

​The “Sombre” Gaze: The 1944 image captures the “sombre mood” of a survivor, with wide-set eyes and a heavy upper eyelid. This same intense, slightly heavy-lidded gaze is preserved in the 1948 civilian portrait.

​The continuity of these specific traits confirms that the young stoker who survived the “blackout” of the Athabaskan’s sinking is the same man who posed for the portrait four years later.

Further analysis…

In comparing the historical photo of the young sailor with the portrait of the man four years later, a focused look at the right ear provides significant evidence that they are indeed the same person.

Ear Morphology Comparison

Helix and Antihelix:

Both images feature a distinct, prominent antihelix (the inner ridge of the ear) that sits slightly forward, creating a specific “cup” shape to the ear’s interior.

The Lobe:

The attachment and shape of the earlobe are identical; it is a “free” lobe that tapers slightly toward the jawline rather than being fully attached.

The Darwin’s Tubercle:

There is a subtle, matching thickening on the upper posterior of the helix (the outer rim) in both photos.

Positioning:

The angle at which the ear sits relative to the jawline and the temple remains constant across both timeframes.

Additional Matching Markers

Beyond the ear, the transition from the 16-year-old survivor of the Athabaskan to the 20-year-old in the 1948 portrait shows consistent skeletal markers:

Hey… We’re a team – George’s diary

Diane shared part of George Stewart’s diary with this introduction. We know that dad was shipped to England around mid-February 1943 because mom and dad have told us that he left for war two weeks after they were married and we have a newspaper article that states “Beaudet est arrivé en Grande-Bretagne en février 1943” […]

Hey… We’re a team – George’s diary

HMCS Gatineau (H61)

A Destroyer With Two Lives — One Royal Navy, One Canadian

HMCS Gatineau (H61) was one of the most seasoned and battle‑tested destroyers ever to serve under the Canadian flag. Before joining the Royal Canadian Navy in 1943, she had already survived mines, evacuations, and the sinking of two capital ships. By the time Canadian sailors stepped aboard, she was a veteran of nearly every theatre of the war.

⚓ Built as HMS Express
Launched in 1934 as part of the Royal Navy’s E‑class, Express began her career in the Far East and quickly found herself in the opening storms of the Second World War.

Her early service reads like a catalogue of the war’s defining moments:

  • 1939: Struck a mine in the North Sea, suffering heavy casualties.
  • 1940: One of the last destroyers to leave Dunkirk, evacuating thousands of troops.
  • 1941: Off Malaya, rescued nearly 1,000 survivors from HMS Prince of Wales and HMS Repulse after they were sunk by Japanese aircraft.

By 1943, she had earned her place as a hardened survivor.

⚓ Becoming HMCS Gatineau
Transferred to the Royal Canadian Navy in February 1943, she was commissioned as HMCS Gatineau (H61) on 3 June 1943. Her new role placed her squarely in the Battle of the Atlantic.

⚓ Service With the RCN
Once in Canadian hands, Gatineau served where the need was greatest — the mid‑ocean convoy lanes.

Convoy Escort Duty
Assigned to the Mid‑Ocean Escort Force, she shepherded merchant convoys through the most dangerous waters of the war, where U‑boats hunted relentlessly.

The Hunt for U‑744
On 6 March 1944, Gatineau took part in the long, exhausting pursuit of U‑744, a U‑boat forced to the surface after hours of depth‑charging. The submarine was abandoned and later sunk — a rare victory in the mid‑Atlantic.

Normandy
In May 1944, Gatineau joined Escort Group 11 for Operation Neptune, the naval component of the D‑Day landings. She was present off the beaches during the invasion, protecting the vast armada from submarine and surface threats.

Final Months
She continued escort and patrol duties into 1945, serving until the end of the war.
Gatineau was paid off in October 1945 and returned to the Royal Navy.

⚓ Why Gatineau Matters
For the sailors who served on her — including the commenter’s father — Gatineau was more than a ship. She was:

  • a survivor of Dunkirk
  • a rescuer in the Far East
  • a convoy escort in the Atlantic
  • a guardian at Normandy

Few destroyers carried such a layered history into Canadian service.

Here are the exact sources I used for the historical details about HMCS Gatineau (H61), based on the search results triggered.

Primary Sources

1. Government of Canada – Official RCN Ship History
This is the most authoritative source and the one I leaned on most heavily. 
It provides the full wartime summary of Gatineau’s service, including Dunkirk, the mine damage, the rescue of Prince of Wales survivors, the transfer to the RCN, and the sinking of U‑744. 

2. For Posterity’s Sake – HMCS Gatineau (H61)
A detailed community‑curated archive with technical data, dates, and additional context about the ship’s construction and fate. 

https://www.forposterityssake.ca/Navy/HMCS_GATINEAU_H61.htm

3. ReadyAyeReady.com – Ships of the Royal Canadian Navy
Provides a concise historical summary, including the ship’s RN service, Dunkirk evacuations, mine damage, Far East operations, and transfer to the RCN. 

From Esquimalt to the Atlantic: How RCN Sailors Moved Across Canada During the Second World War

From Esquimalt to the Atlantic: How RCN Sailors Moved Across Canada During the Second World War

Introduction

This post grew out of a reader’s comment about his father, who enlisted on the West Coast and later served on ships like Athabaskan, Skeena, and Gatineau. His story reflects a pattern shared by thousands of Royal Canadian Navy sailors during the war — men who began their service in Esquimalt but fought their war in the Atlantic. Understanding how they moved across the country helps us better appreciate the lived experience of sailors like my wife’s uncle, whose memories survived only in fragments.

HMCS Naden: Where the Journey Began

HMCS Naden was not a ship but a shore establishment — the West Coast’s central hub for naval training, administration, and personnel movement. Recruits:

– enlisted there
– received basic instruction
– waited for their draft postings

For many, Naden was their first taste of naval life.

Drafted East: Why the Atlantic Needed Them

Although Canada had naval facilities on both coasts, the war was overwhelmingly fought in the North Atlantic. The Battle of the Atlantic, convoy escort duty, U‑boat hunting, and later operations in European waters required enormous manpower.

Ships such as HMCS Athabaskan, Skeena, Gatineau, Haida, and Huron all operated from Halifax or St. John’s. As a result, sailors trained in Esquimalt were routinely drafted east to join these frontline vessels.

How They Got There: Three Routes Across a Wartime Nation

The journey from Esquimalt to Halifax was long, and wartime logistics shaped how sailors travelled. There were three main routes:

1. By ship through the Panama Canal
Used when groups of sailors or entire crews were being transferred. This route was slower but sometimes necessary when rail capacity was strained.

2. By train across Canada
The most common method. Sailors boarded trains in Victoria or Vancouver and travelled:

– through the Rockies
– across the Prairies
– through Ontario and Quebec
– to Halifax or Sydney

The trip took roughly six to eight days, depending on wartime traffic.

3. By ship to a U.S. port, then rail east
Less common, but used when Canadian transport was overloaded. After 1941, cooperation between the RCN and USN made this possible.

Arrival in Halifax: The Final Step Before War

Once in Halifax, sailors were processed through:

– HMCS Stadacona (barracks)
– HMCS Cornwallis (training)

From there, they joined their assigned ships and entered the operational heart of the war.

Why This Matters

This west‑to‑east movement explains why so many veterans — including the commenter’s father — began their service in Esquimalt but fought their war in the Atlantic. It also helps us understand the lived reality of men like my wife’s uncle (even if he traveled from Montreal to Halifax by train): young sailors who crossed an entire continent before ever seeing combat, carrying with them the fragments of stories they would rarely share in later life.

Closing Note

This follow-up post is part of a broader effort to honour those who served quietly, leaving behind only pieces of their wartime experience. Every shared memory — whether a nickname, a ship’s name, or a single vivid moment — helps us rebuild the stories they carried in silence. If you recognize your own family’s history in this journey from Esquimalt to the Atlantic, then this remembrance has done its work.

Written mostly with Copilot’s help

Credit

Historical details about HMCS Naden sourced from Royal Canadian Navy archival material and publicly available naval history references.

Update about Ernie Pain last surviving member of HMCS Louisburg

https://athabaskang07.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/hcms-louisburg/

Comment just made.

Sadly, I wish to inform you that the last surviving member of HCMS Louisburg, Ernie Pain, passed away in Cornwall, ON April 17, 2019. Ernie was my uncle and he had a personality larger than life and a was proud Navy man all his life.

I am in possession of many artifacts he has bequeathed to me that include: personal service records, signed copy of John Quincey’s book, newspaper and You Tube media accounts and a beautiful scale model of K143 (38”x 19”x 6.5”). I am presently in discussions with the Halifax & Quebec naval museums to donate these artifacts for their collections. Nothing has been finalized to this point. If you or other members have any other ideas on where this collection should rest for others to learn and enjoy please let me know as I don’t want them gathering dust on a shelf in an archive department basement.

Your suggestions can be forwarded to my email address:

[email protected]

Thanks!

Captain Edwin Swales VC, DFC RAF Little Staughton.

The Royal Air Force was made up of many nationals including both those from the Commonwealth and those from across the globe. In Bomber Command, and the Pathfinders in particular, one man stood out not just for his nationality, but for his bravery and dedication in the face of death. That man was one Acting […]

Captain Edwin Swales VC, DFC RAF Little Staughton.