Two recent posts over on Cards & Feather’s blog is really helping me crystalize some things I haven’t really sat down & thought about with this much clarity, so I”m rolling with it.
Their first post touches on the concept of “favor” and whether and how much it has to do in Kemetism: https://cardsandfeather.wordpress.com/2015/09/12/reaping-what-you-sow-does-religion-reward-even-if-it-doesnt/
I think because Kemetic religion relies on an active reestablishment of connection between the worlds, that the gods may be more *aware* of worshippers who pump more connection out there.
How it works with “favor” and intervention in general I think is…I do think the netjeru can effect things that aren’t outside of ma’ats ruling. Like they can influence you to drop your keys and find $20 in the grass, but it is a matter of ma’at whether you use it to buy drugs or donate to charity so they need to defer to will. They can throw a few pamphlets at you if they’re really determined, but ultimately the choice is yours because it’s the governed and under jurisdiction of this fundamental universal structure. I also think you can pray to them for clarity and suggestions in a situation, say choosing a job, and that this can be effective in improving your own perception, and they can even aid in with a perception for your benefit based on the universal order that doesn’t encroach upon it. (Hold on to those words a bit.) They aren’t omniscient unlike monotheistic faiths, though; they might have a view of what may seem to be the best outcome, for you and for your ma’at, but they would not necessarily know if the subway is going to derail on your way there, nor do I think saying ‘it was the disapproval of the netjeru” to explain such a death is valid. I’m sure the netjeru who’d helped you would be just as surprised at the outcome, being that it’s based on someone else’s decision to speed or fudge an inspection until they became aware it had happened.
The keyword that came up a lot in my mind, and in Card & Feather’s second related post: https://cardsandfeather.wordpress.com/2015/09/12/piety-relationships-and-what-if-i-make-it-all-up/
Is Perception. And that and awareness is the philosophical key to it all these posts I think.
It all relates to sia. The gods’ intellegence is perceptive. Our way of connecting with the gods often is very often via our humanesque peceptions of them. We, humans and gods, enact connection with each other through sia. We perceive them as humanish most times when we think of them/direct our awareness/our own human sia to them. And once they are aware of us, which worship encourages and establishes, they perceive us with their divine intellegence which probably suggests to them how best to engage with our requests and with us as individuals. If we are given the intellegence of a deity, it is their sia, perceptive awareness. They may not give their sia, their perceptive, active/accute intelligence, to a person at any given time, (and likewise we get busy). We can know they exist and know them in our minds at any time from our own perception once an awareness has been actived, though, (and likewise them). And so I think sia is at the crux of how humans and gods know and interact with each other.
I don’t know if I explained myself well, and don’t feel like I really hit half of what’s bubbling. I didn’t wake up expecting to post a blog, and it’s half-thought. But sia, sia-sia-sia, it feels infinitely more important than is usually focused on and gone over, for all these questions and probably more.
Here is the Hendalogy page for Sia that I have my knowledge of it from: https://henadology.wordpress.com/theology/netjeru/sia/
Together with this comprehensive paragraph on it from “Daily Life of the Egyptian Gods” by Meeks (p. 95-96, not all included here b/c it’s long,) that got me thinking about how it might relate to human/netjer relationships:
“The special faculty that enabled the gods to perceive an event the instant it occurred, together with the reasons for its occurrence, was called sia. Sia embraced all the possible knowledge brought into existance by the act of creation. Only the creator himself comprehended this knowledge in it’s totality. […] This capacity, which every god possessed in some measure, was a dormant kind of knowledge that became active in the presence of the event that brought it out; it enabled a god to grasp, in the fullest sense of the word, what was going on. It made it possible for already existing knowledge, reactivated by a signal, to emerge at the conscious level. “Sign of recognition” that is the basic meaning of the word sia in Egyptian. Not to have sia of something (or someone) was thus not a matter of not knowing it, but rather of not being able, or of no longer being able, to recognize or identify it. […] Sia operated like an absolute intuition irreducible to logical knowledge.”
There’s so much in the concept and I can’t shake the feeling that it may be a pretty fundamental theological one.