I do not suffer from Autism, but I do suffer from the way you treat me.
Tyler Durdin
I would say this quote is appropriate for this post as this could be a tough read for those who have been on the end of a disability hate crime. But here is the definition of a disability hate crime below:
A disability hate crime is a criminal offense or incident that targets a person because of their disability. It can include violence, abuse, or property damage.
Disability hate crime has always been a hot topic, the definition, the lack of understanding or even the lack of help from not only the police but the courts mean that disability hate crime isn’t always recognised as such a thing. But why is that? The laws for disability rights only started gaining traction in the 1990s, only being taken seriously in the late 2000s, unrepairable damage having been done to people who suffered due to discrimination, hate and conspiracy theories of why such things existed.
When I was younger, I used to hear from my mother that my disabilities came from an injection. I never believed her, I always questioned her narrative of why she would say such a bullshit thing. It was a lonely world as I am part of that awkward generation where the law brought in 1995 existed that was meant to stop discrimination against disabled people but it didn’t protect those with learning disabilities such as autism, that came into play 15 years later in 2010.
The police have had a track record for not doing enough for the disabled community. I haven’t had great experiences with the police and I’m sure there are others who have stories about their experiences with them and how they were treated. There are so many papers with stats that come to similar conclusions that not many autistic or disabled people are satisfied with their experiences with the police and in a world where almost everything can be found online, hiding any type of discrimination or bad treatment of a disabled person can’t be hidden forever, someone will be filming even if unintentional, police have body cams, they can’t hide it on that even if they try.
The police are hypocrites. For a starters, their track record when it comes to discrimination of disabled people within their own ranks ain’t good. According to an article written by John Pring for http://www.disabilitynewsservice.com in March 2023, the Metropolitan Police were found that 1 in 3 disabled members of staff had faced bullying with 358 employment tribunals between 2017-18 and 2021-22 being related to disability discrimination. (I’ll share a link to this article near the end of this post to read, don’t worry, I’ll probably reference a few articles as I write this.)
Another article written by researchers at the University of Cambridge found some shocking numbers. The study found that only half of autistic people (52%) were considered by the police to be vulnerable adults, even though the law recognises all autistic people as vulnerable.
Over a third (35%) of autistic defendants were not given an ‘appropriate adult’ during police investigations, even though their diagnosis was known to police, and despite all autistic people being entitled under the law to have an appropriate adult present when being interviewed by the police. A further 18% did not have an ‘appropriate adult’ present because their diagnosis was not known to the police.
Only a quarter (25%) of autistic people were given ‘reasonable adjustments’, with 38% not given any even though lawyers stated that this would have been beneficial. This is despite all autistic people being entitled to reasonable adjustments under the law. A further 33% did not receive any adjustments because their autism diagnosis was unknown at the time. Of the autistic people whose case went to trial, more than one in five (22%) were not given any reasonable adjustments even though their lawyers stated that this would have been helpful.
In just under half of the cases that included a trial by jury (47%), the jury was not informed that the defendant was autistic. 59% of prosecution barristers and 46% of judges or magistrates said or did something during the trial that made them concerned that they did not have an adequate understanding of autism.
This alone is shocking. How is this being allowed to happen in a country where people are supposed to have equal rights? But there is a slight positive out of this. “However, a positive finding was that, in cases where their client was found to have committed a crime, 60% of judges saw the defendant’s autism as a mitigating factor, and in these cases the majority of autistic people were given a suspended or reduced sentence.”
I know this post was supposed to be about disability hate crimes but discrimination within the police has a role to play in how the investigations are handled. While the numbers are reportedly going down according to the Home Office, people also don’t report these crimes to the Police, which may not be fully surprising considering those who have dealt with the police when reporting such crimes. But there also articles that state the number is rising.
But for now, I will finish this post and if you want to read more, there are two articles linked that will help but you can also search:
https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/disability-discrimination-in-met-police-is-baked-into-the-system-says-report/
https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/autistic-defendants-are-being-failed-by-the-criminal-justice-system
Thank you for reading.
G2G,
Crazy World Online
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX