Two of the sources I found most useful in preparing are this AEI piece on the fiscal costs of immigration and this Pew report on the number of undocumented immigrants.
Thanks to those who have pressed me over the years to do more public engagement.
A long pondered but only lately realized blog about economics, politics, evaluation, econometrics, academia, college football and whatever else comes to mind.
Two of the sources I found most useful in preparing are this AEI piece on the fiscal costs of immigration and this Pew report on the number of undocumented immigrants.
Thanks to those who have pressed me over the years to do more public engagement.
Small, Mario Luis and Jessica McCrory Calarco. 2022. Qualitative Literacy: A Guide to Evaluating Ethnographic and Interview Research. University of California Press.
This (short) book lays out clear standards by which outsiders can judge the quality of qualitative empirical research in the social sciences. It has in mind in particular ethnographic work, in which the researcher embeds themselves into a context, thoughtfully observes, takes lots of notes, and then attempts to construct meaning from the notes. It also discusses, and applies the same conceptual framework to, research based on in-depth semi-structured interviews. I am a sometimes consumer of ethnographies and have often wished for a book like this one, as I, not at all surprisingly, never received any formal training in ethnographic methods along the way, though I could certainly rank the many ethnographies I have read over the years on some implicit quality scale.
The authors organize their book around the notions of cognitive empathy, heterogeneity, palpability, follow-up, and self-awareness. Cognitive empathy comes first, and has a special salience in polarized times when it seems deficient on all sides. But ethnographers really need it in a way that ordinary folk do not, for without it they can never hope to really understand their subjects. Heterogeneity basically means that if everyone in some group comes off as identical, then the ethnographer has done a bad job, in the sense that they have surely missed important features of those they purport to study. Palpability means sharing telling details rather than just offering generalities. Follow-up means investigating interesting bits as they come up during fieldwork (or in a long-form interview). Put differently, it means not rigidly adhering to some ex ante research plan. In qualitative work, as in quantitative work, the most interesting bits will sometimes be those that depart from the explicit or implicit "pre-analysis plan", which of course does not imply that the pre-analysis plan was not worth doing. And self-awareness means the researcher needs to thing about how they - their features and their words and their behavior - affect the content of their research.
Overall, a remarkably clear and concise guide. Nothing was super surprising to me, but I found the value-added from organizing the material into a clean conceptual framework and providing many examples both real and contrived quite large.
Recommended to consumers (and producers!) of qualitative research.
I ordered this book from the Seminary Coop Bookstore in Chicago.
Pipes, Richard. 2003. VIXI. Yale University Press.
I read Pipe's book "Survival is Not Enough" back in college. That book reinforced my own views on the Soviet Union, which were based in part on an in-person visit in 1979 as part of a broader European tour with a student group. Since then, I have purchased several of his books used, though this, his memoir, is the first I have managed to read.
His life divides rather neatly into a sequence of parts: growing up in Poland as a Jew, escape from Poland just in time, education in the United States, life as a Harvard professor, his time on the National Security Council during the Reagan administration, a somewhat different life (due to his higher public profile) back at Harvard after that, and then retirement. As with many academics, retirement for Pipes just means more time for research and less time spent on teaching and administration (there is a reason for the quip "I need to retire to get some work done" that one hears among economists).
I found the initial part about growing up in Poland in the 1920s and 1930s and then leaving (with a fair amount of uncertainty of success) for the United States and the part about his time in the Reagan administration the most interesting, perhaps because being a history professor is a lot like being an economics professor and I already know how that goes. The Poland and DC components read quite differently: the former basks in the glow of a gentle nostalgia, the latter bluntly settles a lot of scores. Pipes argues that he had real effects on policy and thereby helped speed the demise of the Soviet Union, surely a worthy life contribution for anyone.
I enjoyed the book a great deal, both as academic memoir and as history. Recommended.
I found this at some used bookstore somewhere, and not that long ago, but do not recall which one.
Angel, Katherine. 2022. Tomorrow Sex Will Be Good Again: Women and Desire in the Age of Consent. Verso.
The book presents a critique of current consent-based, heavily contracted norms regarding sexual interactions from what one might call a left-humanist perspective.
If that sounds like something you would find interesting, you'll like the book.
I purchased this book at the Dussman English Bookshop in Berlin. It has the virtue of being open quite late so that one can stop by on the way from from dinner.
McWhorter, John. 2021. Nine Nasty Words, English in the Gutter: Then, Now, and Forever. Avery Books.
John McWhorter teaches linguistics at Columbia. He also writes a column on language issues, broadly conceived, for the New York Times, and appears as a frequent guest on the Glenn Show podcast with economist Glenn Loury. Befitting his many accomplishments, he has a fine website.
I have read three of his books. The first was his book on black English, which I blogged about several years ago and quite liked. The second was his Woke Racism book, which I did not blog about and liked the least of the three.
The present book, as its title subtly suggests, concerns the etymology of nine English naughty words, a set that includes words related to religion, such as hell and damn, words related to bodily functions, and racial and other slurs. McWhorter makes the case (drawn from the literature) that the naughtiest of naughty words have evolved over time through the three categories.
The book delights in both substance and style. The histories of several of the naughty words exhibit wild twists and turns. Along with the summarizing (in most cases) the current consensus among linguists on these histories, McWhorter also elegantly dismisses various myths, such as one false origin story involving the instruction "ship high in transit." He demonstrates an amazing knowledge of pop culture references as well, ranging from obscure Broadway musicals of the past to episodes of the Jeffersons. And the wordplay ... ah the wordplay. So much fun. So many puns.
My only complaint, which I suspect most readers in his target audience of people who buy small books displayed at the check-out counter of their independent bookstore would not share, is that I would have liked more talk about how linguists came to believe the various etymologies he recounts. I did appreciate the books discussion of how hard it is to trace down the usage history of some of the words because back in the day people did not write them down, at least not in the sorts of ways that would survive to the present day.
In short, recommended. I liked it well enough that I bought a fourth McWhorter book when I finished this one.
Addendum: Fixed McWhorter's affiliation from Brown (that's Loury) to Columbia.