Sunday, September 21, 2014
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
Where'd you go, Bernadette?
by Maria Semple.
Recommended to me by the wise Loupbleu. Greatly enjoyed. I highly recommend.
Here is my favorite quote:
On a related note, I'm experimenting in thinking of myself as a creative person. So I'm trying to put together a book proposal, similar to the stuff I put up here (and to many of the posts I took down, partially to see if I could use them in a book).
Any title suggestions out there?
Recommended to me by the wise Loupbleu. Greatly enjoyed. I highly recommend.
Here is my favorite quote:
"Are you quite done? People like you must create. If you don’t create, Bernadette, you will become a menace to society."
On a related note, I'm experimenting in thinking of myself as a creative person. So I'm trying to put together a book proposal, similar to the stuff I put up here (and to many of the posts I took down, partially to see if I could use them in a book).
Any title suggestions out there?
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
Monday, June 23, 2014
Telegraph Avenue
Only for you would I have read "Telegraph Avenue", because I generally avoid anything having to do with birth or trauma on my time off. And, per expectations, I kind of hated it the first time through, because birth! trauma! midwifery politics! evil obstetricians! (Honestly, not one female OB, even though that's, like, statistically improbable these days.). But then I loved it, because Michael Chabon's language is just...fun. It's hard to read, for me, the first time through, because it's so very loaded. But then you puzzle it out and you laugh. I think this is how some people feel about poetry, right? And once you get past the birth trauma and his language play, his characters are great, too, so there's a lot reward there.
Anyway, I never would have read it either the first or subsequent times if not for your recommendation (was it Loupbleu?) and for The Bearded Economist, who read the recommendation and brough it home from the library. But it's really really good - so thank you.
----------------------------------
Speaking of comments: thanks for the rec, but I don't think the Skeptical OB is the right place for me. The best way I can think to describe it is that she is sort of the Bill O'Reilly of women's health discussion (lots of vitriol and dismissive statements, from what I can see). And I would like to be the Rachel Maddow? Or perhaps this metaphor breaks down. Regardless, the tone is all wrong for me. Thanks for the suggestions, though.
I just finished the c-section piece (note: I was gently corrected that cesarean birth is the preferred, and overall nicer terminology; did you know that?), and we'll see if the editor takes it.
Anyway, I never would have read it either the first or subsequent times if not for your recommendation (was it Loupbleu?) and for The Bearded Economist, who read the recommendation and brough it home from the library. But it's really really good - so thank you.
----------------------------------
Speaking of comments: thanks for the rec, but I don't think the Skeptical OB is the right place for me. The best way I can think to describe it is that she is sort of the Bill O'Reilly of women's health discussion (lots of vitriol and dismissive statements, from what I can see). And I would like to be the Rachel Maddow? Or perhaps this metaphor breaks down. Regardless, the tone is all wrong for me. Thanks for the suggestions, though.
I just finished the c-section piece (note: I was gently corrected that cesarean birth is the preferred, and overall nicer terminology; did you know that?), and we'll see if the editor takes it.
Thursday, May 8, 2014
Sunday, March 9, 2014
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Fluishly Yours
Dear ABOG;
Although I specifically set aside time this week to study for the upcoming MFM Oral boards, I hope you will accept, in lieu of passing that exam, this monograph entitled: "Care of the Sick Toddler(s) and Kindergartener: A Case of Cognitive Decline". Although not randomized, and an unethical experiment performed without IRB approval, I believe this study represents an important public health finding this winter, relevant to many parents of child-bearing age. It may even represent a delayed (2-5 years) form of postpartum depression. Of course, more research is needed; sadly, I seem to be deeply involved in advancing the field.
Feverishly yours,
Me
Although I specifically set aside time this week to study for the upcoming MFM Oral boards, I hope you will accept, in lieu of passing that exam, this monograph entitled: "Care of the Sick Toddler(s) and Kindergartener: A Case of Cognitive Decline". Although not randomized, and an unethical experiment performed without IRB approval, I believe this study represents an important public health finding this winter, relevant to many parents of child-bearing age. It may even represent a delayed (2-5 years) form of postpartum depression. Of course, more research is needed; sadly, I seem to be deeply involved in advancing the field.
Feverishly yours,
Me
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Saturday, January 11, 2014
Back!
You may (or most likely not) have noticed that this blog disappeared for a few days. Basically, several of you were kind enough to email me and say: "Hey, it's not that hard to figure out who you are."
And that was helpful. And it also required a reaction. So I took down the blog while I thought a bit. And what I ended up doing is taking down most of the old posts.
This is not because I'm not proud of them (although, wow, some of them are really longer than they need to be). And in truth, I never thought I was completely anonymous. But I was perhaps not terribly cautious, and from now on, I wanted to be a bit more careful.
I don't have the time right now to edit those old posts and make sure I'm ok with them being seen by a wider audience, so away they went to a secret hiding place. Those posts still exist, along with your treasured comments, in a more private area of the digital world. Really, truly, your comments are the best part, and part of what made taking everything down so very hard. But part of what made this fun was I just went through all of them and reveled in those comments, and they are still wonderful.
Anyway, the site is back up now - edited, redacted, but I think better. Because now I can keep writing, if with more awareness. And I'm hoping this new setup will mean that I am, in the end, less paralyzed.
Thank you all.
(Oh! If you were following the "other" blog - the one about saying Kaddish - I made that one "invitation only". I believe I already added the people who emailed me last time wanting access, but please feel free to do so if I left you out.)
And that was helpful. And it also required a reaction. So I took down the blog while I thought a bit. And what I ended up doing is taking down most of the old posts.
This is not because I'm not proud of them (although, wow, some of them are really longer than they need to be). And in truth, I never thought I was completely anonymous. But I was perhaps not terribly cautious, and from now on, I wanted to be a bit more careful.
I don't have the time right now to edit those old posts and make sure I'm ok with them being seen by a wider audience, so away they went to a secret hiding place. Those posts still exist, along with your treasured comments, in a more private area of the digital world. Really, truly, your comments are the best part, and part of what made taking everything down so very hard. But part of what made this fun was I just went through all of them and reveled in those comments, and they are still wonderful.
Anyway, the site is back up now - edited, redacted, but I think better. Because now I can keep writing, if with more awareness. And I'm hoping this new setup will mean that I am, in the end, less paralyzed.
Thank you all.
(Oh! If you were following the "other" blog - the one about saying Kaddish - I made that one "invitation only". I believe I already added the people who emailed me last time wanting access, but please feel free to do so if I left you out.)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)