From a
Guardian photo competition"Susanna Wickes: "I took the vaporetto to the tiny island of San Giorgio in Venice and found myself completely alone in the bell tower of the church there. I was able to enjoy a peaceful, tourist-free sunset over the beautiful city."
Brilliant, so you're not a tourist then or you hate yourself. I always find this annoying, especially when the lesbian hobbit on her travel program on radio 4 goes on about how a place was so untouristy, undiscovered and such like; so you're broadcasting a program about travel, which is tourism, and you are exhorting all your listeners go to a place because it's untouristy, so when they get there it will still be untouristy?
Travel journalism is some of the worst journalism, free trips for puffs for areas, hotels, resorts; you hardly ever see a bad report do you? I prefer John Betjeman's approach travel writing where he doesn't tell you exactly where a place is. It's just somewhere in southern Oxfordshire etc, if you really must go there then you'll have to work a bit. But people don't really want to work for a destination, they very rarely travel far from the beaten track, thank god. Without travel programs there woould be a lot fewer tourists.
Look at the word tourists; to do a tour, a preset, organized circuit, principally for fun, amusement or as a consumerist intangible diversion.
But to travel, well in the OED it kicks off with
"To torment, distress; to suffer affliction; to labour, toil; to suffer the pains of parturition; etc.: see
TRAVAIL v. 1-4.
2. a. intr. To make a journey; to go from one place to another; to journey."
Travelling is full of pain or boredom sometimes of just plain toil. And note that it's the opposite of to tour; this is to go from one place to another.
I'm not sure about having a baby, but it does feel like that sometimes, though with fewer varicoase veins.
So I'm not going to tell you about all the interesting places I know.
You'll have to find them yourselves.