Subscribe to get an email notification when the next batch of $100 USD paintings is available.
HOW TO BUY: Make your selection. Email me (or use FB or Instagram) the TITLES and NUMBERS along with where you live (USA or which province in Canada). I’ll send you the payment details.
“I Walk Alone” named #67 in 100 Best Protest Songs of all Time
“Before the riot-grrrl movement fully emerged raging from the Pacific Northwest, there was Vancouver’s Mecca Normal, a drumless punk-poetry duo out to challenge the world with DIY energy, feminist lyrics, and a riveting, audience-baiting performance style. The dizzying cult classic “I Walk Alone” captures the unique fear of simply being a woman walking by herself in a city. Minimal and harrowing, it’s a shout for women to live in a world without feeling like a target. Vocalist Jean Smith added in live performances, “Because it’s my right to walk anywhere, any time of day, wearing whatever the fuck I want!”” – Rolling Stone
For those who haven’t seen “I Walk Alone” live, this is what happens.
The album track the article is referring to is available on the K Records BandCamp.
I haven’t painted this version of “On Stage” since 2022 when the person in the back didn’t have a microphone because I thought that adding one wasn’t great for the composition. Also, I think their mouths were closed. I wasn’t keen on leaving them without a visible role in the band, but I anticipated my audience would imagine they were playing guitar as opposed to tambourine. Times have changed. Not in terms of the faith I have in my audience, but in the ways we need to move forward with two amplified voices as opposed to one.
Turns out adding the second microphone is okay within the composition. It’s surprising how few marks are required to confirm its presence because we all know what the blob in front of their mouth is in this context. Viewers’ brains fill in the concept. It’s not an exercise in how neatly I can render a microphone. The whole thing is an energized visual account at close proximity of 2 people singing what could be called a protest song.
I know this style (energetic, less realistic) and subject (bright hair, aggressive mouth, bordering on unattractive), aren’t for everyone. I’m aware that some art buyers want things in their homes based on what they demand of their space, whether it’s a sanctuary of beautiful things or an ongoing quest to add items that go with what’s already there. To some extent, we rely on our homes to shut out the world while political art tends to magnify injustices in ways that can be uncomfortable.
The market place is filled with items vying for a position in our homes, but it is to their credit that for many artists decorating a room is absolutely the last thing on their mind while they’re making art that intends to disrupt, challenge, inform and advance humanity by illuminating matters of importance. In fact, it is a very odd thing to have to consider that angry art, ugly art, intense art will need to be purchased by someone who will likely want to put it in their home. Need, as in, the artist needs to be paid and likely needs to feel a sense of acceptance or demand.
Oh, and that’s what the protest song in the painting is about. They’re encouraging artists of all kinds to use their voices to amplify social justice issues. And… it’s sentences like that… lol… that have to be endured along the way. Cut creators of political art some slack as they find ways to incorporate important ideas into their work. Presenting work that puts forth social justice issues (I’ll keep using this phrase) tends to make artists feel vulnerable and open to attack. I can see why artists would skip the political content and mind their own bottom line, but… then you have Banksy, Guerilla Girls, and Pussy Riot (before they were identified) all rising to social importance with clout while retaining anonymity.
“On Stage #18″ (11 x 14” acrylic on canvas panel) SOLD / $100 USD
“On Stage #19″ (11 x 14” acrylic on canvas panel) SOLD / $100 USD
“On Stage #20″ (11 x 14” acrylic on canvas panel) SOLD / $100 USD
It’s interesting; sometimes it feels utterly daunting to use art to respond to what’s going on in the world. I hate to admit it, but it can feel futile. I get disheartened, but it sure helps to know I’m part of a community that supports what I do. Thank you! I hope what I do makes you feel supported too. Reciprocity ahoy!
Sometimes I start painting without an idea per se, but rather a sort of energetic trust that something will arrive because of what I’ve been learning about. Today I didn’t feel like doing a face other than the Angry Woman in Rock which almost always seems remarkably appropriate.
Landscapes seemed like a good destination. Once I got the yellow in and then the pink, I started to feel better. Spring. Spring uprising. That’s always a viable theme, so I went ahead feeling personal urgency to respond dissipate. Taking the pressure off, which by this point in the painting was probably good.
The last thing I did was to use a Chinese calligraphy brush to do the dark vertical lines on the forsythia and the cherry. Obviously these are very bold, bolder than how other painters would approach branches. I love how they worked out. Calligraphy being associated with text. Lettering. I noticed that some of the lines seemed to almost form letters. On the left.
All of this swirled around to remind me of how quilts were used in the era of slaves fleeing the southern US to safety. The blockiness of the overall composition feels a bit quilt-like. The fresh, blue sky day would be as suitable to air out a quilt or to give directions to safety. And so, meanings arrive after the paintings were completed as opposed to going in to illustrate a thought in advance.
Of course, being here (historically and on FB), it seems like finding different ways to say things may become important.
That is all. For now.
“Forsythia and Cherry in Bloom at the Lake #1″ (11 x 14” acrylic on canvas panel) SOLD
“Forsythia and Cherry in Bloom at the Lake #2″ (11 x 14” acrylic on canvas panel) SOLD
“Forsythia and Cherry in Bloom at the Lake #3″ (11 x 14” acrylic on canvas panel) SOLD
I can’t resist sharing this photo of Diebenkorn showing his daughter Gretchen his new, abstract work (Ocean Park series) after he made the switch from figurative to abstract circa 1967.
I’m almost 15 years younger than Gretchen, who, in 1968, brought her husband to her dad’s studio to see this new work. It’s likely that her husband took the photo. In that era women would typically be more aware and concerned about how their faces looked, which emotions might be jeopardy of being captured by a photographer. In this candid shot, she would have been more comfortable if it was her husband behind the camera. Speculation aside; it’s a remarkable photo no matter how it came to be.
The photo is from a lecture she, Gretchen, gave about life with her father, during which she tells a story about an abstract painting her mother did that Diebornkorn had issues with. He brought up his concerns many times to his wife, who was evidently not planning to heed his instruction. Then, one Christmas, Diebenkorn had his son take the painting off the wall and out of its frame. He cut out a chunk of paper, glued it to the offending area, and put it back on the wall. Gretchen makes it sound like no one noticed.
Here’s where I’ll self-referentially insert myself. Both my parents were painters, basically the same age as Diebenkorn. As a kid, I was aware of their trajectory away from figurative to abstraction and then back again, sometimes with more complicated figurative interpretations informed by their abstract expressionist experiences (and what was going on historically in painting).
For me, it’s a bit trippy to hear Gretchen talking about her early years as the daughter of painters. Obviously, neither of my parents were famous, but their paintings were included in group shows at the Vancouver Art Gallery and both had local commercial galleries representing them. I’m here to assure you that not being famous didn’t dilute their intensity. Painting was the important thing in our family. Studios were built. Phone calls with art dealers were had and discussed (lots of yelling). Shows were prepared for (painters were responsible for framing). All of the extraneous infrastructure was dealt with, but day-to-day life was made up of heaviness or lightness of moods, various successes (insert Tarzan yell), failures (stomping around, doors slamming), reveals of new work (look at me!!) and criticism (hurt feelings).
My mom was an art school graduate (who did not have a job outside the house) and my dad was a tenacious natural from the wrong side of the tracks who invented his trajectory (freelance commercial art to ad agencies, then a full time painter and back to freelancer when that didn’t pay the bills).
The story of Gretchen’s father altering her mother’s painting is shocking to me. It’s an abject lack of respect for her and her work. My dad may have been a opinionated hothead, but he respected my mother’s artist abilities tremendously and frequently posited her talent above his own. He would never have done anything like this, although certainly there were bits of paper around that were positioned and adhered to alter paintings as they discussed them.