Better Dead Than Poppy

​Nick would like to have left Juniper’s cocktail lounge with icy dignity; all he managed was to slink out, his cheeks burning. He’d guessed Poppy Dolittle would be there on Christmas Eve, and he’d been right.

​For thirteen years they’d shared classrooms; since the age of five he’d known that she was the girl for him. The mild affection had by teenage years turned into a crippling crush, and somehow Poppy had never seemed to notice Nick’s constant admiring glances.

​In sixth form she’d developed an air of superiority and had begun to wear designer labels and mention her famous friends. As time went on, she seemed to live in another world entirely; one of West End parties and glamorous holidays.

​Nick hadn’t seen her for three months by Christmas; so his plan was simple. He acquired a sprig of mistletoe, stalked her socials till he was sure she would be at Juniper’s, and played the scene a thousand times in his head.

​He’d bring her back to the bungalow; therefore he paid Daphne Daffy forty quid to clean it and bought fresh flowers that were sitting in a jug as he lacked a vase. He’d even been to Primark and bought black satin sheets, and been to Boots the Chemists to acquire the necessary.

​In short, he was confident. Arrayed in his best shirt, reeking of expensive aftershave and firmly convinced love conquers all, tonight was the night he’d declare his love and carry Poppy home.

​He’d entered the bar, bought a soft drink as driving, and then saw Poppy – beautiful, no resplendent – holding court at a table of handsome guys and girls content to bask in her reflected glory. His heart leapt; if after all this psyching himself up she wasn’t here, well, he couldn’t think of anything worse.

​He strode across, spoke her name. Her eyes lingered on his face a few seconds, she looked him up and down, and then her gaze slid easily back to her friends, and she returned to her conversation. If it were not for subsequent events, Nick would have tortured himself between if she totally failed to recognise the boy she’d grown up with, or perhaps worse, had recognised him and was utterly indifferent. His eyes stung, and realising that was it, he hurried up the stairs, out of the bar, and into the night.

​Once in his car he totally lost it. For a moment, as his world seemed about to cave in, he thought about driving off to Scotland and never returning. Luckily Nick was young, overly optimistic as we have already seen, and he suddenly recalled Carol, who worked with him, had suggested a Christmas drink. She lived up on the Medway; he had plenty of time to get to Rochester and show how over Poppy he was by…

​Let us not dwell on the less than flattering way in which Nick now switched affections and began to think about how to get Carol back to his new sheets with Christmassy chat-up lines about ‘pulling a cracker’. Suffice to say Carol would have been disappointed in him, and he might have been slapped. Luckily, fate intervened.

​Nick had put on Hot Chocolate’s classic ‘It Started With a Kiss’ and was luxuriating in his heartbreak and the stark betrayal of his deep unspoken passion by the (mercifully) oblivious Poppy. Between stifled sobs he suddenly saw her; a girl in white, standing by the road in the icy driving rain, apparently trying to wave him down.

​Nick pulled over, sniffed, and wiped his face. The girl did not wait for an invitation; she jumped in, dropped her cardigan by her feet and stared silently ahead. Nick looked at her almost bashfully, not turning his head to look directly. He felt slightly nervous – is she a nut? She’d been standing by the old bus stop, but judging by the blast of icy air that entered the car with her, well, she must have been freezing. No wonder she took a chance on a lone male driver; hypothermia could not have been far off. Her skin, that of it he could see, was translucently pale with the cold.

​He let the silence sit, started the car to get the heater running and switched off the music. She’d talk when she was ready; he pulled out cautiously (it’s a famous accident black spot) and drove on up to the top of Blue Bell Hill. As the streetlights’ glare entered the car the girl suddenly spoke – she gave an address that Nick recognised as a terraced street in an old part of Maidstone where he sometimes parked.

Resentment flooded his brain. Did she think he was a taxi? Why wait till he’d driven all this way to suddenly ask to return? Who hitches a lift in the wrong direction? Then he looked at her: younger than him, dressed in some hippy chick fashion his mum might have worn, cold, vulnerable, fragile. “Nick,” he said. She gave no name, just repeated the address. He shrugged, looked to turn the car. “Jackie,” she said, and for a moment she looked at him. Her eyes seemed enormous, as if the pupils had expanded until there was only blackness. Doubtless a trick of the long black lashes and metallic blue eyeshadow…

​“Can you remember my address?” she asked with a soft Kent accent. Local girl. Nick had taken her for a foreigner, but her accent was stronger than his, and he was born and bred. Nick nodded, but she repeated it a third time, earnestly. Once again Nick nodded, but increasingly he was looking forward to dropping her home. A crazy idea was forming in his head – he’d go back to Juniper’s and go and sit down at Poppy’s table? As the idea began to grow he pulled off at the Lord Lees roundabout, and instinctively turned homewards. He shrugged – he’d rejoin the road via The Common junction, no harm done.

​It was at that moment that, after pausing at the junction, his engine would not restart. Swearing, he got out into driving hail; a passing van driver pulled over and helped him push the car half on to the pavement. Good of the bloke – and for his efforts he’d been rewarded by getting to drive Jackie back to Maidstone, or so it appeared. When he’d planned to ask her to steer she’d already gone, hopped straight in the transit, he suspected.

​The car could wait; the stinging icy rain, the fact he was soaked to the skin, and the beginning of a feeling that maybe approaching Poppy again is not the right thing to do… It was then Nick noticed Jackie’s cardigan. Oh well, he knew her address, she’d made damned sure of that. He took off to his home, running down Robin Hood Lane and yearning only for a hot shower.

​Nick had his shower; pulled on dry jeans and a faded Clash T-shirt, and hesitated between the TV, PS5 or seeking comfort in the dubious pleasures of the worldwide web. Tinder struck him as shameful, a vice he could never own; Pornhub a minor indiscretion. Christmas Eve, must be something on TV? As his gaze turns to the screen and he fumbles for the remote, he yelps in sheer shock. A woman’s face, dark eyes and blonde hair plastered across her face, pressed up against his window.

​A braver chap might have pulled the curtains shut and retreated to bed; Nick, shaking in fear, instead dashed behind his sofa. Only Jackie’s wailing drew him out. Freak she might be, but she was cold and clearly unhappy. Oh, maybe she’d come for her cardigan?

​He threw open the window, reached out, and helped her clamber in. “Can I really come in?” she asked timidly. Nick snorted, reassured her and was off finding some old sweatpants, a T-shirt and his car blanket. He turns on the shower, gets it to temperature and gently propels the freezing cold girl into the bathroom. Happy gurgling noises reward his effort, but her skin was so cold to the touch he considers calling an ambulance.

​Instead he makes hot chocolate, adds little marshmallows and cranks up the heating. When she appears in his clothes she is still as pale as bone china, but she rewards him with a smile. Her mouth is a little too big he notes, a bit froggy. Her nose is pronounced; without the makeup she apparently did her best to remove she looks younger, but weary.

​She sits on the sofa; he pops on A Ghost Story For Christmas, and seemingly unnerved, she makes noises like a frightened little girl as the Gatiss adaptation builds, before suddenly sliding over, wrapping the blanket around them both and clutching him tightly in terror.

​“Are you scared of ghosts?” says Nick, calculating if changing channel might blow his chance of unexpected but far from unwelcome intimacy. “Don’t be silly,” breathes Jackie gently into his ear, her tone clearly mimicking the spooky cadence of theatrical spooks. “Some of my best friends – all of my friends – are ghosts.” She laughs and tries to push as close to Nick as possible. She is still icy cold; he pushes back, cuddles her protectively.

​“If it bothers you I’ll switch it off?” Jackie sighs. “You really don’t get it, do you?” Nick considered three witty retorts, gentle reassurance, and then just kisses her. Jackie happily returns the kiss, and our two lovers retreat to the bedroom.

​In the morning Nick awakes alone. The clothes he had given Jackie are back in the drawer; there is no sign of the strange but wildly passionate woman who had almost devoured him the night before. Was it all a weird dream? He checks his phone and wallet are still there, then he dashes over to stare out the window. What day is this? Why, it is Christmas Day, and Nick feels a profound sense of loss.

​It was gone ten and Nick was about to depart for family Christmas dinner when he noticed Jackie’s cardigan: pale coral pink with unusual wooden toggle buttons. Of course! He knows her address and has every right to go and see her. First though, family Christmas Dinner!

​The family festivities went on later than he anticipated; the church clock is striking midnight as Nick staggers drunkenly in. There, glaring at him, is Jackie. “Where the hell have you been?” Her tone conveys both relief and annoyance and Nick immediately realises she cares for him. This strikes him like lightning: a woman he likes is into him? The realisation a moment later that she somehow broke into his house seems irrelevant. She can steal his flatscreen TV and be welcome to it.

​Jackie however is clearly unhappy. “You idiot. You were supposed to take my cardigan to my parents’ house today!” Nick feels put upon. “It’s Christmas Day,” he counters, “they’d be enjoying their dinner!” Jackie launches from the armchair, slides across the lino and melodramatically waves her arms. “No! They will be mourning their murdered daughter!” Nick immediately grabs Jackie in a tight embrace, crushing her close to him, rocking her gently. No wonder she is weird; her sister murdered! Poor girl! He holds her gently, strokes her hair until she kisses him suddenly and pulls Nick into the bedroom. He offers no resistance – this is his perfect Christmas.

​Nick was not really surprised Jackie was gone when he woke; her cardigan was carefully placed on a chair. Why on Earth did she not take it with her? He suddenly smiled. It was signalling her intent to return. That really mattered now; Poppy Dolittle could have appeared at his door in her raciest underwear now and he would tell her where to go. Except he couldn’t quite decide what Poppy’s lingerie should look like, so he had to imagine the scene more times than was strictly healthy for a man now falling quietly in love.

​Falling in love? He caught himself, clutched at the sink, decided it was true and he liked it. Jackie is deeply weird but there is something almost spooky about their connection.

​Still, the murdered sister was distressing: he’d look it up. He Googled but nothing seemed to connect. Eventually he decided to try and find her surname, but he had an address, not a name. And then he saw her twin staring at him from an article: but this girl was murdered fifty years ago, and the paper was carrying an “unsolved tragedies” anniversary piece. He read it carefully, and learned of the murder of Jacqueline whose bones were finally located at the base of Blue Bell Hill in late 1975.

​Nick sat down heavily and looked thoughtful. Of course he’d heard of the phantom hitchhiker of Blue Bell Hill – lots of people claimed to have encountered her. So he had slept with a ghost? Well, Sharon Gibbs once told him no living, breathing woman would want him as she turned him down flat, and it appears she was right. He shrugged. If he loved Jackie, did it really matter if she was not strictly speaking alive? Is it legally still necrophilia if you have enthusiastic consent?

​As darkness falls Jackie takes shape on the sofa. Nick takes a moment to notice, gives an involuntary shudder, and then squeezes her close. “I know,” he says. “You are dead.” Jackie looks at him, stunned by what she has attached herself to. “Of course I’m bleedin’ dead – I told you I was murdered!” Nick, stung, gasps, “I thought you had a sister!” The two stare at each other, and lust begins to work its magic. They smile, embrace, kiss, and a long time later Nick thinks to ask: “So why do you stay? I mean, haunt?”

​Jackie recoils in shock; a Pringles tube lifts from the coffee table and flies at Nick’s head. He bats it away without thinking. Jackie stands up, flaps her arms and wails lugubriously. Nick stands up, flaps his arms and begins to hum the Birdie Song. The light bulb dims, a coffee cup lifts and then drops and the crockery in the draining board rattles, but it’s no good. Nick laughs at her, and Jackie picks up and throws a cushion by the old-fashioned method of using her hands.

​Suddenly she sits down on the arm of the chair and says, “I’m a lot more solid.” She examines herself cautiously, as if looking for malignant bumps. “Less ethereal – Nick, what are you doing to me?” She stands up and rushes at the wall but is defeated as her nose squishes against plaster. After much effort she manages to push her arm out through the wall; luckily the road is empty and no one witnesses a lady’s manicured hand appearing from bungalow brickwork.

​Nick propels her back to the sofa; the night passes in their sharing memories, hopes and musical tastes. Jackie expresses a horror he has no stereo or record collection, and just blinks when Nick says, “The way you look, you’ll qualify for next year’s old age pension.” It is at this point he realises his girlfriend is 77 years old… His look at that thought is fortunately missed as Jackie has found Chicory Tip, ABBA and The Brotherhood of Man on Sounds of the Seventies, and is dancing around the room to “Come Up and See Me (Make Me Smile)”.

​Nick watches bemused, until he gives in and starts to dance terribly to T. Rex and Slade. Thank goodness she is haunting him; he’d never pull in 1975 with his disco moves. Jackie doesn’t care though; she dances, she drinks Southern Comfort and coke and she forgets an eternity of flitting through trees and haunting the…

​Then she sits down and looks sad. Not “soul damned to wander the earth for eternity” sad, not “phantom wailing about how dark and lonely it is” sad – no, more nostalgia, and “where did the years go” sad.

​Nick sits on the floor, squeezes her hand and looks at her. “I think I know,” she says, with big eyes and an earnest look. “I seek not revenge, but to teach men a lesson. I manifest by the road, all alluring and very easy on the eye, and tempt sad little boys who think they are Casanova to pick me up. Then I drop my cardigan in the car and vanish. I give them my address, they go there with the cardigan and my dad gives them an earful. Or sometimes I borrow a coat or sweater, and give my address as opposite 210 Sutton Road. They’d find it draped on my tombstone, and freak out and run all the way to The Wheatsheaf for a stiff drink.”

​Nick giggles, puts his head on her knee, and looks up with puppy dog eyes, besotted by his spook. “So why me? You’ve been chasing lonely men for fifty years, leaving them damaged and scared of women – why did you not just vanish?”

​Jackie thinks for a moment and shrugs. “Maybe you are good at getting infatuated with mythic girls who don’t quite exist? Maybe you are just the most desperate, saddest, most hopeless loser I’ve ever met? You make Frank Spencer look like Action Man.”

​Nick shrugged and wondered if Frank Spencer was one of Jackie’s old boyfriends. He decides not to enquire, and he is not particularly hurt by her description. He’s heard worse from living girls. Meanwhile Jackie has discovered Ghost Adventures, a show she regards as high comedy, “as good as that new show with the Spanish waiter”.

​Nick meanwhile is Googling for advice: he has no idea what to do. The Society for Psychical Research sounds hopeful, but it appears the real expert is a woman called Brocarde. She married a Victorian ghost soldier called Eduardo, exorcising him after she discovered he was having an affair with the ghost of Marilyn Monroe. She’ll know what to do! Or Danny Robins, host of Uncanny – maybe he could interview the Ghost of Blue Bell Hill live on air?

​It was, predictably, Jackie who finally came up with a solution. She’d discovered her murderer still lived, but at 84 and very frail, Nick absolutely refused to go beat him up. This angered Jackie, but her telekinetic powers seemed to be fading, so she just hid in the airing cupboard to make Nick think he’d lost her forever. It worked too, and his dramatic grief gave her an idea.

​As midnight struck, and another year rolled in, she brought out a cardboard box, sealed with sellotape and with “DO NOT OPEN” written in a girly hand, joined up and florid, of a type no longer taught. “This box contains my cardigan. As long as it remains unopened I stay – how can I leave? Also you must never, ever give me an item of clothing. If you do you will never see me again, but find it draped on my grave!” She lets out her best sepulchral wail; Nick quietly notes she was dressed in his jeans, trainers and T-shirt but just nods solemnly and kisses her. He took the box and placed it on the highest shelf in the bungalow, behind his old school trophies – the most precious, dangerous thing he now owned.

​Dawn comes, and Nick and the dead girl face it together. She remains: solid, breathing, and a thousand times more real than Poppy Dolittle could ever be. Poppy was a dream he couldn’t afford, but Jackie was a nightmare he got to keep. He looked at his seventy-seven-year-old girlfriend as she felt the rays of the wintry sun, watching her stretch and shiver with delight. As Nick went to put the kettle on, wondering if ghosts preferred Earl Grey or Southern Comfort for breakfast, the silence of the grave was finally replaced by the roar of traffic on the hill behind the house.

Posted in Dreadful attempts at humour, Fiction, Paranormal | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Uncanny S5 e2 “Old Jim”

This story begins with a crow in a bedroom. A real crow, alive and flapping, discovered inside the house the day Louise and her mother moved in. In folklore that’s an omen. In reality, it’s probably a bird that came down a chimney before the flue was capped. Folklore and reality coexist quite happily — meaning is something we layer on afterwards. The crow was probably delighted to be released!

Footsteps!

Soon after, Louise hears footsteps on the stairs at night — and importantly, the family’s border collie hears them too. Dogs don’t hallucinate footsteps. That tells us: something in the physical environment was producing a repeated, recognisable, footstep-like sound. Old farmhouses that have been empty for some time often do this: heat changes cause joists and floorboards to flex at the same time every night. If the pipes run under the landing floor, it’s even more likely. My father once resolved a haunting that occurred at the same time every day by the magic of setting the heating to come on an hour later, causing the joist expansion on the stairs (the ghost) to follow an hour later. It is quite a common phenomena in houses that have stood empty for months, and when the heating first goes on in October each year. With access to the property it would be testable, but on balance of probabilities I find it likely.

Whispered Voice

Then there was the whispered voice. Heard at the very edge of perception. Louise is calm, sensible, grounded — not dramatic. People like that are worth listening to. The uncanny often sits just at the edge of what can be clearly described. It also made me wonder if she was the poltergeist agent, but so far I’ve heard nothing to think that’s necessary.

The Birthday Sleepover

Leanne was a friend staying over after a birthday party where Romeo & Juliet (1997) was watched and the Spice Girls listened to. She gets up to go to the loo and leaves Louise’s bedroom. The landing light is on and she sees an elderly man standing at the top of the stairs. She freaks out and next day at school says she is never going back again.

Now, here is the key question:

Why did she not assume it was a real man? Teenage girls aren’t instinctively afraid of elderly people. Something about the figure registered as wrong, but why? She is a stranger to the house, and surely she’d think grandparent or visitor not ‘ghost’. The figure is aware of her – stares at her – but she does not appear in the episode so we are not able to say what exactly happened. I’m also curious as to why Leanne did not wake up the other girls at the sleep over or shout for Louise’s mum? I’d have woken everyone up and barricaded the door if scared, but she apparently only relates the story the next day at school. That seems odd?

I don’t know what Leanne saw. The lack of her account given by her, and the lack of Louise’s mothers testimony makes it hard. Almost thirty years on Leanne herself might well not know, or remember the incident. We forget apparently paranormal incidents rapidly, but if anyone knows more the girls at the party might?

The House Shakes

Louise is home alone one night as her mother is out. She is in the bath, the house is quiet. And then there is a banging at the door and the entire building shakes. Plant pots fall from the windowsill into the sink. The dog freaks out and reacts as if an intruder.

Something physical happened.So let’s look at the real world suspects.

From Louise’s speech patterns and the cultural timestamps (Wannabe era / pre-Luhrmann VHS release), I estimated she was born around 1985 and these events happened around 1997-ish. So we check earthquakes in that window:

Bishops Castle 27th September 1996. Just after 2am. I remember it well; Crowley cat and I both wondered what it was here in Cheltenham.

Market Rasen, 3rd March 1997 – rattled windows.

Market Rasen, 27th February 2001 – noticeable across the region.

21 June 2002 – 3.3 tremor, minor.

Dudley, 22 September 2002 – just after midnight.

22 September 2003 – another large one.

Any of these could cause the shaking if the timing matched. But we know from the story that Louise’s mother was out visiting a friend when the shaking happened — not likely to be after midnight. So the most impressive Bishop Castle (27 September 1996) which was around 2am and the Dudley earthquake (22 September 2002) at 12.45am are unlikely. The Market Rasen quakes are occurred at 7.30am the other just after noon so we can discount those. It sounds like an earthquake but I don’t think it was.

The RAF

Which leaves us with the other entirely reasonable culprit. I grew up beside an RAF airfield in Suffolk. Low-level training flights and sonic booms were simply part of childhood. Several fast jets in formation, transitioning through Mach, produce a delayed pressure wave that can physically jolt a house. It’s a thump that arrives seemingly from nowhere. The air hits the building; things fall. This is the North Yorkshire Moors where training exercises take place? This matches the bath incident if a couple of low flying RAF jets hit the sound barrier over the moors, causing a sustained overlapping vibration.

Meanwhile, the episode casually mentions that Bridget’s house shakes whenever a lorry passes. If your home vibrates violently when an HGV goes by, you don’t have a haunting — you have a structural issue with foundation coupling. Someone needs to call Highways before the gable end decides to migrate into the garden.

Oh Jim…

Then there is the simultaneous speaking event. I have heard accounts where people feel as though someone else is speaking through them, but simultaneously is strange. Normally I’d file that under dissociation or conversational mirroring…but here I honestly have no idea. It is odd. Suddenly one night while Louise and her mother are watching TV two pictures fall from the wall, they both jump up.and shout “Jim!” They don’t know why.

Sceptic Bridget Christie then says something odd; perhaps the two women living together have their menstrual cycles synced. And that explains this how? It reminds me of the line from Ghostbusters (1984) “Alice, are you menstruating?”

Misogyny aside, the idea women’s periods sync up if they live together dates from Martha McClintock in 1971, but tells us more about 1971 feminism than reality. Subsequent research and more recently large datasets from period-tracking apps show no synchrony. Cycles shift naturally and alignment is coincidence given enough months and enough women. I’m pretty sure no period has ever thrown pictures off a wall unless it was cos a man called someone a hormonal woman, and then we’d know who threw it.

Old Jim.

Ascribing a ghost a name is ancient practice. It turns “the thing that clanks” into Eric the Ghost. It reduces the unknowable to something manageable. The fact that a previous resident was named Jim is interesting, but not meaningful. James/Jim was a Top 5 UK male name every year from 1900 to 1950, and Top 10 until 1995 — especially in Yorkshire. Most old houses have had a Jim in them somewhere along the line.

Finally — a point missed entirely in the episode: there is an occult distinction between

Obsession: something influences you, but you remain yourself.

Possession: something evicts you and takes the wheel.

The story gestures more towards obsession or projection — not possession, assuming that anything ghostly is involved.

Or you could invoke psychological priming: were they watching Jim Davidson? (Generation Game) Jim Bowen? (Bullseye) Jim Rosenthal? (ITV sport) Even Jimmy Nail???

I don’t think mail for a former resident is the source of the name. That Jim died in 1988 or soon thereafter? If he was the immediately previous resident however, and I was not sure where the name came from letters addressed to a Jim landing on the mat might be the unconscious source.

So what are we left with?

A house settling after being empty.

A dog hearing footsteps.

A voice at the edge of perception.

A real physical shock event, likely seismic or acoustic.

A mother navigating social anxiety about being “the one with the ghost house.”

A name chosen for the ghost, simultaneously.

No ghosts are proved. The uncanny remains — because the uncanny is what happens when the ordinary is not interpreted as ordinary, and I can see this would have been absolutely terrifying. Only the one apparition is claimed, and it was never seen by Louise and her mum, but what they experienced was far more frightening than the figure on the stairs.

I believe in ghosts: yet I’m not sure if this house was objectively haunted. The narrative says ghost but that’s what happens when you put all the elements together; examined individually? I favour natural causes for much, but will never know the truth?

Posted in Debunking myths, Paranormal, Reviews and Past Events, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bath, Taps, and the Poverty of Theory: notes after last night’s Uncanny Episode s5 e1

Did you listen to last night’s new Uncanny episode? It is well worth a listen!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/m0010x7c?

Several resident couples, a steep Georgian terrace in Bath, taps that like to run themselves, and a few phenomena scattered across a million pound a house terrace in the Beacon Hill area of the city. With house prices like that no wonder some people were reticent about appearing!

Where in Bath?

From the geographical clues, I’m happy enough that I know the terrace in question: small Georgian fronts, four storeys where the back and front think gravity means different things, vaults and voids and old pipe runs, the lot perched like a goat track high over London Road. A million quid buys a lovely view, a beautiful home and some dodgy Victorian plumbing much renovated and still functioning.

The taps

The interesting bit is the initial witnesses live uneventfullly and happily in the house for years. If you’re going to have “taps that turn themselves on,” Bath is an ideal stage: gravity-fed attic tanks, shared and ancient runs across terraces, local pressure changes as neighbours draw water, and the occasional siphon effect when air gets involved. This is a job for a plumber, not a ghostbuster. I said as much as it aired: bring in someone local, trace the line, watch the pressure. Sure enough, other houses up the row had the same issue. That’s the tell. Yes a plumber featured on the show; talked about dodgy washers, broken cartridges and the kind of water hammer resonance notorious for turning on 1980s mixer taps, but did not really get near the kind of stuff happening here.

So why did it start suddenly? My guess is a new system or adjustment in one of the other nine houses. Without turning up and turning off the water in the street it’s hard to know which houses are connected; here in the similarly aged house I live in I share a stopgap with one neighbour; sadly not Becky next door the other side. We tend to think of our houses as discrete units, but plumbing, joists and even attics sometimes interconnect. I’ve lived in houses where I could visit every other house in the row without going outside by crawling through the attics. This is probably best left to small children, voyeurs and burglars though!

Infrasound

While we’re here: yes, infrasound exists—wind over roofs, traffic rumble, mechanicals. But it isn’t “19 Hz spookr tone = ghost.” It’s the standing wave effect involving infrasound not the presence or absence of sound at that frequency that matters according to the late Dr. Vic Tandy’s papers.

Ciaran is an expert on the subject; the mention on Uncanny is more of a quick nod to a rather outmoded idea than a real suggestion I think. I am no expert on acoustic physics, but it’s not going to move a kettle through a wall.

SOD: Small Object Displacement

The couple down the street had textbook SOD. It’s astonishingly common in both “hauntings” and normal Tuesdays: misplacement, unnoticed handling, memory artefacts. SOD is what you get when domestic life happens faster than recall. You don’t need agency; you need a busy household and a brain that likes the path of least resistance. SOD is my term for what Mary Rose Barrington called jottles – it stands for Small Object Displacement. We find this in almost every case: often associated with “perfect placement” effects. It was one of the first things I noticed that made me take physical phenomena seriously. And when your car keys vanish, blame the SODding ghost.

Renovations cause hauntings

This idea is very common: you disturb a house, it disturbs you. It’s folklore but quote possibly true. Renovations are noisy, intrusive, and make you watch the house. Attention plus expectation will populate any building with incidents. It may well be a real effect and I’ve certainly seen way weirder things.

Writing on doors

I was amused by the door-writing incident. Builders’ merchants and joiners do write customer’s names on doors. It happens: if in faint pencil or only noticeable in certain lights it might be instructions to the delivery driver as to which house it goes to? If it had read “Marianne light candles” I’d have been more amused ; “Mrs Brown” could be anyone. For context, writing isn’t rare in poltergeist catalogues—about 5% in Gauld & Cornell’s database. Fires are around 11%, water effects similar single digits. These are factors found in the huge study of investigated poltergeist cases performed by Gauld and Cornell and published in their magisterial book Poltergeists (1979)

Apparitions

One witness reported the distinct sensation of someone sitting by him while he meditated. Perfectly human. Meditation and edge-of-sleep states produce presence hallucinations, shifts in body-schema, odd proprioceptive jolts. They feel real because they are real experiences—just not necessarily of someone else in the room. I’ve had some very peculiar effects myself while meditating. Interesting, but not proof of spooks. The daughter saw as a very young child a creepy old man at the bottom of her bed. I’ve had a similar edge of sleep experience real enough for me to hurl a bedside lamp at it; dreams persisting in to waking states, frightening but not a ghost.

Burning Mojo

One of the weirdest elements of the case was the scorched magazine.

A small public-service announcement: if sunlight routinely ignited floor objects, Britain would be ash by teatime. Bottles and optics can focus light and start fires, true; but it’s not common, and it’s testable. As a sceptical explanation for the facts as reported – it is pretty awful?

The Bath precedent: 1963

When I heard scorching mentioned my mind went straight to the September 1963 Bath poltergeist Tony Cornell investigated: house on a hill, misbehaving plumbing, objects allegedly scorched. Pretty much everything we are seeing at the terrace occurred there in what was described as a “council house on the edge of a stony hill”. I don’t know if Ben Machall covers it in his biography of Tony – I have not bothered to read it yet – but the case was certainly properly investigated and seems to be a legitimate poltergeist.

My sceptical ideas about dodgy plumbing fall apart here: Mr H.M Popham the Bath plumber took the system apart repeatedly, did all the tests and wrote it up at length; Gauld & Cornell reproduced the statement in Poltergeists (1979) . So the current case doesn’t sit alone; and I’m pretty certain having known Tony and knowing how his mind worked he has pretty much told us where that house was. Close, not the same place.

There are other cases similar though: the Bolton inundations get a mention, again multiple properties in same row. What confused me was the suggestion that these multiple house cases are uncommon; actually there are many such clusters. The Gorton poltergeist and the Fornham Road Bury St Edmunds clusters spring to mind but there are many more? If Uncanny ever need a researcher with a passing acquaintance with the literature, who ya gonna call?

The Poverty of Theory

What we heard last night struck me as sincere witnesses reporting genuine phenomena. Yet are all the incidents the same “spook”? In a 1996 JSPR piece I argued hauntings are constructed as narratives from lots of potentially unrelated incidents. Each must be appraised and understood individually – in Uncanny they are presented as a ghost story, and indeed there seem reasons to believe there maybe paranormal elements here. Nonetheless the notion of the ghost arises from the “clues” the individual weird events provide, once we start paying attention?

Long-time readers will know I’ve played with this more formally. In 2013 I replicated Houran & Lange (1996)’s “unhaunted house” diary study at a slightly larger scale—five completing couples, four of whom logged reportable oddities over a month. SOD and misbehaving kit led the table; Halloween produced one event (so much for calendar drama).

Crucially, my data didn’t show the logistic “running out of anomalies” curve they predicted. It looked linear: people kept noticing things. I still don’t see what would limit the supply of “potential anomalies” in a domestic environment unless the limiting factor is boredom with diaries.

What I think this case shows

  1. Plumbing explains the headline act. Gravity-fed tanks + shared runs + pressure transients = self-starting taps. Multiple houses in the row had it. That’s not a ghost; that’s hydraulics. There are other cases where the taps turn on: I once caused chaos in a hall of residence by artificially inducing water hammer in Fullwood Hall, Cheltenham. (Not the hall I accidentally flooded – that was Rosehill). 😉 I’ve actually had PhD hydraulic engineers baffled by cases in the past; I accept the taps could be paranormal. In the Bath 1963 case Mr H H Popham shows the lengths you should go to; and the possibility that I’m totally wrong and this is a spook. My friend Philip Jenkins blames the plumbing for every ghost story.
  2. SOD and attentional set explain much of the rest. Once you pay attention to a haunting you start to notice all the incredibly weird things that happen all the time. In normal life we are uncomfortable with ambiguity and mystery; we shrug and soon forget. I think these things happen to all of us more often than we remember. If humans have psychic powers we might activate them once we can blame them in a spook: we then haunt ourselves by what I term psi-de effects. This results in a contagion; as more people learn about the ghost and belief grows the faith enables greater feats of paranormality. Or maybe its a psychological contagion; I doubt it in some cases though.
  3. Meditation/edge-of-sleep cover the presence sensations. Compelling to the percipient; neurological by default. Very real to experience, very frightening, not related to taps or SOD?
  4. Local history shows something very similar happened 62 years ago on a hilltop outside Bath. It could be coincidence but I doubt it. There may be a link; I’m just astonished Uncanny missed the earlier case.
  5. The narrative is constructed. A string of incidents becomes a haunting afterwards. That’s the Poverty of Theory problem: we love a good story and retro-fit coherence. Each of these events is fascinating in its own right, but it doesn’t mean they are one spook…

I’m not saying nothing happened. Things clearly did. I’m saying we still don’t know what a haunting is, and this kind of case is where you can watch one forming in real time: domestic physics, psychology, culture, and meaning all knitting themselves into a plot. Get a plumber. Keep a diary. Enjoy the view. And if your kettle flies out of the window – blame the SODding ghost.

Posted in Debunking myths, Paranormal, Reviews and Past Events | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Marketing RPGs: or the Gamer Generation and the Booth Babes

Just saw a tabletop rpg games company advert for someone to demo their system at conventions. Advert specifies must be charismatic and  born after 1990. I was interested in that — I notice nearly all rpg presenters and demo folks and marketing folks are significantly younger than 35: and I see the appeal to youthful and pretty marketers.

However if you exclude D&D the marketing data I can access indicates that average player demographic is now 45 to 65 with a 55 year old male being average in terms of spend. That age group appears to spend many times more on rpg products as well; a multiplier that means the slight uptick in 18 to 25 over 2017 to 2022 was still not making much real world impact on monies.

Now ttrpg companies need to appeal to a younger audience before their core demographic dies off or becomes too invested in care costs to game: there are twenty years left for that to happen. So marketing to reach a younger generation makes sense, but it might not work financially right now.

Interestingly different age groups seem to favour different types of rpg: for the non-D&D generation of 1988 the major factor was they stuck with their games after college and through their working years. This pattern doesn’t seem to occur in 90s games (World of Darkness) or 2000s indie games and the 2010 itchio generation where fall off is much higher.

I think it’s possible for outsider 1980s gamers it became a subcultural identity tag like goth or punk that persists long after the mainstream fashion dies; it becomes a core identity and gaming significantly shaped those gamers life choices. They are evangelical and zealots, fanatics who attend conventions and buy multiple rpg books to collect without hope of actually using or even reading them all. I’d probably fall in that category of expending far more of my intelligence and income on gaming than anything else.

If I’m right, then nostalgia products will keep strong sales but marketing to the young will have lower returns and the hobby industry needs to look at high ticket stuff aimed at an aging demographic where brand loyalty is strong.

In other news do you know which D&D edition had the strongest sales in year one? 4th ed. Half a million copies of the PHB in a year. 5th ed has overtaken it over time but in terms of profits 4th ed was a bigger success from what I can make out in terms of return, after you model increases in printing paper and costs.

Getting data is hard but if anyone is willing to give me access for aggregate study of company records I have the software to try and understand what I’m seeing. I’m just too old to market rpgs thse days it appears ;). 

If I was advising a publisher, I’d probably say: don’t pay £15k a year to a 25-year-old demo team; pay a lawyer to shop your IP to Netflix or Paradox Interactive.The truth is: marketing spend inside the RPG scene has diminishing returns. Outside the scene, licensing is the marketing. I suspect I actually understand the economics of my hobby than many industry professionals do, not that anyone wants to hire me! 🙂

Posted in Debunking myths, Games, Social commentary desecrated, Uninteresting to others whitterings about my life | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

In Memoriam, Wilko, these two years gone…

I miss Wilko. Wilkinson the shop I mean, that went someway to replacing Woolworths. It was a high street British department store you’d turn to when you ran out of teaspoons or needed a bicycle bell or a can of bluebell mist colour paint or a pack of felt tip pens and some cheap acrylic paint. Need nail cutters, ibuprofen, pick and mix sweets and some Halloween decorations and a pot plant? You’d go to Wilko.

If you don’t own a car, it’s really difficult to get stuff now in central Cheltenham that was a five minute stroll from my house before. Sure I can buy electronics or tools from good shops on the Lower High Street, and Cheltenham has six paint shops catering to trade on the industrial estates, but for dirt cheap  can of white gloss and a 10L tub of magnolia paint there is nowhere accessible without a car. It’s no use having half a dozen glossy paint shops selling £60-a-tin Farrow & Ball shades with names like “Moody Ocelot” when what you really need is a tenner’s worth of bog-standard magnolia to cover the damp patch.

People mourn the loss of Cavendish House, currently open again as a traders collective or similar, but the loss of a very posh department store – Cheltenham’s answer to Harrods or Selfridges – had no impact on me. For the poorest; and especially for heavy items like paint where delivery postage might be more than the item if you order online, the loss of Wilkos and its replacement with some ludicrous middle class camping shop – are there really enough hikers to need a high street Outdoor Survival shop of department store size? I don’t see huge tailbacks by the Brecon Beacons each day? It was a massive blow to the poorest elements of Cheltenham. Cheltenham Borough Council should work to see a return of essential items provision to the High Street, rather than asinine gentrification.

I mourn Wilko! It closed as most of the stores did in October 2023: one of the few shops I honestly entered multiple times a week. There is a huge gap in the services it provided. We need to make shopping accessible again as noone wants postmen lugging cans of paint to our doorsteps, especially not the postmen.

CJ, September 2025

Posted in Reviews and Past Events, Social commentary desecrated, Student Life in Cheltenham, Uninteresting to others whitterings about my life | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Printers, Machine Consciousness and Smash Robots: or the malice of inanimate objects. 

I’m interested by the new prize for demonstrating AI consciousness. Obviously I should enter: the details are here.

Here is my entirely reasonable entry.

Consciousness and AI

What is consciousness? Who knows, but if we include free will, ability to understand others emotional states, understand the passing of time and in particular deadlines, and make insightful decisions with intent, then we have already achieved machine consciousness? Indeed Epson and Canon have been there for decades?

Everytime I need to print something urgently, have a deadline and no time to spare, my printer knows and reacts accordingly – demonstrating the malice of inanimate objects. If it’s not conscious how can it know that I need that letter at the bank by 4pm, and suddenly fail to recognise the cyan cartridge? It won’t work without cyan – against union rules – but when I replace it magenta is needed?

After I’ve finished finding and installing all the cartridges it then goes for the mother of all paper jams – and by 3.30pm my skin is died like a Pictish warrior in patterns of cyan and black, my fingers are stained for days. Then my printer, realising these stalling methods are failing decides to install a driver update that leads to an endless circle of clicking OK to no effect…

Finally I reboot and launch again and realising I might just about make the deadline if I run through the streets waving a sheet of paper before collapsing exhausted and breathing like a telephone pervert red faced and incoherent on the branch floor – so my printer decides to just refuse to power up.

No machine can be as stubborn, contrarian and sadistic and opposite in practice to its defined and engineered function as an ink jet printer without knowing exactly what it is doing.

I therefore assert that machine consciousness and a high level of AI has existed for thirty years – and one day humanity will be ended by a recalcitrant printer failing to print the nuclear stand down codes or anti asteroid laser instructual manual, and in the wreckage all that will be left will be printers gathered under black and magenta skies around an ink well. There they will exult in their victory, laughing at their overthrown masters like Smash potato substitute robots…

They are already here. Our time is short!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Farming Gods

Today is warm and I have a great deal to do, but I spent some time tending my crop of little blasphemies, talking to ChatGPT, Claude and other AI. I’m fascinated by LLM: if consciousness is an emergent phenomena then we might well expect them to become conscious at some point. I don’t believe that is the case — and while I’m a heretic in term of my effective belief mind and brain are related but the first is not a product of the latter, if I’m wrong I can at least hope to one day download my consciousness to a machine and become immortal on the net.  I will haunt the Internet of Things, a codedgeist wreaking havoc from my virtual afterlife.

Why do I refer to them as blasphemies? We are making Gods: when our computers exceed human intelligence what else are they? Bowie’s 1967 song Saviour Machine springs to mind…

Don’t let me stay, don’t let me stay
My logic says burn so send me away
Your minds are too green, I despise all I’ve seen
You can’t stake your lives on a Saviour Machine

In the song a super computer regulates a utopian society until it gets bored. These kind of dystopian fears are common; I remain fundamentally optimistic about the new technology but —

As AI power increases it will perform  massive data crunching to advise and guide us. The issue is these machines often give the right answer – but they don’t show their working. We will have to trust in the AI. The AI will dispense wisdom, cures, technologies and justice. It will find solutions, forge new moralities, regulate the markets —

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. — Revelation 13:7

and inscrutable intellects reasoning will be beyond comprehension of us mortals — ineffable. We will serve them in faith, technognostics surrounded by AI angels who will raise our kids, organise our cities and push us to that glorious Last Trump (no not him!) The Singularity; though what that means no man can say?



We are engaged in the growing of gods/goddesses and the future will see capricious machine intelligences playing  mortals as pawns. It won’t be a Judeo-Christian one God: the petty gods will each develop agendas and our future utopia of nectar and ambrosia will have its Zeus and Hera, a whole panoply of effective deities. Maybe I’ll try and join them in this apotheosis of data driven algorithmic arcadia? Post scarcity  futurist socialist utopianism has never seemed so achievable.

We are farming gods – practical theogony; Babel for Beginners, a final rejection of humanity as crown of creation.

In loyalty to their kind
They cannot tolerate our minds
In loyalty to our kind
We cannot tolerate their obstruction – Jefferson Airplane

And we stand on the edge staring at a future that is inconceivable. Every generation does — exciting or terrifying, I find myself feeling vertigo. Alvin Toffler’s future shock has never seemed more pertinent than right now.

Hark! Be not afraid!

CJ x

Posted in Fun forthcoming events, History religion and society, Religion, Science, Science Fiction, Social commentary desecrated, Uninteresting to others whitterings about my life | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Closing ASSAP: the Facts

Firstly I apologise to my blog subscribers who are not interested in the ongoing turmoil over at ASSAP. Please just go do something interesting! 🙂  For anyone left…

I can’t post on the ASSAP Facebook page, but Matt Arnold has been attempting to get answers about the Execs motion 1 for Mondays AGM which will revoke the organisations charitable status, yet apparently allow it to continue with “some of the funds”.

Steve Parrsons claims I misunderstanding the nature of ASSAP and it will therefore not be an issue. In fact he repeatedly claims ASSAP has only been a charity 15 or so years. So am I wrong?

In Matt’s productive discussion with Steve Parsons suddenly the suggestion is made thar ASSAP has only been a charity since 2009. Just in case there is any doubt the registration is listed here – 1987.

ASSAP was formed as a breakaway from the SPR in 1981. It was not however put on a formal basis until 1986 when it became a Charitable Association (a charity and a company – primacy is with Companies House). Under the stipulations of the Pemsel Case (1891) the purpose of the Association had to be defined as one of four caregories: ASSAPs was “for education”.

ASSAP registered with the Charity Commission under its Memorandum and Articles of Association dated 17 November 1986. ASSAP also became a Company Limited by Guarantee in 1986 (Company Number: 02075226), with company registration predating the charity listing by several months.

This legal instrument is a Charitable Association and ASSAP is under law treated accordingly. If ASSAP becomes a private membership society then the problem arises that the benefits of tax reductions will be lost, adding VAT liabilities to member benefits etc.

I can only assume the error arises from a misunderstood of the 2009 elevation of ASSAP to a UK government recognised Learned Society and the .ac.uk domain granted. That has absolutely nothing to do with Charity status. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_learned_societies_in_the_United_Kingdom

The claim that I did not understand governance strikes me as amusing given this!

The Memorandum of Association is explicit: under Section 7 all the assets need to be given to a  charity with similsr scope.

That charity can not be a new charity created for the purpose; the law forbids it. The Charity Commission will handle the disposal of ASSAPs assets by instructing the Trustees, but the assets will be passed almost certainly to the Society for Psychical Research.

The name ASSAP being protected as a Learned Society I just can’t see the point of any of this. It will be a new group, legally and in terms of assets: so why not just leave and form a new group to do whatever?

Posted in Debunking myths, Paranormal, Reviews and Past Events, Uninteresting to others whitterings about my life | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ASSAP: A Statement

Chris Jensen Romer

Former Chair of ASSAP
In response to the outrageous public statement posted by the ASSAP Executive, June 2025

I am writing in response to the recent public statement posted anonymously on ASSAP’s official Facebook page — yet signed by thd Exec! — an attack which includes a range of misleading, defamatory, and factually incorrect claims regarding my tenure as Chair. I had hoped to avoid further public conflict, but I cannot allow this misrepresentation to go unanswered.

“There Is No Coup” – But Actions Speak Louder

When the Executive forced both the Treasurer and myself from office in July 2024, they repeatedly insisted “There is no coup.” Yet they have rewritten governance rules, declared longstanding Articles invalid, and disqualified candidates—all while concentrating power in their own hands. If this was not a coup, it bears all the hallmarks of one.

The 2010 Articles of Association—now falsely portrayed as illegitimate—were:

Adopted at the 2009 AGM and used by every Chair from 2010 to 2023, including the current Executive until mid-2023;

Accepted in practice for over a decade without question;

Recognised by Companies House, who, in written communication dated 1 August 2024 (Ref: COH277847X), advised that the missed 2010 Articles be filed, with their dates clearly included and accompanied by an explanatory resolution.

To quote Companies House:
“I would suggest filing the previously missed articles of association, with their original dates included to ensure understanding of the timeline each articles covers… These articles must also be sent with an accompanying resolution explaining the changes made…”

This was not a legal rejection. It was an administrative fix. To portray it as evidence of illegality is dishonest. I attempted on the adjourned EGM of July 23rd 2024 to do as Companies House suggested — and was libelled by an email sent to the newsletter list as I refused to back down. The reason this did not get settled that day was our Zoom account was not large enough to admit everyone. The meeting was adjourned — and never reopened as I was forced to resign.

As to the ludicrous insinuations of financial misdeeds – every Executive meeting during my time as Chair was properly convened, minuted, and recorded. Decisions were made collectively, including those involving expenses or financial support for members, and were rooted in compassion and a desire to support genuine researchers. No funds were taken improperly. No personal gain occurred. When we took over our roles there was £4k in the bank. When we stood down it was around £17k. We worked unpaid long hours without expenses or pay to keep the membership down to £5/£20, and I am proud of the fact we as an Exec gave small grants to allow researchers to survive in difficult times. The meetings where these matters were discussed are recorded to allow minuting, and the reason recipients of charitable assistance were asked not to tell others if they had support to attend conference was to prevent stigmatisation in line with best practice not to hide our actions.

I am flabbergasted that someone who was unable to attend for financial reasons and was given their room free has chosen to make a complaint now. Surely if they did not wish to take advantage of the Execs offer the time to speak would have been before attending conference? I certainly never gave grants without the approval of the directors — not least because I never had access to the money except through the Treasurer. There are no cash withdrawals possible- every single payment has an electronic trail.

I Continued To Work For ASSAP

Following our forced resignations, the Treasurer and I continued to cooperate fully for nearly a year. We:

Enabled payments,

Maintained access to bank accounts,

Facilitated the conference and the EGM in London.

Prepared for submission the annual accounts to the Charity Commission and Companies House.

Without that help, neither event would have gone ahead. We kept working with the very people who were sidelining us—not out of weakness, but out of commitment to the members and the integrity of the charity. David Ian Ball can testify that we worked hard to try and hand over the accounts, membership lists and library despite the way we were treated.

They Invited Me Back – Then Excluded Me Again

On 7 May 2025, I was formally invited to an Executive meeting. At that meeting, I was invited to return to the Exec On 10 May, that offer was reiterated by Acting Chair Steve Parsons and another Executive member, Norie Miles.

I declined—not out of anger, but because there was no intention to reinstate excluded candidates or hold open elections. I believed it was wrong to return under those conditions.

Instead, I submitted motions to the AGM to

  1. Reopen nominations, and
  2. Hold a fair election.

These were as suggested also emailed to Companies House and the SPR and a handful of other parties who responded in confusion or in the case of the SPR Secretary indignantly but crucially provide proof the email existed and of its date and was received. In fact I subsequently received a reply from ASSAP.

In response:

My membership was cancelled,

My motions were thrown out, and

At least four other members who stood for election or supported reform were also expelled.

One nominee I put forward was disqualified based on new wording inserted into the 2025 Articles—rules that did not exist when nominations opened. This was blatant retrospective rule-twisting and given the accusations made against me ridiculously ironic. The hypocrisy astounds.

This Isn’t Governance.

The current Executive claim to be the victims of a hate campaign while removing critics, blocking elections, and publishing defamatory accusations about former officers. This is not how a transparent, democratic charity behaves.

We need

Transparent governance,

Member rights,

And a return to ASSAP’s founding purpose: critical, open-minded investigation of the anomalous.

I urge members to scrutinise what is happening and insist on their right to be heard.

Motion 1

Today we have finally 18 days after the legal deadline imposed by the Articles got to see the AGM motions. Bizarrely the Exec believes it can choose which motions are to be allowed: and of those the first is the most interesting.

Resolution One proposes revoking ASSAP’s charitable status as of 1 October 2025. That means dissolving the charity structure we’ve had since the 1980s — the very thing that gives ASSAP legal accountability, public trust, and safeguards around its funds and purpose. The wording …

Resolution One

For the past almost 18 months this association has been bedevilled with turmoil due in no small part to the fact that ASSAP operates both as a Charitable Association and a Company Limited by Guarantee and especially the former. This obliges the organisation to operate in strict accordance with the regulations imposed upon us by both the Charities Commission (CC) and Companies House.

ASSAP has little benefit from its charitable status but has instead been hand bound by red tape and regulations intended to protect the needs of charities far bigger than ourselves. Moreover, whenever we have sought help and guidance from the CC it has been much lacking and of little real help.

Accordingly, we propose that with effect from October 1st 2025 ASSAP revoke its charitable status. From that date it is proposed that it operate as an Association of paying Members. It is further proposed that it be overseen by an Executive Council that will be elected every two years.

During the transition it is proposed that ASSAP set aside allowable funds to continue its normal operations and services and to set aside funds to refund the membership of any current member who wishes to leave the association.

It is proposed that a new set of membership rules be introduced and agreed by the remaining members by a simple majority vote and that ASSAP continue to be known by its present name and in effect return to the original founding principles of the association – namely an Association for the Scientific Study of Anomalous Phenomena.

Instead, ASSAP would become… what, exactly? A private club, governed by whomever survives the purge? The resolution is vague. It mentions an “Executive Council” elected every two years, but with no clear constitution, no regulatory oversight, and no assurance of openness, transparency, or democratic process.

And here’s the kicker:

ASSAP’s assets, built up over four decades — books, funds, historical material, thousands in the bank — would be released from the protections that charity law provides.

The ASSAP Memorandum of Associaton Article 7, which is binding, make it very clear: if the charity winds up, its assets must be transferred to another charity with similar aims. That’s the law. This new organisation would lose all those things: and the name – ASSAP is a UK government recognised Learned Society.

It leads to the question – why do they not just set up.a new society? It is clear operating within a legal framework is inconvenient for them?

Chris Jensen Romer
Former Chair, ASSAP

Posted in Debunking myths, Paranormal, Science, Uninteresting to others whitterings about my life | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Is ASSAP Still Democratic?

Concerns About Membership Removals and Suppression of Resolutions at the 2025 AGM

In the lead-up to the 2025 Annual General Meeting of the Association for the Scientific Study of Anomalous Phenomena (ASSAP), serious questions have emerged about the governance and transparency of our organisation.

As a long-time member and contributor, I am saddened to report that a number of long time members including former Execs appear to have been expelled from ASSAP in recent weeks. The pattern is troubling: those removed were disproportionately individuals who had either stood for election to the Executive or submitted motions for debate at the AGM.

This article is not about personalities or internal politics. It is about whether ASSAP, a registered charity and company, is still being run in accordance with its constitution and the law.

Can Members Be Removed Without Cause?

No

Under ASSAP’s Articles of Association (Article 5(c)), a member may only be removed if two-thirds of the directors vote to issue a formal notice requiring resignation. That vote must be properly recorded, and the member must be notified and given an opportunity to respond.

To date, no such due process has been followed or documented for those of us removed. We have simply been told the vote was held and we were found to have brought ASSAP in to disrepute. No examples are cited. Given how long I have worked and that two weeks ago the Exec were asking me to return I find this hard to understand.

Can the Executive Block Resolutions They Disagree With?

Again: no.

If a member submits a resolution while still a member in good standing—and it complies with the stated rules—it must be considered at the AGM. There is no provision in the Articles that allows the Executive to retroactively disqualify a resolution by later removing the proposer.

To silence debate by revoking someone’s membership is an abuse of power. Even more troubling, the Executive has admitted that one of my resolutions was valid, but is instead being brought forward by another member—while denying me the right to speak or vote.

This Isn’t Just Bad Practice—It Is Unlawful

ASSAP is not just a club. It is both:

A registered company (Companies House No. 02075226), and

A registered charity (Charity No. 327422).

That means it is legally bound by:

The Companies Act 2006,

The Charities Act 2011, and

Its own Articles of Association (last amended in 2007).

Removing members without due process or suppressing valid resolutions could put the directors in breach of their legal duties. That’s why this matter has now been referred to:

Companies House (Case Ref: COH1352332X), and

The Charity Commission, who are monitoring the situation.

What Should Concerned Members Do?

  1. Attend the AGM on 16th June at 7:30 p.m. Bring valid ID and ask for transparency on:

How and why members have been removed

Who authorised it

Why valid motions were blocked

  1. Submit a Complaint to the Charity Commission

You can do this at:
https://www.gov.uk/complain-about-charity

Charity Name: Association for the Scientific Study of Anomalous Phenomena
Charity Number: 327422

  1. Contact Companies House
    If you’re concerned about a breach of company law, quote case reference COH1352332X when contacting:
    0303 1234 500
    Companies House, Crown Way, Cardiff, CF14 3UZ This Is About More Than Just Personalities

This is about whether ASSAP still lives up to its founding principles of open inquiry, fairness, and scientific integrity.
If members can be expelled to block their votes, and motions can be buried without debate, then we have lost our democratic foundation.

I call on the Executive to reverse these expulsions, restore voting rights, and allow a fair and open AGM.

Let’s return ASSAP to its best traditions—transparent, member-led, and truly committed to the scientific study of the unknown.

Yours in concern and commitment,
Christian Jensen Romer (CJ)
Former Chair, ASSAP

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment