Professionalism in a Time of Unwellness- Sharing a Journey


Developing and maintaining a wellness framework requires personal investment- even more so when your mental or physical health takes a decided turn for the worse.  You’ve prepared for daily challenges at work by incorporating mindfulness and physical activities like exercise or proper nutrition. You are better at dealing with stress, anxiety  and conflict in the workplace. You’ve adopted wellness techniques to avoid stress, burnout and illness. But how will your wellness framework support you in being the professional you need to be in the face of a frightening diagnosis?

Everything you’ve learned about wellness and lawyer well-being and have assumed will carry you through is now about to be tested.

Medical science allows many of us to continue working in spite of our physical or mental health afflictions. Many of us need to work, driven mainly by economic factors, but sometimes because we identify ourselves by our work. At diagnosis and during treatment we work. We medicate, undergo tests, manage pain, deal with one or many side effects and manage shifting personal relationships. We experience medical absences from work, shorter work hours, dulled mental acuity, daily indignities, emotional moments, stress, and breakups in work and personal relationships— and challenges to our core beliefs.

The hard work of recovery or the emotional and traumatic acceptance of life ending sooner than anticipated— do these excuse or justify unprofessional behavior? Or can they drive a professional response?

In March of 2020 at the age of 59, I was diagnosed with advanced-stage metastatic renal clear cell cancer with bone metastases.  In late May 2020, I underwent spinal surgery to remove a tumor impinging on my spinal nerve and that had fractured vertebrae. In July 2020, I underwent radiation treatments. In August 2020 I began a 2-year chemo and immunotherapy regimen that will end in August 2022.

I immediately and abruptly took extended sick leave which lasted 8 months.

At the time of the diagnosis in 2020, persons like me with this diagnosis and cancer staging were advised that the survival rate is just around 8% at 5 years after the initial diagnosis.

I returned to work in January 2021.

Let’s talk professionalism.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Back, and to the Future


I posted to my blog today, for the first time in years. Humor me. Poke around a bit, please.

Leave a comment

How I got here


We are in the summer slowdown, that time of the year when vacations abound and those of us still in the office get moments to look inward.

In the spring of 1997, I began work as the director of the State Bar’s Pro Bono Project. I was fretting over all the newness and strangeness of that job, of what it was or what it seemed, and which included serving as the staff liaison to what was then the Bar’s Civil Legal Aid Committee (now the Access to Justice Committee). Helping promote volunteerism among lawyers, especially OTP (“outside the perimeter”), to support access to civil justice for Georgians with low-incomes was new to me in job duties, but a clear and dear and obvious “yes” to me in philosophy.

About a month after setting up office at the State Bar, I traveled to St. Louis, MO to attend the American Bar Association Pro Bono Conference. It was the pre-Internet age, so of course to find out my “why” and “how” in this new pro bono position, I had to go to where pro bono people go, and that’s a pro bono conference.

I found my “why” and “how” and I found a life there, one larger than I could have hoped for. I found some larger-than-life mentors, too. And it all happened over chips and wine in a vast and empty meeting room at the Adams Mark hotel in downtown St. Louis.

Pre-chips and wine, I ran into fellow Georgia Bar member Guy Lescault at the conference. Guy is now the ED of the Alabama Legal Services Program. I knew Guy for a brief period before I moved to Atlanta from small-town Tifton, Georgia to take my new job. He ushered- or maybe lured- me into a meeting with some other conference attendees, 9 in all. As we passed the chips and the wine bottles (smuggled into the meeting room after conference attendees turned out the lights), Guy (then at NLADA) and Steve Scudder, an ABA Legal Services Division counsel, articulated the magical agenda and introduced me to some people who changed my life and thinking.

I was given an ultimatum, of sorts: Don’t be a director of pro bono. Use that state platform to promote access to civil justice.

I sat and listened. Mary, Joan, Julie, Nancy, and MaryAnn were enthusiastic and so persuasive. These women were at the forefront of the nascent access to justice movement. Now, years later, it’s a thing and known as the national Access to Justice Chairs with meetings of about 200 justice leaders. But back in 1997, it was just us with chips and smuggled wine, “Bar crap” politics and stories, and ideas and energy. And a Yahoo Group where Mary, Joan, Julie, Nancy, MaryAnn, Monte and I kevetched, brainstormed and passed serious and lighthearted notes about building justice communities in the early days of the Internet. Monte, my counterpart from Louisiana and a newbie as well, was also ushered into that chips and wine meeting.

We called ourselves the “Yahoo 7.” Guy and Steve could not be in the “7.” We were too dangerous, well, maybe only justice naughty.

Nancy Kleeman- that Nancy – was my counterpart at the Minnesota Bar Association. She became my mentor.

Some of us 7 are still around and are retired, in a second act or, like me, looking to pass the baton.

Leave a comment

Georgia’s “Incubator” Up for an Award- Vote for Us!


Lawyers for Equal Justice is a nominee for the 2017 Louis M. Brown Award and is also in the running for Brown Select (which will be presented to the Brown Award nominee that gets the most votes from the general public).

VOTING IS NOW OPEN.  Voting closes at noon CST, January 10th, 2017. We hope that you will vote, as well as encourage others to take a look at the nominees and vote for us.

You can access the Brown Select site here: http://www.americanbar.org/groups/delivery_legal_services/initiatives_awards/louis_m_brown_award_for_legal_access/2017-brown-select.html

 

Leave a comment

Read about Georgia’s new law student practice rule- and access to justice approach


Professor Clark Cunningham,  Professor and W. Lee Burge Chair of Law and Ethics at the Georgia State University College of Law, outlines in the current edition of the Georgia Bar Journal the new law student practice rule recently published by the Supreme Court of Georgia and the Georgia Office of Bar admissions.

Cunningham’s summary of the new practice rules is laid out here:

An entirely new student practice rule was adopted by the Georgia Supreme Court effective August 15, 2015 after a five year review process. Major changes: (1) Students are eligible after the completion of the first year of law school; (2) Client eligibility is changed from indigency to “unable financially to pay” for legal services and non-profit organizations can also be represented if their purpose “is to assist low or moderate income persons” (3) Student practice can be supervised by any member of the State Bar, thus opening up the possibility of student practice in the setting of law firm pro bono work; and (4) While the old rule only referred to “assist[ing]in proceedings” and required authorization by “the court where such authority is to be exercised” the new rule authorizes students to “advise, prepare legal instruments, appear before courts and administrative agencies and otherwise take action” on behalf of an eligible client and authorization is provided through registration with the Office of Bar Admissions.

You can read a complete analysis of the new law student practice rules here.

 

Leave a comment

The Standing Committee on Pro Bono and Public Service Year-in-Review


centerforprobono's avatarABA Center for Pro Bono Exchange

Mary Ryan, Chair, ABA Standing Committee on Pro Bono & Public Service Mary Ryan, Chair, ABA Standing Committee on Pro Bono & Public Service

When I began my term as chair of the ABA’s Standing Committee on Pro Bono and Public Service in 2013 I knew that the Committee had a busy slate of activities.  I had completed a full three year term on the Committee, was honored to be appointed to serve as Chair and was ready to lead the ABA’s pro bono initiatives to the next level.  The scope of the Committee’s efforts has turned out to be even more impressive and impactful than I ever imagined it would be, in both scope and depth.  As 2015 draws to a close, here is a review of the Committee’s work over the past twelve months:

ABA Working Group on Unaccompanied Minor Immigrants

  • Co-sponsor with the ABA Commission on Immigration
  • Developed and implemented training for potential pro bono volunteers in collaboration with…

View original post 956 more words

Leave a comment

My Recent Bar Journal Articles


Here’s a list of links to my recent State Bar of Georgia Bar Journal articles. The upcoming April 2016 edition article is focused on pro bono and law practice management.

February, 2016 Predictions: What’s Hot in Pro Bono for 2016 http://digital.ipcprintservices.com/publication/?i=289893&p=38

December 2015 Lawyering at the Intersection of Poor and Frustrated: A Clinic Approach http://digitaleditions.walsworthprintgroup.com/publication/?i=284826&p=50

October 2015 Local Bar Associations, How Do You #Probono? http://digital.ipcprintservices.com/publication/?i=274578&p=40

August 2015 Eureka Moments http://digitaleditions.walsworthprintgroup.com/publication/?i=268348&p=68

June 2015 Pro Bono Incentives for You http://digitaleditions.walsworthprintgroup.com/publication/?i=260973&p=22

Posted in Justice | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ABA Commission Paper on Legal Check-Ups Could Offer Opportunity to Integrate Private Providers Into ATJ Triage Movement — Richard Zorza’s Access to Justice Blog


A few days ago, the ABA Commission on the Future of Legal Services, fresh from a major step forward in getting House of Delegates approval for their Model Regulatory Objectives, issued for comment a draft Issues Paper Concerning Legal Checkups. While, it is important to note that this is NOT ABA policy, merely a draft […]

via ABA Commission Paper on Legal Check-Ups Could Offer Opportunity to Integrate Private Providers Into ATJ Triage Movement — Richard Zorza’s Access to Justice Blog

Leave a comment

Pro Bono Innovation Grants from the Legal Services Corporation — ABA Center for Pro Bono Exchange


https://player.vimeo.com/video/160391416

LSC 2016 PBI Conference – Innovations in Legal Services from Legal Services Corporation on Vimeo. In this video, Pro Bono Innovation Grants from the Legal Services Corporation are discussed in depth. The panel, Innovations in Legal Services, took place at the Pro Bono Institute’s annual conference on March 24, 2016. LSC President Jim Sandman was […]

via Pro Bono Innovation Grants from the Legal Services Corporation — ABA Center for Pro Bono Exchange

Leave a comment

The Needed Components for National ATJ Initiative Taking


richardzorza's avatarRichard Zorza's Access to Justice Blog

A couple of years ago, I blogged about what a state capacity for access to justice might look like.  Folks might find this post useful to start to talk about evaluation of the progress of their state’s ATJ Commission (or justification for lack of one).

I thought it might now be time to think about what the capacities for national Access to Justice focusing and initiating of activities are needed, particularly when new areas of opportunity arise.

I am not here suggesting how these functions might be fulfilled, or whether or how they should be integrated or divided, rather I suggest them as a way of assessing whether our community is doing all it should in focusing and opportunity-taking terms.

Before the list I would also point out that filling in the gaps in this list, and making sure there is some form of linkage between the elements, would provide…

View original post 551 more words

Leave a comment

The DOJ Access to Justice Research Workshop Is An Important Achievement And A Milestone


richardzorza's avatarRichard Zorza's Access to Justice Blog

The recent Research Workshop was sponsored by NIJ (National Institute of Justice) and ATJ (Access to Justice Initiative) within the Department of Justice, and by the National Science Foundation (NSF).  Attorney General Loretta Lynch both spoke and blogged about it here.  Obviously it is very important for the future that she said this in the post:

Through the Access to Justice Initiative, we’re building partnerships across the country to expand legal aid and rethinking policies that reduce its impact.  Thanks to the Legal Aid Interagency Roundtable, which ATJ helped launch in 2012, more than two dozen federal grant programs—involving health care, citizenship, post-incarceration reentry, housing for veterans, and other federal priorities—have now been clarified to allow funding for legal services to further program goals. And under the Department’s recently-expanded Pro Bono Program, any DOJ employee can now use up to 30 hours of administrative leave for pro bono…

View original post 674 more words

Leave a comment

Rapid California Court Rule Action Shows Momentum is Building on Fines and Fees Issue


Hot topic around the country– debtor’s prisons.

richardzorza's avatarRichard Zorza's Access to Justice Blog

Here is the story.  On May 1, the Fresno Bee ran a story under the headline: ACLU: Traffic-ticket policy by Valley courts unconstitutional.  The core of the story follows:

A court policy of making Valley traffic offenders pay fees upfront in order to challenge a ticket in court is unconstitutional and unfairly impacts low-income residents, the associate director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California said Friday.

In a move to give the public their right to due process, the ACLU has sent letters to Fresno and seven other counties, reminding them that a person’s right to appear in court — even traffic court — should not depend on their ability to pay a fee.

The Bee explained the back ground and significance as follows:

A recent report by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and other advocates found that California traffic courts have saddled millions…

View original post 789 more words

Leave a comment