I know: Stop the internet! This is important!
But, no, look: It’s important to me.
I don’t have an art complex. I have an I-miss-the-one-person-I-could-talk-to-about-art complex.
I actually used to discuss this shit all the time; I just used to discuss it all with my brother, and I can’t anymore.
My brother isn’t dead; he’s just likely going to be, soon. In any case we aren’t speaking, and all I can say about that is, don’t put the blame for that on me. Please really just don’t. You have no idea.
My brother has something. I don’t know what. He has some sort of mental illness, and that’s the best I can quantify it objectively. Also, I’ve just got to say this because I’ve been holding it back for weeks:
You there! Your family member’s disability is not your fucking trump card for you to play because someone insulted one of your bloggy friends. I went from loving some of what you wrote to despising it all because to me, either you get this or you don’t, and if you don’t, I’m never going to like anything you have to say again no matter how smart it is. Sorry! This is where your I-was-a-gifted-child card runs the fuck out.
There is some shit you just don’t do, and whoring out a member of your family in defense of a so-called feminist blogger whose bad reputation is entirely deserved?–is some of that shit.
It’s especially some of that shit if you then use it to segue into how much you support feminists with disabilities. Let people with disabilities tell their own goddamn stories. Is that too much to ask? Do you even have a soul?
Anyway:
Because I don’t think it’s my place to tell my brother’s story for him, I won’t. Just, we’re not speaking, and it’s not for lack of my trying, and I hate it, but not so much that I’m willing to invite more abuse upon myself because let me tell you, internets, dude can be abusive. He’ll remember shit I’ve long since forgot and throw it in my face and I will then live in that shitpile for months. He knows where the buttons are and how hard to push them and, this is important, he doesn’t just do it to me. He does it to all those he claims to love.
But:
He always got where I was coming from with regards to books and music and stuff, and we used to have great conversations that probably would look like knock-down drag-out fights to an outside observer.
I was reminded of this because some dude on Tumblr was babbling about Jeff Buckley tonight, and I remember the general outline of the conversation I had with my brother about Jeff Buckley, and I remember–
I remember I liked it. I don’t like Jeff Buckley, but I liked what we had to say to each other about Jeff Buckley.
He always got where I was coming from. I don’t know how much longer I have to let him know how much that means to me and I don’t know how to get it across to him when he’s convinced, in a way I can’t reach or repair, that I am his enemy.
Is it natural to fear an idea that to make feminism more inclusive, we need to think of all the entities involved as living beings? Logically, instinctively, the answer would be no. But in practice, the answer sounds like a belabored, protracted “Weelllll…”
Okay, first things first: That post? That is a read-the-whole-thing post. And there is other stuff in it I would like to talk about, especially the last line, but right now I have absolutely got to get some things off my chest about that “Weelllll…”
I have got that response by the truckload–and I can’t talk about what happens during or after it, because even if I removed the names and the details, even if I stripped everything down to the barest outline of what occurred, those incidents would still be recognizable to the parties involved, and those parties would then be hurt, and (this is important) their hurt would not be unjustified.
Think about it: You have a conversation with somebody in a relatively private medium and then maybe a day, a week, a month later, you see them posting their rendition of it on their blog. You’re hurt, right? You go, “Wait, wait! If you had this problem with what I said, why didn’t you bring it up to me then? Why did you have to address it in such a shitty, sneaky way?”
And it wasn’t until I read that excerpt up there that I understood: It’s because that “weelllll…” pours over me like heavy syrup. It slows my wit and my reflexes. I don’t bring it up “then” because I can’t even formulate my thoughts right “then.”
That one fuckin’ syllable, said just the right way like that, manages to hit me with so much at once. Mind you, most of this may not even be intended–I am not making any claims regarding what is meant by the speaker using that “Weelllll…” I am describing the effect it has on me. I may hear, feel, sense, or read in any or all of the following:
I’m sure there are more I’m just not recalling right now. I’m too keyed up right now by the realization that this is a thing. Now I should have damn well known it was a thing, obviously, because I have a good deal of privilege, and yet I’m hearing it often enough to wince at it; how often, then, must people with fewer privileges be hearing it? I ought to have known–that much is on me and I feel deservedly stupid about it–but DAMN.
Here, though, is the so-rich-I-could-choke-on-it part:
Nothing that follows that “weelllll” is ever, EVER something I haven’t encountered before. Shit, it’s almost never anything that couldn’t sit comfortably on an oppression bingo card square. It is never a carefully constructed illuminating thought, it is never an original idea, and it is never, ever the unique and special product of a unique and special mind. And, for maximum irritation factor, I know this as I’m hearing it.
The problem is, at the time, I’m trapped in the sticky, oozy, gluey, coagulating MESS of that one. Little. Word. And I can’t react quickly enough to go, “No, now, come on, please, let’s cut the shit. Here is the flaw in what you have just said.” And I can’t hash it out here, either, because that would be mean and would hurt feelings, and I already feel up to my ears in agita as it is.
So all I am going to say is please, before anyone busts that one out at me again: Sit yourself down and ask yourself honestly if any conversation with any man on the planet has ever left you feeling anything but enraged, tongue-tied, and frustrated once he’s started saying, “Weelllll…” I will allow you one exception, on the grounds that there’s almost always an exception, but that’s it. One. You get one. But that word, that pause, I’m convinced, is actually your brain’s way of telling you to slow down and reevaluate.
At 20, I wouldn’t have hesitated an instant. Not an instant! There wasn’t really email then; I guess I’d have picked up the phone instead, or maybe written a letter–fuck, the whole thing makes no sense without the internet, come to think of it–but so long as I’m only supposing, I guess I can neglect accuracy.
My point is, I would have reacted.
I have sort of thrown around the word “codependent” here and there without ever going too much into what I mean by it generally, let alone what it means to me specifically. I don’t feel like getting into definitions right now, but I can sure as hell describe what it feels like for me, personally, to be codependent.
It means I react to stimuli. It means I have a favorite stimulus: Dude Feels Bad About Himself Because Women*. (One of the reasons I think the man I’m with and I have been able to hang together this long is that he doesn’t have this. Mind you, this is also why initially I termed him “not my type.” Oh, well. Sometimes life is better to you than you deserve.)
When that little hotline button lights up, though–I don’t think, I don’t pause, I don’t consider, I don’t reflect. I don’t hear, see, or process anything except:
Someone needs something SOMETHING YOU HAVE must help MUST HELP NOW fix it fix it FIX IT where is your compassion GO GO GO do something WHY AREN’T YOU DOING SOMETHING?
But I’m not 20 anymore. I’ve done some agonizing work on myself. I’ve been blessed to have people in my life who were willing and able to help me with some of that work, even. That’s a lucky thing.
So I still hear the alarm, I still fling myself immediately into crisis mode–
–but then, thank Jesus, I pause. I think. I consider. I reflect. I ask myself really uncomfortable, awkward questions. I try (I don’t always succeed) not to shrink from the answers.
People think I’m hotheaded and reactionary, sometimes, and they’re not wrong, exactly. I AM hotheaded and reactionary sometimes. I will probably tend towards hotheaded and reactionary right up until I am dead.
But if they had any idea how much less hotheaded and reactionary I am now compared to how I used to be, how much less impulsive and manipulative and controlling and Hi, I’m Your Friendly Neighborhood Emergency Psychosocial Services First Responder!, how much less codependent–if they had any idea the difference between me then and me now, they’d be forever thankful they didn’t know me then.
I’m stuck with me–I have no choice but to have known me then. But I cringe in recalling my past self less often now, and most miraculous to me of all, I am learning to pause.
*Other time-tested, well-worn favorite stimuli have included Dude Isn’t Doing a Very Good Job at Recovering from His Meth Addiction; Dude Is Totally Overboard with His Catholicism; Dude Is Still Grappling with His Southern Baptist Upbringing; Dude Got Shot but, Sadly, not by You; Dude Hates His Wife but Can’t Afford Alimony; and the classic one, WOW! Dude’s a Total Fucking Alcoholic!
Lest I mistakenly give the impression that this is strictly based in dudery, please note that there have also been: Girlfriend Denies Her Drug Addiction; Girlfriend Keeps Picking Unhealthy/Unavailable Men and Needs a Shoulder to Cry On; Girlfriend Had a Bad Childhood; Girlfriend Wants You for an Ugly Bridesmaid; Girlfriend Is Actually Your Mom and Doesn’t Understand Why She Can’t Complain to You about That One Time Dad Gave Her Crabs. You get the idea.
I don’t think I hold with this fad of reclaiming “lady.” I particularly don’t think this is something white women want to be doing–or, rather, I fear that it IS something white women want to be doing, and by that I am simply worn out and disgusted. See:
M.E. lafdi, lavede, ladi, from O.E. hlæfdige “mistress of a household, wife of a lord,” lit. “one who kneads bread,” from hlaf “bread” (see loaf) + -dige “maid,” related to dæge “maker of dough” (see dey (1); also compare lord). Not found outside English except where borrowed from it. Sense of “woman of superior position in society” is c.1200; “woman whose manners and sensibilities befit her for high rank in society” is from 1861 (ladylike in this sense is from 1580s). Meaning “woman as an object of chivalrous love” is from late 14c. Used commonly as an address to any woman since 1890s. Applied in O.E. to the Holy Virgin, hence many extended usages in plant names, etc., from gen. sing. hlæfdigan, which in M.E. merged with the nominative, so that lady- often represents (Our) Lady’s; e.g. ladybug. Ladies’ man first recorded 1784.
–it’s been a few centuries since its original meaning of “one who kneads bread” was in use; I think it would be a lot of work to roll it back to that, I doubt that feminism wants to roll it back to that, and in the meantime, “lady” has taken on all these nasty classist and racist connotations that make me scratch my head and ask one of the cats, “Really? Even ironically, tongue-in-cheek, I just–really?”
The cat, of course, has no answers, and neither do I, but a Google image search on “lady” is illustrative, in a mostly monochromatic way, even factoring out the preponderance of results for Lady Gaga. And if she can reclaim “lady,” why can’t we? Well, (1) she is one person, whereas theoretically, at least, we are many women, some of whom may have real issues with the word “lady,” and (2) she is a performer and an artist, not a movement. But here is where the tired realization hits me: Maybe feminism isn’t a movement, either, and “lady” is a perfectly apt descriptor in the setting of a social club for, you know, certain women. Ladies, perhaps.
UPDATE: Oh, God, it just hit me what the even more tired objection is going to be to my tired objection. Haven’t I seen it enough times by now to predict it? It goes something like:
“Well, the word ‘lady’ is traditionally applied to traditionally feminine women so if you hate ‘lady’ you hate ‘femininity’ which means YOU’RE THE REAL SEXIST WHO REALLY HATES WOMEN QED I WIN.”
And, no, fuck you for even trying that. Fuck your ahistoricality and your ignorance right in its imaginary ears. You have to spend at least an hour interrogating the concept of “traditionally feminine” before you step to me with that one. MINIMUM. ONE HOUR. It’s not asking that much. And if it doesn’t occur to you during that time that women have a right to lead as feminine or masculine or androgynous or genderfucking lives as they themselves wish to, or that “traditionally feminine” comes with a 747 full of baggage, most of it in the form of exclusions and limitations and void-where-prohibiteds? If none of this crosses your mind? GIVE IT ANOTHER HOUR. You can do this! I believe in you!
Huh. On the plus side, I feel less tired all of a sudden.
Seeing the approximate amount of money I earned last year BOLDED and ITALICIZED–and you just know, seeing it, that if only we had some way to write Arabic numerals in ALL-CAPS, those would have been broken out too–in order to emphasize LO, THE POVERTY.
Is it wrong of me to feel simultaneously heartened and disgusted by all this company I have lately? Probably! Y’all can still stop by to borrow a cup of beer or a pound of lard, though. No hard feelings. We’re cool.