What does it mean for something to be “inerrant”? Well, the Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘inerrant’ (an adj.) as: “That does not err; free from error; unerring.” Notice, “free from error”. And just to be complete, ‘perfect’ (an adj) is defined as “In a state of complete excellence; free from any imperfection or defect of quality; that cannot be improved upon; flawless, faultless.” Notice, “flawless, faultless” and “free from ANY imperfection”. This means that even the slightest error is enough to show something claimed to be inerrant to not be so.
This brings a recent example to mind.
Recently I have been in a discussion with an individual who claims that bible is nothing less than the perfect, inerrant word of his god (presumably Yahweh). I pointed out the passage 1 Kings 7:23 which states: “He made the Sea of cast metal, circular in shape, measuring ten cubits from rim to rim and five cubits high. It took a line of thirty cubits to measure around it.” This passage claims that they made a circle with diameter of 10 and a circumference of 30. If one recalls, pi=C/d=30/10=3. This statement is 100% false, even at the time 1 Kings was written. How do we know this? Well, pi was known to the Babylonians to be at least 3.125 in circa 2000BC (Source: http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~huberty/math5337/groupe/overview.html).
Thus showing the bible, containing at least one error (oh and there are plenty more) and is therefore not inerrant.
As the say in math.
Q.E.D.
Backside (Originally, chiefly Amer. English), The female genitals. (Chiefly British English.)