Re: LUA oddities..

[Patrick Masotta <masottaus@...>]

>"it would be a _different_ language".

why is so hard for you guys to take the criticism? then LUA is perfect and if we have to change anything it has to be done on a different implementation???

 

I like to write LUA, and if that is "irritating" to you, well... you probably need to reconsider a couple of things...

 

--- On Mon, 6/18/12, steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:

From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: LUA oddities..
To: "Lua mailing list" <lua-l@lists.lua.org>
Date: Monday, June 18, 2012, 3:59 AM

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I still think LUA would be a better language addressing these oddities
> I’ve mentioned.

More correct to say "it would be a _different_ language".  You are
welcome to patch Lua to make it work like it should, people are pretty
relaxed about that around here.

steve d.

PS Please don't keep saying LUA, it's irritating and incorrect.