[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Idea for a new kind of require
- From: Rob Hoelz <rob@...>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 19:21:47 +0200
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:32:22 +0200
Rob Hoelz <[email protected]> wrote:
> That *could* end up being the final syntax; I haven't decided yet.
> Consistency would be nice, but I'll end up mixing if it means the
> implementation is simpler.
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:46:43 -0500
> Javier Guerra Giraldez <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Rena <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I really like how you can do "require 'foo'" or "require:xyz
> > > 'foo'". I may have to steal that idea.
> >
> > why i don't get is why to use "require:xyz 'foo'" instead of
> > "require.xyz 'foo'"
> >
>
For interesting parties, I have started development:
https://github.com/hoelzro/lua-require
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
