Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?

[Sergey Zakharchenko <doublef.mobile@...>]

Hello,

Ulrich Schmidt <u.sch.zw@gmx.de>:
> Oliver Kroth <oliver.kroth@nec-i.de>:
> >I would even go further and skip the local in that case (as Dibyendu
> >Majumdar did):
> >
> >constant x = 5
> >scoped f = ...
>
> I like this Idea, no matter what keywords we finally choose.

The extensibility of the current 5.4 syntax will then be done with, and we'll be firmly on the road to Java with 50+ reserved words:)

Best regards,

--
DoubleF