Just so both of my beloved fans can know.

http://marginalizedactiondinosaur.net is back!

Not only that the thought crimes continue @ a new bluehost subdomain

if you are looking at the old site you may have noticed that you are being popped over here or get a real weird index which is better than the 500 error seems the subdomains are working too.

Everything except my blog that both of my homies like so much.

should be back soon, today, tomorrow err well who knows…..

In the Middle East, but especially Islam, the concealment of belief, as a method of self-protection. Taqiyya is allowed, and performed, when necessary to avoid death or injury to oneself or other Muslims. Taqiyya is mainly considered as a part of Shi’i theology or modern-day Islamism.
Taqiyya may be translated with ‘fear’ and ‘caution’. It is closely related to the term katm or kitman, ‘concealment’. Taqiyya is in many cases linked with regulations of how Muslims should act with non-Muslims.
The rules concerning the true intention of taqiyya are strict, and abusers of taqiyya will be punished by God.
The permission to conceal the faith is believed to be admitted by the Koran:

Koran sura 16: The Bee
108 … unless it be one who is forced and whose heart is quiet in the faith…

Koran sura 3: Imran’s house
27 … If you hide that which is in your breasts, or if you show it, God knows it…

Some interpret Muhammad to have performed taqiyya, too, when migrating to Yathrib (later Madina) instead of risking his life staying in Mecca. This interpretation may seem doubtful, but has importance with Muslims in order to legitimize taqiyya. It must be stressed that the two Koran verses above seem to allow acts of taqiyya; they even seem to allow it indiscriminately, meaning that it is up to the individual to decide when it is fit to conceal all or parts of his/her faith.

http://i-cias.com/e.o/taqiyya.htm

Quebec,

Part of the reason for this is the frankly disastrous state of Charest’s government. In the past two years, the government has lurched from one scandal to the next, from political financing to favouritism in the provincial daycare system to the matter of Charest’s own (long undisclosed) $75,000 stipend, paid to him by his own party, to corruption in the construction industry. Charest has stymied repeated opposition calls for an investigation into the latter, prompting many to wonder whether the Liberals, who have long-standing ties to Quebec’s construction companies, have something to hide. (Regardless, this much is true: it costs Quebec taxpayers roughly 30 per cent more to build a stretch of road than anywhere else in the country, according to Transport Canada figures.) Quebecers want to believe Bellemare, it seems, because what he says is closest to what they themselves believe about their government.

http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/24/the-most-corrupt-province/

If you read all the way through it and you should it’s interesting Querbec isn’t the most corrupt part of Canada but the commonwealth,

Those who’ve read Canadian history know the corruption played no small part in the over runs in cost @ louisberg in Nova Scotia, or Dearest Wolfe knowing what date the guard would be absent from the cliffs adjacent to the planes of Abraham.

The House of Commons censures Maclean’s

by Aaron Wherry on Wednesday, September 29, 2010 7:56pm – 78 Comments

This evening the House of Commons unanimously passed a motion censuring this magazine. The following is the submitted text of that motion.

That this House, while recognizing the importance of vigorous debate on subjects of public interest, expresses its profound sadness at the prejudice displayed and the stereotypes employed by Maclean’s Magazine to denigrate the Quebec nation, its history and its institutions.

Independent MP Andre Arthur reportedly objected to the motion, then left the chamber, allowing the motion to be re-introduced and passed.

http://twitter.com/#%21/davidakin/status/25925052915
House of Commons now there’s a team that does not care for free speech.  Course they say they do but you just can’t say anything they don’t like. Which is essentially the same as Stalins and Hitlers view on free speech.

Those organizations that denigrate or hate Christians, whites, anglos, farmers, stay at home moms, red necks etc presumably deserve more funding for tax spenders from tax payers I’ve yet to hear the HOC censure one.

When did anyone care about the decades of stereo types of me?

Never,

Can we censure the endophobic bigots at the CBC? or  at the Winnipeg Free Press, Toronto Star, CUPE, etc.  Nope they are progressive bigots so their actions are always acceptable.

Whoever voted for this sucks, but I’m sure there’s a glint in the eyes of Hitler, Che and Stalin as they look up from the flames this morning. Like them the house of commons says you have the right to free speech as long as you agree with the current truth.

Paul Martin was wrong you can cherry pick charter rights! Because the House of Commons is taking a run at Macleans’s charter right 2 freedom of the press, expression and all that.  remember Paul and all the liberals saying you cannot cherry pick charter rights? Well now his party have most certainly just proven that you can, seems they voted for this en masse.

Remember if they can vote to take away Macleans rights to free speech we can do it to the left too.  I mean the left gets ballistic if you take away Robin Sharpe’s right to child porn or pull funding from some government run anti Canadian agency.

The House of Commons just cherry picked and took away Macleans FUNDAMENTAL freedoms. Shame on the thugs.

1 person in the HOC doesn’t suck today MP Andre Arthur.

One.

http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/09/29/house-of-commons-censures-macleans/

I see someone coming here from the CBC gave me a bad rating, boo hoo.

In other news

The Government of Canada does not, of course, observe International Free Press Day but it does celebrate Islamic Heritage Month

http://www.steynonline.com/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,33/

Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion flatly rejected forming a coalition government with the New Democrats today on the heels of hints from NDP Leader Jack Layton that he’d be open to the idea.

Mr. Dion, speaking after an address to a Vancouver-area business crowd today, said he could not work with Mr. Layton in this way because the NDP leader wants to hike taxes on business.

“We cannot have a coalition with a party that has a platform that would be damaging for the economy. Period,” the Liberal leader said.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/article710856.ece

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/09/29/ignatieff-coalition-finley-ei.html

If you go there now the current truth has changed the story it’s about EI.  I guess the original is supposed to go down the memory hole and they did turf it before Google cache got a hold of it.

We have always been at war with Eastasia.

http://www.markosweb.com/www/marginalizedactiondinosaur.net/#