Swedish Parliament’s Committee on Finance had appointed a committee to conduct an external evaluation of the central bank. The committee members were Morten O. Ravn (of University College London) and Carolyn A. Wilkins (of Princeton University).
The review report was submitted recently. Summary:
Our assessment draws on three complementary analytical approaches. First, we adopt a historical perspective, recognizing that Sweden’s macroeconomic framework, shaped by reforms implemented after the early 1990s crisis, continues to influence today’s policy choices. Second, we ground our evaluation in economic theory, empirical evidence, and comparative experience, drawing on lessons from peer central banks. Third, we incorporate qualitative insights from extensive interviews with policymakers, Riksbank staff, academics, and market participants, which helped us understand how decisions were made under uncertainty and how the policy framework functions in practice.
Throughout the evaluation period, the central question is whether the Riksbank achieved its objectives while maintaining credibility, managing risks, and coordinating effectively with other institutions. Sweden entered the period with a strong institutional foundation. This included an established inflation-targeting regime, stringent fiscal rules, a separate macroprudential authority at the Finansinspektionen (the FSA), and a National Debt Office (the NDO) responsible for debt management and crisis-liquidity operations. Even so, experiences over the decade considered in this evaluation exposed some shortcomings in how monetary-policy and other authorities interact, even in times of crisis.
Overall, we find that the Riksbank acted with determination in exceptionally challenging circumstances, and many decisions were reasonable given the information available. With the benefit of hindsight, some weaknesses and areas of underdevelopment are now evident: the scale and composition of QE; limitations in risk assessments, including implications for the balance sheet and capital needs; forecasting weaknesses; and gaps in the relationship between monetary policy, fiscal policy, and debt-management authorities.
Taken together, these issues call for targeted reforms, not a wholesale redesign of Sweden’s monetary policy framework.
Central Bank welcomed the findings:
“Transparency and continuous evaluation are central to building confidence in the Riksbank’s mission. The Committee on Finance’s external evaluation is an important contribution to the Riksdag’s work on following up monetary policy and the objective set for the Riksbank. We will now go through the report carefully and return with our comments on the conclusions in connection with the Committee on Finance’s hearing on the report on 17 February and in our coming statement”, says Governor Erik Thedéen.
In autumn 2024, the Committee on Finance decided to conduct an external review of the monetary policy conducted by the Riksbank in the years 2015-2024. This is the Committee on Finance’s fifth external evaluation of monetary policy in a longer-term perspective. These evaluations are a complement to the Committee on Finance’s own annual reviews and its open hearings with the Governor and Deputy Governors of the Riksbank.
RBI’s monetry policy should also be reviewed by external experts.