Immortality

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

The Sleeping Architects Within Us
Humans carry immortal genes—sleeping blueprints of regeneration And is it waiting for the right signal to awaken?
The immortal jellyfish, Turritopsis dohrnii, can reverse its life cycle, transforming from an adult back into a juvenile state when stressed. Planarian flatworms can regenerate an entire body from a fragment smaller than a grain of rice. Axolotls regrow limbs, spinal cords, and even parts of their brains without scars.

These creatures do not invent new cells. They re-activate genetic programs already written into their DNA.

Science tells us something astonishing: humans share many of the same genes responsible for regeneration.And also they have some genes which no other animals carry.

So the question is not whether we have regenerative genes. The real question is why ours are silent.
Imagine the human genome as a vast library.

Most of us live our lives reading from just one shelf—the genes for survival, growth, repair, and aging. But deeper in the library are sealed rooms. Inside them lie ancient instructions: limb regrowth, organ renewal, the capacity to become superhuman and cellular rejuvenation.

Evolution, under pressure to favor speed and reproduction, may have locked these rooms. Rapid healing was replaced with scar formation. Regeneration was traded for efficiency.

But locks are not deletions.

They are permissions waiting to be changed.Waiting for right biopsychosocioenviornment.

The Environment as a Key

Modern epigenetics has already shattered the old belief that genes are destiny.

We now know that environment can turn genes on or off. Stress can accelerate aging. Nutrition, temperature, and toxins reshape gene expression. Belief, meditation and expectation affect neurochemistry.

In controlled experiments, meditation has been shown to alter inflammatory gene expression. Visualization changes motor cortex activity as if muscles were physically moving. Placebo effects trigger real biochemical changes, sometimes even shrinking tumors.

If environment can whisper to genes, what happens when consciousness speaks?

The Hypothesis of Conscious Activation

Now we step into the foctoon realm.

Imagine that consciousness is not just a byproduct of the brain, but a biological signal—a field capable of influencing cellular behavior.

Every cell listens. Every gene responds to patterns.

Thoughts are not abstract. They are electrical impulses, chemical cascades, and electromagnetic rhythms. Meditation changes brain waves. Visualization synchronizes neural networks. Deep focus alters heart coherence.

What if sustained states of awareness create internal environments powerful enough to unlock suppressed genetic circuits?

Not instantly. Not magically. But gradually—like warming frozen code.

The Story of the Regenerator

In a future research institute, scientists notice something strange.

A group of long-term meditators shows unusual healing rates. Scar tissue dissolves faster. Telomeres shorten more slowly. One man regrows cartilage in a knee doctors once said was permanently damaged.Some yogis from India, found to have more gama waves in their brain waves, can suppress all biologicaly activity in such way that no external instruments could detect any signs of life.
I am talking about the innate hidden ablities of humanbeings.
There is no gene editing. No implants. Only disciplined inner practice.

The data does not scream miracle. It whispers permission.

Cells begin expressing proteins normally active only in embryos. Growth factors appear where none should exist. Stem-cell-like behavior emerges in adult tissues.

The conclusion is radical: human biology may be programmable—not just chemically, but consciously.

Visualization as Biological Rehearsal

Athletes already use visualization to improve performance. Muscles strengthen slightly even without movement. Neural pathways rehearse reality before it happens.

Now scale that inward.

What if visualization trains cells the way rehearsal trains the brain?

In this model, meditation creates a low-noise cellular environment. Focused intention stabilizes signaling pathways. Repeated imagery reinforces genetic activation loops. The body begins to expect regeneration.

Expectation, after all, is one of biology’s most powerful drugs.

The Return of the Architect Genes

In the foctoon future, humans do not grow back limbs overnight.

But organs slowly repair themselves. Livers regenerate more efficiently. Spinal injuries partially reverse. Aging becomes negotiable.

Doctors prescribe nutrition, environmental tuning, and consciousness training.

Healing becomes a collaboration between will and cell.

The ancient architect genes—once silenced—do not make us immortal in the mythical sense. They make us resilient, adaptive, and self-renewing.

Not gods.

But gardeners of our own biology.

The Final Thought

Perhaps regeneration was never lost.

Perhaps it was postponed until intelligence matured enough to wield it responsibly.

And perhaps consciousness—the very thing we once believed was least physical—is the master key evolution hid in plain sight.

The next stage of human evolution may not come from laboratories alone, but from stillness, imagination, and the quiet moment when a cell finally hears us say:

You may begin.

I Mind The Mind ( IMTM ), a charitable trust

Tariff

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

Tariffs as Weapons: Trump’s Use of Economic Pressure in Global Politics In recent years, global politics has witnessed a shift in how economic tools are used as instruments of power. One of the most prominent examples is U.S. President Donald Trump’s approach to international relations, where tariffs and trade threats became tools of political coercion rather than instruments of balanced economic policy. His stance toward the European Union, Denmark over Greenland, and India for its ties with Russia illustrates a broader pattern of using economic leverage to influence the sovereign decisions of other nations. Trump’s trade policy consistently blurred the line between economics and diplomacy. Traditionally, tariffs are imposed to protect domestic industries or address trade imbalances. Under Trump, however, they evolved into punitive measures aimed at pressuring allies and rivals alike. This approach weakened confidence in global trade norms and disrupted long-standing alliances. The European Union became a major target of this strategy. In 2018, the Trump administration imposed tariffs of 25 percent on steel and 10 percent on aluminum imports from the EU, citing national security concerns. These tariffs affected billions of dollars’ worth of European exports. When European leaders supported Denmark’s sovereignty during the Greenland controversy, the backdrop of ongoing tariff pressure reinforced the perception that economic punishment could follow political disagreement. Rather than diplomatic engagement, economic intimidation became the preferred response, undermining principles of mutual respect and international law. India also experienced this coercive approach. In 2019, the United States withdrew India’s benefits under the Generalized System of Preferences, affecting exports worth around 5.6 billion dollars. Trump repeatedly warned of higher tariffs on Indian goods while criticizing India’s defense and energy ties with Russia. Using tariff as a diplomatic tool to influence India’s independent foreign policy decisions, disregarding its historical security partnerships and strategic autonomy. This style of diplomacy sets a dangerous precedent. When tariffs are used as weapons, global trade becomes unstable, smaller economies face disproportionate pressure, and multilateral institutions are weakened. Allies begin to view economic interdependence as a liability rather than a partnership, accelerating fragmentation in the global order. Moreover, such coercive tactics contradict the principles of a rules-based international system. Instead of negotiation and consensus, economic bullying replaces diplomacy, increasing the likelihood of retaliation, trade wars, and long-term economic damage for all parties involved, including the United States. In conclusion, Trump’s use of tariffs as political weapons against the European Union, India, and other nations reflects a confrontational and short-term approach to global leadership. While it may project domestic strength, it erodes trust, strains alliances, and destabilizes international economic relations. Sustainable global leadership requires cooperation, respect for sovereignty, and diplomacy rather than threats disguised as trade policy.Estimated U.S. tariff figures on key countries/regions under the Trump administration’s tariff policy: 1. Canada• Baseline and negotiated tariffs on Canadian goods have varied under Trump-era policies. • Reports indicate tariffs on Canadian imports (non-USMCA goods) at around 35% in some versions of the tariff rollout. 2. Latin American Countries • Latin American nations generally faced the baseline 10% tariff under the broad April 2025 tariff policy. • Specific higher tariffs have not been widely documented for all Latin American countries collectively as of available data, but Brazil has been cited separately (see below). 3. India • Trump announced increased tariffs on Indian imports, with reported bilateral tariffs around 26% to 75%. 25% for not reducing tariff on American goods25% for trade with Russia25% for trade with Iran 4. European Union (and Allies) • Under Trump’s broader tariff strategy, the European Union faced tariffs of around 20% on many traded goods as of mid-2025. • In early 2026 tariff threats tied to political disputes (e.g., Greenland) included 10% tariffs increasing to 25% unless political conditions were met. 5. Denmark (and Related European Allies)• Specifically tied to the Greenland dispute, Denmark and several European allies were targeted with a 10% tariff beginning February 2026, slated to rise to 25% by June 2026 if political conditions were unmet. 6. Iran• While Iran itself is subject to U.S. sanctions and trade restrictions (and not typically part of normal tariff schedules), recent Trump administration announcements included a 25% tariff on imports from any country trading with Iran as a punitive measure.

Summary Table (Approximate Tariff Levels) Country / Region Approx. U.S. Tariff Rate.

Canada ~35% on non-USMCA goods Latin American Countries (general) ~10% baseline

India ~26–75% European Union ~20% (baseline policy)

Denmark (Greenland dispute tariff) 10% rising,to 25%.

History of America

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

The ancestors of Indigenous Americans migrated from Northeast Asia, particularly Siberia. This migration occurred approximately 15,000 to 25,000 years ago. They crossed into the Americas via the Bering Land Bridge, also known as Beringia, which once connected Siberia and Alaska during the Ice Age. Over thousands of years, these populations spread throughout North and South America. They were mistakenly called “Red Indians” by Christopher Columbus, an Italian explorer sailing under the Spanish crown. After Columbus’s voyages in 1492, the early European settlers in what later became the United States were mainly from Britain, especially in the regions that formed the Thirteen Colonies. British settlers, including the English, Scottish, Scots-Irish, and Welsh, formed the largest group in early colonial America. Major British settlements included Jamestown, founded in 1607 in Virginia, and Plymouth, founded in 1620 in Massachusetts. The English language, the common law system, and many political institutions in the United States have their roots in British traditions.They killed millions of red indians as they did in India, later, under their colonial governance. And they invited Europeans. The cost of the land was so cheap at that time. And they were in need of various skilled workers.

However, the British were not the only settlers.

The Spanish settled large parts of Florida, the Southwest, Texas, and California.

The French established settlements along the Mississippi River, the Great Lakes region, and Louisiana.

The Dutch founded New Amsterdam, which later became New York.

German immigrants arrived in significant numbers later. Early German settlers in America concentrated mainly in Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley, North Carolina, and the Hudson Valley region of New York.

Africans were forcibly brought to America through the transatlantic slave trade and became a foundational part of American society.

In summary, early Americans are European descent and were predominantly British, but from the beginning, America was ethnically and culturally diverse, shaped by multiple peoples through both voluntary migration and forced displacement.

Inner death

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

What does “Inner Death” mean in spirituality?

Inner death does not mean physical death, self-denial, or despair. In spirituality, it refers to the death of a false sense of self—the ending of mistaken identities we carry about who we are. It is the dissolution of ego and pride, the sense of excessive doership such as believing “I control everything,” fixed self-images and roles, and old psychological identities formed from success, failure, pain, or status. In short, it is the death of the false “I,” not the real self. What Inner Death is not It is important to understand that inner death is not depression, not withdrawal from life, not self-hatred, and not suicidal thinking. Inner death happens when awareness expands, not when it collapses. How does Inner Death happen? Inner death cannot be forced. It happens naturally when certain inner attachments loosen. Some practices can support this process.

1. Letting go of self-images Notice the stories you repeatedly tell yourself, such as “This is who I am,” “I can never change,” or “I already know how things are.” When these rigid self-definitions loosen, a small inner death occurs.

2. Experiencing pain without turning it into a story Instead of narrating pain as “This always happens to me,” simply feel the sensation in the body and mind. When the story dies, the ego weakens.

3. Softening the sense of doership Let go of the belief that you alone are responsible for everything. See life as a process rather than a personal battle. This feels threatening to the ego, almost like death.

4. Practicing silence Spend time without explaining, judging, or searching for answers. Just remain present. For the mind, silence feels like death. For awareness, it feels like space.

5. Saying “I don’t know” honestly One of the deepest inner deaths is genuinely admitting, “I don’t know.” When the need to appear knowledgeable dies, wisdom begins.

What happens after Inner Death?

There is a sense of lightness, naturalness, reduced emotional reactivity, and a peaceful relationship with life. You do not become less alive. You become more alive. In one sentence Inner death is the letting go of everything you thought you were, so that life can be lived more freely and authentically.

Opinion

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

The Illusion of Opinion in a Living World

From an existential perspective, our opinions—about ourselves or about others—carry no real significance. An opinion is merely something we fabricate: a conclusion we draw at a particular moment, based on limited perception and past conditioning. Yet existence itself is never static. It is in constant movement, changing from one moment to the next. What you believe to be true now may already be obsolete in the very next instant.

Life is not a fixed object that can be defined once and for all; it is a living process. However, the human mind has a tendency to freeze this process into rigid ideas and labels. We form opinions because they give us a sense of certainty and control. But this certainty is artificial. When we try to impose static conclusions on a dynamic reality, conflict arises. This is where suffering begins.

The moment we cling to strong opinions—“This is who I am,” “This is how others are,” “This is how life should be”—we start resisting life as it actually unfolds. Existence refuses to conform to our mental frameworks. As a result, frustration, disappointment, and emotional pain become inevitable. In essence, suffering is the price we pay for trying to make a flowing river stand still.

Existential philosophy invites us to see this clearly: opinions are not truths; they are temporary constructions. They may help us navigate certain situations, but when we mistake them for reality itself, they imprison us. Life, in its nature, demands openness rather than conclusions.

This understanding calls for a different way of living. Instead of forming opinions, we can cultivate sensitivity—an ability to experience people and situations as they are in this moment. The person standing before you now is not the same person they were yesterday, and neither are you. To approach life with fixed judgments is to miss its freshness.

The same applies inwardly. When we decide, “I am this kind of person” or “I will always be that way,” we close the door to transformation. Existentially, the self is not a finished product; it is an ongoing possibility. By refusing to define ourselves rigidly, we allow growth, learning, and change to happen naturally.

To live existentially, then, is to remain open—to yourself, to others, and to life itself. It means meeting each moment without the burden of past conclusions. This does not make life uncertain; it makes it alive.

In the end, the way to conduct life is to align with how life is made: fluid, evolving, and endlessly open. When opinions fall away, experience deepens. And when experience deepens, suffering loosens its grip.

Trump got nobel prize

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

Trump had been trying to win the Nobel Peace Prize for many years. He attempted to bring South Korea and North Korea together and even visited North Korea, becoming the first American president to do so. He intervened to stop an attack between India and Pakistan. He also tried to resolve the Israel–Palestine conflict and made efforts to end the Russia–Ukraine war.
He did everything possible, but the prize was awarded to Machado.
In an unexpected political moment this week, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado presented her 2025 Nobel Peace Prize medal to U.S. President Donald Trump during a private meeting at the White House on January 15, 2026. The symbolic gesture came amid ongoing geopolitical shifts and intense diplomatic maneuvering involving Venezuela and the United States.

Machado, who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last October for her efforts to promote democracy and peaceful transition in Venezuela, framed the presentation as a gesture of gratitude for Trump’s perceived support for Venezuelan freedom. She drew a historical parallel, likening her action to the early 19th-century act of French general Lafayette giving Simón Bolívar a medal bearing George Washington’s image, symbolizing the shared struggle for liberty in both nations.

In a post on Truth Social following the meeting, Trump described the exchange as a “wonderful gesture of mutual respect,” thanking Machado for the presentation and acknowledging her efforts. A framed plaque containing the medal was displayed, inscribed with a message of gratitude for Trump’s leadership in promoting peace and defending freedom.

However, officials from the Norwegian Nobel Committee quickly reaffirmed that the Peace Prize is not transferable. Under Nobel Foundation statutes, once a prize is awarded, it cannot be revoked, shared, or transferred to another person. While Machado can physically hand over her medal, the title of Nobel laureate remains hers alone.

The gesture comes at a critical moment in Venezuelan politics. The United States recently supported a covert operation that led to the capture of longtime Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, a move that has thrust the country into turmoil. Yet, Trump’s administration has favored interim leadership under Delcy Rodríguez—Maduro’s former deputy—over Machado’s own claim to leadership, drawing criticism from some opposition supporters.

Analysts view Machado’s decision as both symbolic and strategic. By presenting her Nobel medal to Trump, she appears to be appealing for stronger U.S. backing for her political future and a more definitive commitment to democratic transition in Venezuela. Critics argue the action risked diminishing her standing domestically, as Trump did not immediately endorse her leadership aspirations.

This rare transfer of a Nobel medal highlights the complex interplay of international recognition, personal ambition, and geopolitical strategy. Regardless of political interpretations, the incident has reignited global conversation about the meaning of peace awards in contemporary diplomacy and the often blurred line between symbolic gestures and substantive policy outcomes.

Any way , Machado satisfied Trump’s long-lasting ambition. Now he can even give the medal to Melania, who has been his wife for many years

Optimism

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

Optimism in Trade relation

The situation is interesting. When Europeans speak of Asia, they often think of India. However, in the context of trade, when they say Asia, they usually mean China.

Although many Europeans—especially Germans—hold a negative view of China because of its close ties with Russia, its historical practices such as the consumption of dogs and cats, and because China has been accused of being the source of the COVID epidemic, the global trade situation is now changing.

India and the European Union (EU) are very close to finalizing a comprehensive free trade agreement (FTA) that would deepen economic ties and expand market access for both sides.

Negotiators from both sides have been working on the deal for several years, and discussions are in the final stages, aiming for a conclusion around late January 2026.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Indian leaders have indicated that the deal could be signed soon, possibly during a high-level summit in India.

Expected Signing Timeline

Reports suggest that the pact may be concluded by late January 2026, coinciding with the India–EU Summit in New Delhi and Republic Day events (January 26–27).

What the Deal Includes

The agreement under negotiation is expected to be one of the EU’s largest trade agreements once signed. It will cover goods and services and deepen economic cooperation, although sensitive issues such as agriculture and carbon taxes remain under discussion.

Agricultural products like dairy and sugar may be excluded due to political sensitivities, but many other sectors are likely to benefit from tariff reductions and improved market access.

When It Would Take Effect

Even after signing, such trade deals usually require ratification by EU member states and the European Parliament, which means it may take a year or more before the agreement fully enters into force.

A fear Wave in Europe

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

A Growing Fear Wave in Europe: Security Anxiety in the Shadow of Russia

Across Europe, particularly in Germany, a growing sense of insecurity is becoming increasingly visible. This fear is not the result of sudden panic but has developed gradually through a series of geopolitical signals that suggest Europe may be entering a more unstable and uncertain security environment. At the center of this anxiety lies the possibility of an expanded confrontation between Russia and NATO.

One of the most concerning developments is the rise of hybrid warfare. Modern conflict no longer relies solely on tanks and troops crossing borders. Instead, it increasingly unfolds through cyberattacks on government systems and critical infrastructure, disinformation campaigns that undermine public trust and democratic processes, interference with satellite communication and navigation systems, and acts of sabotage targeting undersea cables and energy infrastructure. These actions often remain below the threshold of declared war, making it difficult to respond decisively while still generating constant psychological pressure. For many Europeans, this creates the unsettling feeling that conflict has already begun, even if it is not openly visible.

The Baltic Sea region has emerged as a particular point of concern. It holds major strategic importance due to the presence of NATO member states, vital energy pipelines, internet cables, and key trade routes. Its proximity to Russia, including the heavily militarized Kaliningrad region, adds to the tension. Any disruption in this area, whether intentional or accidental, carries the risk of escalation, intensifying anxiety among governments and citizens alike.

Germany’s reaction to these developments is especially significant. For decades after the Second World War, Germany placed its trust in diplomacy, economic interdependence, and external security guarantees. Today, there is a noticeable psychological shift. Public discussions increasingly focus on military readiness, defense spending, civil protection, and emergency preparedness. This change is not driven by militaristic ambition but by a growing realization that the long period of assumed peace and stability in Europe may no longer be assured.

Another major source of unease is the changing role of the United States in European security. While the United States remains a NATO ally, shifting political priorities, domestic challenges, and a strategic focus on other global regions have led Europeans to question the reliability and consistency of American security commitments. This uncertainty has strengthened calls for greater European strategic autonomy and closer defense cooperation within Europe itself.

Security fears are further amplified by economic and energy vulnerabilities. Dependence on external energy supplies, rising living costs, inflation, and broader economic uncertainty all contribute to a heightened sense of instability. When economic stress coincides with geopolitical tension, public anxiety deepens, even in the absence of immediate military conflict.

Fear itself has become a powerful psychological and strategic factor. Persistent uncertainty can weaken social cohesion, erode trust in institutions, and make societies more vulnerable to polarization and manipulation. A population that feels constantly threatened is easier to destabilize, even without direct confrontation.

Europe now faces a critical moment of choice. The challenge is not only military or strategic but also psychological and moral. The continent must find ways to strengthen its defenses while preserving democratic values, to remain vigilant without succumbing to paranoia, and to promote unity without fueling fear.

Whether or not a direct military conflict occurs, Europe is already experiencing a new phase of insecurity. The task ahead is to transform fear into preparedness, anxiety into cooperation, and uncertainty into thoughtful, measured strategy, without losing the values and principles that define European society.

Dr. Nelson Kattikat

Anger

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

Interpersonal Effectiveness – Expressing Anger Safely.

When anger needs to be communicated without escalating conflict, the “DEAR MAN skill “helps you assert yourself clearly and calmly—without exploding.

DEAR MAN (Assert Without Aggression): –

D – Describe.the situation using facts only (avoid blame or judgment).

– E – Express. your feelings clearly (e.g., “I feel hurt”).

– A – Assert your needs or requests directly.

– R – Reinforce. by explaining the positive outcome (“This will help us…”).

– M – Mindful: stay focused on the issue; don’t get sidetracked.

– A – Appear confident: use a calm tone and steady body language.

– N – Negotiate. if necessary; be open to compromise.

– Keep the conversation within 20 minutes

Example: If a plan was changed without informing you, you could say: “When the plans were changed without telling me, I felt hurt and angry. I need to be informed in advance. That will help me feel more secure and respected.”

IMTM

I Mind The Mind Trust

Donot Betray yourself

whisperer2darknessLeave a comment

Donot betray your inner truth to stay safe
Elio had a homosexual relationship with Oliver. His father came to know about it. Being a father Mr. Pearlman is giving a beautiful advice to his son as follows:

ELIO looks at his father, then drops his eyes to the floor.

PERLMAN (CONT’D)
Look –
you had a beautiful friendship.
Maybe more than a friendship. And I
envy you. In my place, my parents
would hope the whole thing goes
away, to pray that their sons land
on their feet. But
I am not such a parent. In your
place, if there is pain, nurse it.
And if there is a flame, don’t
snuff it out. Don’t be brutal with
it. We rip out so much of ourselves
to be cured of things faster, that
we go bankrupt by the age of thirty
and have less to offer each time we
start with someone new. But to make
yourself feel nothing so as not to
feel anything – what a waste!

ELIO is dumbstruck as he tries to take all this in.

PERLMAN (CONT’D)
Have I spoken out of turn?

ELIO shakes his head.

PERLMAN (CONT’D)
Then let me say one more thing. It
will clear the air. I may have come
close, but I never had what you two
had. Something always held me back
or stood in the way. How you live
your life is your business.
Remember, our hearts and our bodies
are given to us only once. And
before you know it, your heart is
worn out, and, as for your body,
there comes a point when no one
looks at it, much
less wants to
come near it. Right now there’s
sorrow. Pain. Don’t kill it and
with it the joy you’ve felt.

PERLMAN takes a breath.

PERLMAN (CONT’D)
We may never speak about this
again. But I hope you’ll never hold
it against me that we did. I will
have been a terrible father if, one
day, you’d want to speak to me and
felt that the door was shut, or not
sufficiently open.

(From Call me by your name)