I LOVE how she’s smiling as she sings here. It’s Kathleen Hanna in Bikini Kill performing Suck My Left One. [possible trigger warning for the lyrics? NSFW without headphones?]
Daddy comes into my room at night. He’s got more than talking on his mind
My sister pulls the covers down. She reaches over and pulls on the light.. AND SHE SAYS TO HIM
Suck! My! Left! One!. SUCK! MY! LEFT! ONE!
Mama says:
You’ve got to be polite girls, you’ve got to be polite girls .
Show a little, respect for your father. Wait until your father gets home!
I was more circus dyke than riot girl, despite being into punk and feminism in the mid 90’s when riot grrl took off here. I prefer dance to guitar, so I mainly love riot grrrl for the use of zines and lyrics as CR [consciousness raising].
For example, this song’s lyrics might appall some feminists unfamiliar with the subculture they’re coming from. I mean, little girls defying their abuser dad to “suck” them?
Too me though it captures how riot grrrl’s so effective at transforming pop culture into politicized resistance. The really physical, emotionally immediate mediums of zines and punk songs are perfect for synthesizing feminist CR approaches against silencing & punk approaches to “making space” for self expression.
It may be true that many women, by the 90’s, had grown up “with feminism in the water”: a catchphrase I heard in too many privileged, divisive arguments about ageism in feminism. It was also true that the 2nd wave gains hadn’t reached everyone equally. Young women starting out by protesting rape in Australia, like the UK and USA in that period, experienced a feminism defined by;
–backlash against progressive politics,
-drives to discredit incest survivors by the False Memory Syndrome movement & MRA groups, and
– scorn within progressive communities, like punk and liberal feminism, that ANY sexual harrassement protest was just “victim feminism” now that 2nd wavers had successfully criminalized some forms of rape.
[Unfortunately, rapists hadn’t got that memo]
In other words, a piggy in the middle politicization of being scapegoated by progressives for the reduced feminist energy since the 2nd wave, and targetted by conservatives co-opting feminist concepts to put survivors back in “their place” [aka silent].
That atmosphere made the optimistic, mass movement based CR methods of the early 2nd wave inaccessible to newer feminists. Adapting CR to a pop culture format which was fun, easily transmitted and emphazised acceptance of amateurism was an inspired intervention in that dynamic.
An added bonus, imho, is that the visceral nature of punk allowed for challenging gender based expectations of behaviours, like screaming and being physically shocking or performative with the body. Punk shows can get pretty violent.
The sexually aggressive machismo of them vs. the very “safe space” emphasis of women’s organizing at the time felt like an re-affirmation of essentialist values: macho men dominate public space in rape culture, women only express “sensitive” things about our bodily experiences in heteronormativity, all is binary.
So, not to romanticize the violence, but I liked that girls & queers were encouraged to hold our ground in that aggressive environment while macho boys were asked to take more responsibility for safety at shows or be called on it. It’s remarkable to me when feminists remain nyah-nyah dismissive of riot grrrl just because the aesthetic was co-opted, as predicted, by Girl Power.*
That co-option only illustrates riot grrls’ political point; that girls and young women may need to make their own media and community, if they want to organize without without being victim blamed for the co-option of their voices by both:
– ageist, sexist gazes which support feminism in principle, but remain hostile to girls expressing their unsantized experiences of sexual politics beyond “caring and healing” sisterhood
– the consumer gazes which fetishize then appropriate DIY cultures reducing them to marketable aesthetics
Another excerpt from a doco on riot grrl: “People reacted to what we did very strongly”









