24
Aug
08

Grrrl style: speak for yourself

I LOVE how she’s smiling as she sings here. It’s Kathleen Hanna in Bikini Kill performing Suck My Left One. [possible trigger warning for the lyrics? NSFW without headphones?]

Daddy comes into my room at night. He’s got more than talking on his mind

My sister pulls the covers down. She reaches over and pulls on the light.. AND SHE SAYS TO HIM

Suck! My! Left! One!. SUCK! MY! LEFT! ONE!

Mama says:

You’ve got to be polite girls, you’ve got to be polite girls .

Show a little, respect for your father. Wait until your father gets home!

I was more circus dyke than riot girl, despite being into punk and feminism in the mid 90’s when riot grrl took off here. I prefer dance to guitar,  so I mainly love riot grrrl for the use of zines and lyrics as CR [consciousness raising].

For example, this song’s lyrics might appall some feminists unfamiliar with the subculture they’re  coming from. I mean, little girls defying their abuser dad to “suck” them?

Too me though it captures how riot grrrl’s so effective at transforming pop culture into politicized resistance.   The really physical, emotionally immediate mediums of zines and punk songs are perfect for synthesizing feminist CR approaches against silencing & punk approaches to “making space” for self expression.

It may be true that many women, by the 90’s, had grown up “with feminism in the water”: a catchphrase I heard in too many privileged, divisive arguments about ageism in feminism. It was also true that the 2nd wave gains hadn’t reached everyone equally. Young women starting out by protesting rape in Australia, like the UK and USA in that period, experienced a feminism defined by;

backlash against progressive politics,

-drives to discredit incest survivors by the False Memory Syndrome movement & MRA groups, and

– scorn within progressive communities, like punk and liberal feminism, that ANY sexual harrassement protest was just “victim feminism” now that 2nd wavers had successfully criminalized some forms of rape.

[Unfortunately, rapists hadn’t got that memo]

In other words, a piggy in the middle politicization of being scapegoated by progressives for the reduced feminist energy since the 2nd wave, and targetted by conservatives co-opting feminist concepts to put survivors back in “their place” [aka silent].

That atmosphere made the optimistic, mass movement based CR methods of the early 2nd wave inaccessible to newer feminists.  Adapting CR to a pop culture format which was fun, easily transmitted and emphazised acceptance of amateurism was an inspired intervention in that dynamic.

An added bonus, imho, is that the visceral nature of punk allowed for challenging gender based expectations of behaviours, like screaming and being physically shocking or performative with the body. Punk shows can get pretty violent.

The sexually aggressive machismo of them vs. the very “safe space” emphasis of women’s organizing at the time felt like an re-affirmation of essentialist values: macho men dominate public space in rape culture, women only express “sensitive” things about our bodily experiences in heteronormativity, all is binary.

So, not to romanticize the violence, but I liked that girls & queers were encouraged to hold our ground in that aggressive environment while macho boys were asked to take more responsibility for safety at shows or be called on it. It’s remarkable to me when feminists remain nyah-nyah dismissive of riot grrrl just because the aesthetic was co-opted, as predicted, by Girl Power.*

That co-option only illustrates riot grrls’ political point; that girls and young women may need to make their own media and community, if they want to organize without without being victim blamed for the co-option of their voices by both:

– ageist, sexist gazes which support feminism in principle, but remain hostile to girls expressing their unsantized experiences of sexual politics beyond “caring and healing” sisterhood

– the consumer gazes which fetishize then appropriate DIY cultures reducing them to marketable aesthetics

Another excerpt from a doco on riot grrl: “People reacted to what we did very strongly”

*Not to be conflated with the 3rd wave btw.  Riot grrrls and DIY feminists get falsely credited in media with the 3rd wave, which was named by Rebecca Walker and addressed inter-sectional politics beyond the white middle class or essentialist feminist constructions of “Woman” emerging in academic feminism.  They weren’t mutually exclusive, but 3rd wave influences like Patricia Hill Collins & Audre Lorde considered race, class and sexuality more than ageism.
03
Jun
08

Spinster Flicks: Mr Darcy I presume?

On my birthday just passed, 3 people asked me if I regretted not having kids. The answer is no, and happily no kids regret not having me for a parent either, although various baby dykes have adopted me.

This inspired a barren!spinster film marathon: Bridget Jones I and II, Pride and Prejudice and Grey Gardens. One for me, three for Julia Gillard. I knew these were good choices when a few moments into Bridget Jones, she’d already dedicated a page to me in her diary, like so: “AM INSANE SPINSTER!!!”

Cultural insights gleaned from the Always A Maddona/Whore Dichotomy – Never A Bride pop fest;

– we haven’t really come a long way, baby.

– If your romantic hopes reside within a social landscape of globalisation, middle class mores and hetero-patriarchy, you may as well grab any smouldering male leads that come your way.

– empire line dresses are MUCH more alluring than cheap office wear.

The Garden Party Re-Enactment

Female Chauvanist Pigs, the garden party re-enactment

Bridget Jones re-iterated my sense of not getting some parts of the pop pulse. They were funny yes, but even as parody I felt Rene overplayed the “really naive for a 30 something woman” card a bit much to suspend disbelief. Worth it mainly for the pop culture in-jokes.

The Male Gaze? What about the male gays?

Grey Gardens, which I expected to be most pro-spinster was oddly least, for reasons outside the actual film. *SPOILER TIME*.

Many people who recommended this to me as a spinster film or even a gay film, none mention that Edies’ story is largely about mental illness related downward mobility. I’d probably have enjoyed it as a character study of a woman retaining her chutzpah through loss, if I hadn’t been thinking about why people avoided mentioning the major issue.

That oversight about the obvious distress behind her eccentric lifestyle fits the general media trend of using privileged white women to sexualize, depoliticize or glamorize mental illness; from “Girl Interrupted” sexing up institutionalization, to  sacchrine Nuerotic White Women portrayals overshadowing actual Mad Rights analysis in pharma sponsored disability media.

The casual sexism of people treating this film as a warning about the cost of spinsterhood, not schizophrenia, jarred me in a way that the good natured humor of Bridget Jones’ spinster panic never would.

Lizzie & Janes’ eco-feminist co-op

Pride and Prejudice was the most satisfying of the bunch, helped greatly by the aesthetics. It’s social commentary on middle class gender dynamics contemporizes really well.

Which surprised me a little: I’d never gotten into the books and was expecting a standard romance. The BBC version made it much easier to appreciate Austen’s narrative skills in context; the coded behaviors for navigating class and gender boundaries.

I’m also surprised that cultural critics took the revival of Austen’s’ romances (and BJ’s diary) as an indication that feminism and post-colonialism have failed;the argument that fans are romanticising a lack of rights. Isn’t that more Caitlin Flannigans audience?

Especially I appreciated that the BBC version retains the ensemble form. Allowing several types of relationships to be juxtaposed highlights the unifying theme of “romantic” aspirations being balanced against economic & social capital demands. Bridget Jones, by reducing her peers to competition or plot devices, loses this caution-by-comparison against wholly naïve or cynical approaches to romance.

+ Austen was a spinster btw.

+ Now I think about it, if I was straight I’d probably be seen as a divorcee not a spinster.

27
Apr
08

patriotism is the last resort of the scoundrel

ANZAC day makes me jumpy.

Not the services per se, I’m not actually that cliche of the Reactionary Lefty who’d dismiss anyone wanting a ceremony to acknowledge such significant events.

It’s more the implications of making a military event such a focus of national identity. Which leads to some peoples’ suffering being censored, or presented as less than others, if they don’t fit the nationalist myth, or worse exposed political abuses from “our side”. Honestly, they’re describing the slaughter of the Anzac’s as “sacred” on the radio while still covering up military rape, abuse of war refugees and PTSD veterans. Gross.

Especially when nationalist spin on war appropriates private griefs. When it takes events that caused oceans of private losses; personal, complex and potentially empathetic losses, just to regurgitate them as bullshit “For us or against us” propoganda. Isn’t one of the aims of “Lest We Forget” to remember NOT to fall for those values and repeat history again?

I try to not register ANZAC day, or get upset about the consequences for relatives who served in wars, but were never flag wavers, and were called traitors to country or family for simply naming their trauma. I know it’s not a wise time to mention others who were subject to military abuse as civilians during and after wars, to which they can rarely testify without their words being turned against them to blame them for all the sufferings of “our troops” . Blamed more than the actual politicians who sacrificed those troops, more than civilians who frame these groups as divide and conquer good/bad from their detached observer distance.

But when is the OK time to be able to express all that? That time which is already everyday, because actually these groups aren’t necessarily living in total isolation or enimity from each other: often, they’re same person. But media, especially once it decides the theme of the day is nationalism, likes to have clear markers of who is a hero and who is scapegoat.

It takes generations for these layered, conflicting traumas to resolved: then by the next generation there’s always another war. Art is catharsis, or at least better than the hype on TV.

“Pieta” Kathe Kollowitz .

The enormous misery, deprivation, and sacrifice suffered during World War II were at no time reduced to soldiers at the front. The National Socialist regime followed a propaganda policy of celebrating the deaths of soldiers as heroic deeds; individual sorrow was considered undesirable.

Her sculpture is a compassionate expression of the pain of mothers and wives during the war. The future has no place here. Kollowitz, a German, was denounced by the Nazi’s for her art.

“In the Third Reich, mothers have no need to defend their children. The State does that.”

Beyond Duc My – Terry Eichler

After being forced to go to war they were then obliged to serve as scapegoats for the national bad conscience. This is the role that should have been filled by complicit politicians and their military advisors. Thanks for nothing..Australia.

Painting by Australian vet Terry Eichler, who only 25 years after being conscripted to the Viet/USA/AU war, feels able to paint a picture of his medals pinned into his flesh, reflecting his feelings of betrayal by the Australian government, media and public.

Vietnam: A journal/journal by Mimi Nguyen

I am unprepared, however, when he says, angrily, “You know, a lot of men died fighting for your country.”

For a split-second I am too stunned to say a word. I am caught in that contraction of muscles and tendons, suspended. Flinching.

Slowly. “So what, you want me to be grateful? Does that mean I’m supposed to fuck everyone who survived?”

I am trying to establish, the contradictory conditions under which I have had to come to terms with history and politics, since you won’t.

whole article at worse than queer

Pastiche of reflections by Nguyen, on the mytholigising of “Vietnam” years after her childhood refugee migration to the USA. Personal, pop, political and theory.

My sister Jill – Patricia Cornelius

When I was four, I knew we were shit. …My mum knew we were shit too.

She says we’re full of it. ..The way we bow down to authority. How we tug our forelocks to the Queen, do whatever Amercia wants us to do. Someone’s always better.

Brilliant novel, a much better written lesbian feminist working class alternative to the standard school texts featuring wars impact on families: “My Brother Jack ” and “The One Day of the Year”. So of course, no one has heard of it.

Addresses conflict in an Anglo Australian family over the Viet Nam war draft. WW2 veteran Dad dominates the family with his alcoholic rages. They all keep silent about this racist, macho abuse in deference to [or helplessness about] his PTSD afflicted veteran status. Tensions erupt when one of the families’ twin sons is drafted, leaving the other behind unemployed on being declared “unfit”, prompting elder daughter Jill to exorcise her hatred of this dismal cycle through militant feminist draft protest activism. 

All narrated from the perspective of the youngest daughter Christine, a child gradually going literally insane from the pressure to take impossible sides in her family. Sounds depressing but actually isn’t. It compassionately examines inter-generational trauma, and the connections between being violated and becoming a violator.

Ok, end of emo. Please now return to the national sport of piss-taking.

21
Dec
07

You live for the fight, when it’s all that you’ve got.

It was world AIDS day a fortnight ago. Caught up with the old guys, blathered much, tippled much, post now.

The picture’s Reconfiguring the Constellations in the Night Sky of My Youth by Ray Cooke. His themes are often about shifts in gay representation and subcultures.

It’s from my favorite series where his friends pose as red dotted clowns: the transition in mainstream perceptions of gay men from AIDS stigma pariahs to some kind of cultural accessories in about a decade.

Having come out just as HIV/AIDS backlash peaked and galvinised us, I relate to a fair bit of that period’s identity politics, without being into identity politics usually. Sometimes I meet queers anxious to distance themselves from that era – especially the interest in labels – because they find it reductionist and limiting. I understand that coming from people without any personal connection to queer activism as survival.

Dyke cartoonist Alison Bechdel said the aim of any civil rights movement is to make itself redundant. Which queer activism isn’t yet, but less of a pressing emphasis on death and label bickering is sure nice.

It’s weird to have a community whose core actors are a minority making major historical leaps in tiny time frames though. I was conscious of that on AIDS day. Early on I was with people whose lives remain largely defined by HIV/AIDS. Had a relaxed afternoon with people glad to both still be here and to remember those who aren’t.

Then I went by a bigger event, didn’t want to go in because I don’t like crowds, it seemed really well put on though, the face of AIDS activism now, all public education in red.

A mutual acquaintance introduced me to some of his friends who regarded it as a civic duty backdrop to the party later. They grew up after HIV/AIDS was visible issue on the scene and weren’t really interested. So I was shocked when we were at the bar and they made these comments about our friends’ “hunchback” look – a visible side effect from his medication. Then I realised that they didn’t mean to be rude, they really hadn’t hadn’t thought that these physical changes he’s experiencing were related to HIV. They’d assumed that having HIV was something that happened to other people’s peers not theirs, even as they said they were “over” AIDS day type queer events.

Sometimes I catch myself code switching a lot between conversations at mainly queer parties to try and bridge the gaps with diplomacy over these real differences in views across social niches . I really feel revived by some queer get togethers, but other times I feel like my gimp related adventures in miscommunication + the rainbow social fishbowl = even simple interactions take a lot of work.

Cooke consciously approaches art as a public conversation with yourself about these kinds of social dynamics – bringing creativity to shifts in ties and gazes that otherwise could get internalized and reduce you to the stereotypes you’re targeted with. “Define yourself or someone else will do it for you”- Audre Lorde.

To me his pictures convey that era well: sex, death, surprise combinations, circus, gay blokes, physicality. Tragedy or comedy? Like a family photo album- if your family were tenuously connected characters in an odd space in time.

17
Nov
07

National Day Of Action – NT Intervention

Today’s the National Day of Action in Solidarity against the NT Intervention. [Ok I’m online late, but it’s being a pre-election busy weekend and it’s still Saturday somewhere in the world!]

There’s so much to address here, I’ll make a change from the news and views posts to focus on one aspect of the post Little Children Are Sacred Report debate, the relevance of the C-word.

I’d been spending lots of time in services for People With Disabilities in the period when the NT response was announced and the blame passing really let loose. Those groups had high rates of white, mainly professional, abled people in them.  I was really struck by the contrast in how service access for health needs was being discussed publically for Aboriginal people vs. all other Australians.

Coming from the same state which offered financial election sweeteners for women like me having more babies and disability recognition – the public turnabout on treating Aboriginal health rights as optional is frightening. What verges on surreal is the vigorous opposition to naming colinization and racism in this rights gap [relics of the past, forget them] even as those values flaunted in responses to The Response daily.

For a colony, we’ve got pretty low public articulacy around what colonization is and how it relates to contemporary inequalities. At least two parties on the Federal election ballot paper have leaders who don’t understand that declaring yourself to be a “regular Australian”, as a white Anglo person promoting xenophobia, is a statement about colinization and nation, not an ethnic description and expression of general goodwill.

If the NT measures and their authoritarian tangent is news to you please check the National Aboriginal Alliance site for the 101 or the rest of this post mightn’t make sense.

SO: a little exercise recording colonial impacts on health and social services entitlement, taking my cue from Peggy Mackintosh’s “Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” . That exercise aimed to make white privilege visible by giving examples of common experiences where the impact of white supremacy and race constructs in daily life are often  taken for granted by people deemed white. The line “I can be sure that if I need legal or medical help, my race will not work against me.” leapt out as relevant here.

So here’s a list in knapsack format of things I witnessed which reflected colonial values in some way, since June. Some are transparently public events, some things I’ve witnessed in health services personally, but none remain in some totally distant ‘get over it’ past.

I can be sure as a white PWD accessing health and social services that:

1. I will never be denied treatment at a hospital that was built with the unpaid labour of me or my elders. (1)

2. I will never be subject to sneering accusations of ‘special treatment’ or ‘reverse racist handouts’ should I utilise public health services that all citizens of my nation are entitled too access.

3. I will never have my testimony about the impact of sexual assault crimes on my current health appropriated to make a national spectacle of slandering my entire culture.

4. I will never have my testimonies about sexual and child abuse used to justify members of the military entering the communities of people identified of my ‘race’, without my consent or consultation.

5. I will not have a range of self identified progressives who gate keep my access to health and child welfare services claim me as their personal ‘token friend’ in public debates – in exchange for nothing or access to services that they are already paid to deliver to all their clients.

6. My views will not be overridden in favour of people of other cultural identities and complexions to mine speaking as ‘experts’ on my safety needs in influential forums- and being treated as ‘experts’ even if I have better qualifications and experience.

7. When health workers who fail to met professional standards in my treating me confide privately that they are hindered by long term under resourcing of their services and infrastructure for my community – I will not be subject to some of those same workers publicly claiming that the problem is caused by people of my ‘race’ being ‘too difficult’ to deliver services to.

8. I never hear staff in organizations dedicated to child protection and public health express outrage at the term ‘racist’ being used to describe the fact of their ongoing neglect of clients of my ‘race’ influences who dies early of preventable diseases in this wealthy nation.

8 (a). No one says that it proves how ‘angry’ Women of my Race are when I observe aloud that defensiveness about a word – racism – can attract more attention than the ongoing reduced life expectancy of an entire demographic harmed by it’s perpetration.

9. If I’m scapegoated as a ‘bad’ patient for problems in the public health system – I take some reassurance in the range of disability, family, feminist and health ‘consumer’ groups promoting messages supporting the rights of people like me. I never worry that they won’t support me out of fear that their own ignorance about racism may be exposed.

10. I am never accused of child abuse simply because the doctor is ignorant of something about my demographic – such as mistaking birth mark patterns not common in white children as abuse bruises on my child. (2)

11. If I report child abuse, and seek assistance from police, health and child welfare agencies to address this – I will not be told that I can’t have it ‘both ways’ after people of my identity stood up to abuse and child abduction by members of these same agencies. (3)

12. I have never been told that receipt of state health assistance is conditional on denying my rights under international human rights laws– including property rights, freedom from racial discrimination and access to state distributed parent support services.

Some of these are too specific to really work the knapsack approach.  Plus I’ve used the term race although many POC use other terms-because the response relies on dodging the Racial Discrimination Act. The aim here is just to illustrate by repetition what should already be obvious. .

The National Aborigonal Alliance and Women For Wik have actions and things you can do, within Australia and out.

(1) Refers to both the Stolen Wages era and present day. I’ve met many Queensland Aboriginal people who grew up building public institutions –including health institutions and hospitals –without being paid. Since then, to the present, they’ve been turned away from hospital emergency sections when their distress at medical pain was dismissed as evidence that they were ‘drunk blacks’.

(2) This was done to a friend recently, and is also given as an example of grounds for child removal in the Bringing Them Home report

(3) See also the Bringing them Home report and about ongoing concerns about role of child separation by welfare and juvenile justice systems today.

16
Nov
07

International Day of Action on the NT Intervention -November 17th

In June this year, the Australian Prime Minister, John Howard announced the ‘National Emergency Response’ to combat child abuse in Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory, in response to Little Children Are Sacred report. 

The measures announced don’t actually support the recommendations of that report. Instead, they include:

  • the quarantining of half of all welfare payments
  • the abolition of the Community Development Employment Program
  • the appointment of managers for 73 prescribed communities, compulsory sexual health examinations of children,
  • and the abolition of the permit system, which affords rights to control what strangers many enter their property, amongst other things.

The Emergency Response employs draconian measures and violates human rights. Passage of the legislation is  dependent on the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 and the Northern Territory Native Title Act . Federal police and the military have been sent into the NT to enforce these measures.

Assets grab
The extraordinary measures give the Federal Government power to seize lands and property without compensation, the owners of those lands and properties have no right of appeal. Removal of basic property rights enjoyed by all other Australians, with the abolition of the permit system, is a gross violation of human rights. Even the Northern Territory police oppose this measure, for the likely adverse effect it will have on crime.

$570 million is being spent on these measures, half of that spent on the salaries of 700 new bureaucratic positions created to regulate this intervention. $88 million will be spent on measures to control the incomes of Aboriginal people on any government payment (including aged pensions and veterans payments).

This is an insult to the hard work of Aboriginal people campaigning for desperately needed basic services in remote communities: roads, schools, health care, housing and social services. Meanwhile Howard’s government refuses to fund the the Close the Gap campaign, following a report by Oxfam earlier this year, showing that Indigenous life expectancy is 17 years below that of non-Indigenous life expectancy.

Rewind Protection
The Federal Government has appointed non-Indigenous business managers to the ‘prescribed’ communities. These managers have the power to decide who lives in a community and who must leave; they can observe any meeting of an organisation working at the community, they can change any local programme. Many Aboriginal communities consider these measures as an invasion.

They’re a disturbing echo of the intrusive control of Aboriginal peoples’ lives by managers on mission stations, and under the former Aboriginal Protection Acts.

Demand change
This weekend, on 17th and 18th November, groups across Australia are taking action to show opposition to the Federal government’s NT intervention, and support for the strong self-determination that Indigenous people demonstrate every day.

It’s vitally important that information about the intervention and views of Indigenous people in the Northern Territory are widely disseminated through social justice networks. Please use your community and activist media to promote the interests of Indigenous Australians, and Indigenous people worldwide!

Show Solidarity

In Australia THIS WEEKEND show your support at rallies, concerts and marches in Sydney, Brisbane, Darwin, Adelaide, Lismore, Alice Springs, Newcastle and Melbourne. Check Women for Wik for locations and join in!

You can also spread the news of to as many people as possible in this week coming up the Federal Elections: write an article about it, blog about it, email the news to your friends and encourage them to speak out.

Learn more:
National Aboriginal Alliance

Women for Wik.
ANTaR [Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation]
Oxfam Australia
Koori Mail

Blogging the Intervention

Firefly at She Who Stumbles

Intercontinental Cry

Women of Colour Blog

Hoyden about Town

The Greens

Democrats

ENIAR

11
Nov
07

poppies

“I wonder if Howard would give me a state funeral if he knew what I really stood for”.

Alec Campbell, union man, Vietnam War protestor and the last Anzac, quoted in Workers Online, May 2002.

Image:Too Many Martyrs In Paradise by Alissar Gazal

14
Oct
07

fighting words

From onestarpress via Printfetish blog

Empowerment cannot be translated as Entitlement -by conceptual artist Lawrence Weiner. So conceptual, I’m not sure how it’s meant. But I like the slogan + pretty books.

I just was told that Susan Faludi has a new book out – The Terror Dream – Fear and Fantasy in Post 9/11 America

Susan Faludi shines a light on the country’s psychological response to the attacks on that terrible day. … Why, she asks, did an assault on American global dominance provoke an almost hysterical summons to restore “traditional” manhood, marriage, and maternity? Why did our media react as if the hijackers had targeted not a commercial and military edifice but the family home and nursery? read chapter excerpt

As much as Howard talking up reconcilliation from the interest point of a very reluctant Anglo-Nationalist inspired all kinds of justifiable cynicism [and some positive actions ] public intellectuals like Ghassan Hage and various feminists have demonstrated that examinations of national psyches & myth making are useful in resisting the prejudices often underlying panicked, white nationalist reactions to both real and percieved threats.

An upshot of the intense nationalism since S-11 [or Howard’s wedge politics] seems to be at that at least such political examinations of national psyche are entering more mainstream debate. I’m excited about this one because it’s time for it and I hope she’ll have a smart take on synthesizing the issues.

04
Oct
07

radical community responses s*xual assault

It’s still September, but I thought I’d pass on this invite from a queer list,  for people to check their website and plan actions for November.

I’ve usually done things about providing feminist support in feminist groups, or by myself as the lone feminist in some totally-not-sexual-politics-friendly group. This has me thinking about focussing on ally work for a bit of a change.

INTERNATIONAL DAY OF ACTION
For Radical Community Responses to Sexual Assault -November 30th 2007

We are calling for people to organise in their own towns and cities to take action on this day. This means whatever it means to you – maybe organising in your school, occupying an office or a court or a police station, holding a rally, making a publication, talking to people, or anything you can think of.

The Australian government has used sexual assault to justify the military invasion, removal of land permits, and denial of Indigenous autonomy in the Northern Territory. But this is not a way of dealing with sexual assault – fear, intimidation, and military and police presence as a “solution” shows no understanding of sexual assault or ways of dealing with it. …

… Our government shows no interest in trying to engage with the real issues of sexual assault and how to confront it, so we need to do it ourselves. …

For more information, or to add your own:communitiesresponsetosexualassault.wordpress.com


12
Aug
07

For whose own good?

Damn, when will the moral panic slash racism in Indigenous affairs stop? The Liberals last week rushed in the Commonwealth Emergency Response Bill.

This Bill;

– grabs land rights back to the Federal government

– relies on exclusion from the Racial Discrimination Act

– lacked consultation with Indigenous communities

– increased police powers beyond recommendations of child safety reports

Campaign and petition over at Get!Up to register objection.

Gina Smith

“We’re a group of Central Australian delegates that represent our constituents back home in the Central Area. We just wanted to say that we welcome the child abuse report and intervention of child abuse, but we don’t want our permit system removed because it means so much to our protection of our lands and sacred sites and knowing who can and can’t go there.

Comment of John Daily, chairman of the Northern Land Council on changes to the Land Rights Act passed in 1976;

“The Land Rights Act has been our great strength …We question the right of a government at the end of this parliament to trifle carelessly with this iconic legislation when you have never campaigned on the matter or had a serious dialogue about it.”

c/ SBS Living Black news

 

The appropriation of moral outrage at child abuse to override those same communities rights would have people believe that child rights to freedom from sexual abuse and racist paternalism are mutally exclusive, a zero sum game. What a lie, it’s a defeatist view that only serves those choosing not to “get” the alternate solutions.

Comment from ANTaR media release from director Gary Highland;

Mr Highland said that while there was no doubting Minister Brough’s sincerity, his approach of riding roughshod over Indigenous communities was severely flawed.

“Releasing such lengthy and complex legislation only the day before it was to be voted on is the action of a government that has become arrogant, unaccountable and out of touch,” Mr Highland said.

Pat Turner, a chairwoman of the Child Sex Abuse Inquiry, also rejected the ‘protection’ power grab approach in last weeks’ Lateline programme saying;

“I would appeal to the Prime Minister to stop. Please stop, don’t proceed. Just stop so he can talk to more Aboriginal people, to talk to Aboriginal leaders.”

And a final word on hi-jacking legitimate concerns about child safety to enforce land grabs, from the ABC news;

The authors of the ‘Little Children are Sacred’ report, which sparked the crackdown, were not asked to give formal evidence.

During a break they told Labor, Democrat and Greens senators that there is no connection between land tenure and abuse.

But Sue Gordon, who is heading the intervention task force, urged the Senate to pass the bills without delay.

“We really have to start putting children first,” she said.





Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started