Victoria Donovan first visited the Donbas area in Eastern Ukraine in 2019, and found herself going back there time and again. Originally from Cardiff, she felt some affinity to the landscape in the coal producing regions, with their conical slag heaps, known as terrykony. She was also fascinated to discover that a Welshman called Hughes set up a coal and pig-iron extraction business in Donbas in the 19th century, one of many West European entrepreneurs at the time. As Professor of Ukrainian and East European Studies at the University of St. Andrews, she became involved in several collaborative projects with colleagues in Ukraine. But it was the anger and distress she felt at the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2024 that prompted the writing of this book: not the academic work she first had in mind, but a more collaborative book written in consultation with the many Ukrainians who knew the Donbas and its history like the back of their hands.

The book is organised thematically, in chapters with titles like Mineral Worlds, Colonial Entanglements, Cults, Bright City, though there are overlaps. Each chapter is prefaced with a text written by a Ukrainian colleague and in Mineral Worlds it’s Mykhailo Kulishov, Misha, a researcher and caver, who guides her on a visit to the gypsum mine south of Bakhmut with all its intricate subterranean passages and strange sculptural formations. She visits with him the salt mines at Artemsil’ and the coal mine at Toresk. We learn that there were three kinds of coal produced in the Donbas, coking, lean and anthracite, of a quality rarely encountered in Europe. Her writing is not only clear and precise here on the geology—I’ve never read such an accessible account of the origins of coal—but she also conveys a sense of both the grandeur and uniqueness of the landscape. Seeing the salt swamps outside Kostiantynivka, it looks as though a makeshift ice rink has been laid in the middle of a sun-scorched steppe.
In Colonial Entanglements the writer goes deeper into the history of Donbas, which she characterises as one of colonisation. Given the wealth of natural resources described in the first chapter it’s not surprising that this region, in the centre of Europe, should be coveted by many. Before industrialisation it was known as Wild Field, which suggests an empty, unpopulated steppe. In fact, there were plenty of people living there, Tatars, Nogais and Cossacks. When Catherine the Great wrested back the area from the Turks, she encouraged Europeans to settle there—German Mennonites, French, Dutch and English—rather than Russians, because they had more sophisticated farming skills. For all that she called it Novorossia, New Russia, its population was hardly Russian, belying the myth that these lands always belonged to Russia.
Colonisation continued through the 19th century when foreign capital arrived in the Donbas, lured by cheap labour on the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, and the ease of transportation with the development of the railway network. This continued until 1917, and the Russian revolution, when foreign capital was thrown out and industries nationalised. The Soviets renamed the plants and developed the myth that Joseph Stalin was the person who industrialised this area. Victoria Donovan comes across historians, archivists and journalists who want to tell people this earlier history, traces of which she sees in Bakhmut, a centre of Ukrainian trade and industry in the 18th and 19th century with its wide boulevard-like streets….lined with grand red-brick buildings, built in the neoclassical and Baroque style. Of course, she adds, since the recent Russian occupation and full-scale invasion in February 2024, attempts to look at 19th century history have again been suppressed.
One of the pleasures of this book is the writer’s keen visual eye. It’s not just the natural landscape that she portrays so vividly, but also the man-made spaces and their significance through time and political change. In 2019 she visits Sievrodonetsk in the Luhansk region, where she’s invited to a rave in a hangar, formerly part of the AZOT chemical plant. Sievrodonetsk was one of Ukraine’s best preserved monotowns, a City of Chemists, well known in Soviet times from Riga to Vladivostok, and the AZOT plant, built to produce ammonium nitrate for Soviet fertilizer. She’s shown round the city’s iconic buildings, like the Palace of Chemists, with its green and white colonnaded façade, where civic and cultural events are held, (a little like Berlin’s Palast der Republik?). Then there’s the huge Palace of Sports, an arena that held up to 7,000 people, the biggest stadium of its kind, barring Novosibirsk and Riga, when it was built in 1975. The writer notes the colourful murals that wrap round the building showing idealised scenes from Soviet sporting and cultural life. She not only describes them, but we can see them too, in one of several stunning colour photos at the centre of the book—many other black and white photos illustrate the text throughout.
One of the downsides of Sievrodonetsk was the pollution: fine dust and nitric-acid emissions from the chemical plant was linked to heart and pulmonary disease. Pollution from industry was even more of a theme in Mariupol. WhenVictoria Donovan visits in the winter of 2021 she’s hit by the pungent stench of metal-making…….. a smell which rolled regularly through the city like a noxious blanket being spread over a bed. The smell came from the two metallurgy complexes, the Azovstal and Ilych, owned by the Ukrainian oligarch Rinat Akhmetov, who had failed to install filtering technology in either plant. The writer points out that only after the Chornobyl disaster in 1986 was it possible to talk about environmental damage. From then, there was a growing activist scene protesting about the levels of air pollution in Mariupol, including protests in Theatre Square in 2018, the very square where in 2022 people wrote DETI—children—in huge letters on the pavement, in the hope that Russian bombers would spare the theatre. In vain. They bombed the theatre, killing 600 people, including children. The city of Mariupol and the Azovstal works were also largely destroyed.
Though she doesn’t return to the Donbas after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the writer does go to Lviv in western Ukraine in April 2023. She’s attending a workshop on public history there, and spends time with museum directors Zhenia and Olha. She learns of the complicated museum funding in Ukraine, and is aware that many museum directors from the East brought their collections to safety in the west with little support or guidance. But this is just typical of the initiative shown by many Ukrainians. The writer’s film-maker friend Sashko is now unloading transit vans bringing donations from Western Europe, an example of volunteer networks supplanting the state. And an example of the stoicism, resilience and just-getting-on-with-it spirit we’ve seen from the Ukrainian people. Life in Spite of Everything.
I hugely enjoyed this book. It had real personal resonance for me, having read Natascha Wodin’ s memoir of her mother, Sie kam aus Mariupol—I so enjoyed the description of that shallow Sea of Azov she may have bathed in as a girl. But I also feel I have now a deeper understanding of the Donbas, its history, its geology and the richness of its natural resources. Let us hope peace can come soon to this battered and beleaguered region.







