Holiday, Housing, and GDP Week

Going into the long weekend, I’ve been chewing on what may be the most important investment question we ever face, and it has nothing to do with stocks. It’s the question of where we put our remaining attention, energy, and clarity as the calendar insists on moving forward. There’s a “retirement” story most people tell themselves, but there’s also a quieter reality: aging isn’t just years, it’s motion. Some folks keep moving, building, learning, and adapting. Others default to the couch and the Cyclops. The difference shows up fast.

Markets are closed Monday, but the world is not. We’re heading into a week where headlines can matter more than models, and where the next slice of GDP data will give us a fresh read on whether money is actually turning over or just pooling in place. I’ll keep today’s column light on the “spoilers,” but the setup is straightforward: news flow is likely to drive, and the week ahead looks like one of those moments where timing, sentiment, and the consumer’s willingness to spend may tell us more than any single number. ChartPack is posted for subscribers. Use the holiday to get organized, pick a project, and come back Tuesday ready to think clearly.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

The “Dutchy” Faces Civil War Lite (CWL)

America hasn’t become the Duchy of Grand Fenwick overnight. We’re not there yet, and we probably can’t get there for another five or ten years. But the uncomfortable truth is that American hegemony, both financial and cultural, is now openly negotiable. Silver topped $90 overnight.

A reserve currency doesn’t lose leadership because another nation makes a speech. It loses leadership because the old anchor stops doing three jobs at once: settling trade, warehousing savings, and financing wars without blowing credibility to pieces. The shift shows up first in the plumbing — what gets invoiced in what, what central banks hoard, what is treated as “risk-free,” and which rails get used when things get tense.

That’s why the WWII handoff from sterling to the dollar matters. Britain entered the 1900s with empire trade networks and London finance as the global default. Then two world wars did the damage: gold drained, assets sold, debts piled up. Meanwhile the U.S. became the arsenal, the lender, and the factory floor. By war’s end, America held disproportionate gold, ran the most productive industrial base on Earth, and had the deep markets required for reserve currency status. Bretton Woods didn’t create dominance; it formalized a shift already forced by war math.

Now the “quiet tells” are back in view. In On the Waterfront: Change Noted, you’re not chasing headlines — you’re looking at slow-speed giants: port cargo numbers and the suggestion of meaningful declines up and down the West Coast, framed as a systems shift more than a cyclical wobble.

In the ChartPack, the frame is a “Global Gap or Dollar Faller?” moment: readers shifting from stock-picking to asset-class questions, and metals still on their “moonward journey.”

Those aren’t proof of an imminent collapse. They’re evidence of a world beginning to price alternatives and reduce single-point dependence.

Which is where the practical side comes in. Your CWL doctrine isn’t politics; it’s continuity-of-life: remain solvent, healthy, mobile, and optional while systems misalign. Treat CWL as a systems failure mode, with the objective being non-participation by default.

That same operational mindset applies to currency transitions: they don’t announce themselves with sirens. They arrive as reliability breaks, optionality narrows, and the default stops being the cheapest choice.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Minnesota Showtime and CWL

A few thoughts this morning extending the research from Friday on the odds of a Civil War Lite (CWL) riff from the Minnesota outrage this week.

As usual, we keep the “systems hat” on. But even for the public, the simple taekout from Friday was “As long as stocks are going up, Walz and company are a midway-style distraction.”  Maybe so.

It’s when the markets take a hike – the administrative coherence becomes a question – that’s when…well, more on that as we dive into the shallow end.

Because the ChartPack is the real deep end…

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

The Digital Anasazi

Subtitle: How a Mouse Wheel glitch on a brand new mouse – plus the insult of having to “get a confirmation code” to take delivery of food we’d already paid for – combine to present a distasteful and inescapable conclusion.

We are becoming the digital-spin off the Anasazi.  Which, you (ought to) remember as one of Joseph Tainter’s sociological studies underlining a critical concept.  “When the marginal rate of return on additional effort falls below zero, civilizations simply walk away.”

We aren’t there – yet. But Peoplenomics readers are checking their shoes.

Two incidents this week drive: A brand new mouse that failed to work as expected because its onboard “scrolling inertia” was out of control.  Add to this having to “get a code” in order to take delivery of an order – even after my bank account had been charged.

These may seem small – even petty of me – when you’ve been mapping the interactions between domains for as long as I have, these events run up caution flags all over the place.

Right now, America is in the “extending empire” to keep focus off the home front. Off Epstein, off China surpassing us, off rising taxes, especially when inflation is counted in, as a fraction of income. Inflation, to be clear, is a tax.  It’s the “compounding gorilla” that has stolen 97 percent of the Dollar’s purchasing power since 1913.

Unique?  Naw. We are not the first to try this gambit when the marginal returns started to suck wind and enter free-fall.

Rome did it repeatedly when returns at home thinned: campaigns in Gaul, Britannia, and later Dacia were sold as glory, security, and prosperity, but functioned just as much as pressure valves — ways to redirect attention, extract new resources, and delay reform. Expansion didn’t fix Rome’s internal inefficiencies. It postponed them, while adding new administrative and military overhead that further lowered returns for the average citizen.

Rome didn’t have a Fed tool to use.  There was a class of chiselers who scraped silver off the edges of coins.  A practice that led to serrated edges of “modern coin.”  Instead, we took most of the copper out of pennies, the silver from dimes, and who knows what from Fort Knox.

The pattern repeats. Imperial Spain chased silver across the Atlantic as domestic productivity stalled. Victorian Britain extended itself across Africa and Asia long after the industrial returns that built the empire had peaked. More recently, the Soviet Union leaned into foreign adventures as its internal economic model decayed — Afghanistan being less a cause of collapse than a symptom of declining marginal returns at home. In every case, outward motion substituted for inward repair.

Empires don’t expand because they are strong. They expand because the internal payoff curve has turned negative and leadership lacks the political bandwidth to say so. Jeffrey who?

Extending the perimeter buys time, narrative control, and distraction — but it never restores efficiency. That’s the Anasazi lesson applied at scale: when systems demand more effort for less reward, rational actors — individuals or civilizations — don’t fight the math forever. They route around it. Quietly. Until one day, the center realizes too late that the margins have already moved on.

Still,  this is just another day under Caesar Trump. And in the ChartPack you’ll see how Weimar 2.0 is alive, well, and beckoning people who could be putting in survival gardens like the new tech version we outlined last week.

Click like you life depends on it.  Because it very well could.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

The Guns of January

Most people consume news the way they consume caffeine: a quick jolt, a shallow reaction, and then they move on. Peoplenomics is built for people who want something different — a way to understand why events cluster, when risk shifts, and how long cycles quietly shape markets, politics, and even war.

This week’s Peoplenomics report connects developments most commentators treat as unrelated: U.S. gun-law rulings, rising global conflict zones, and late-cycle market behavior. Instead of reacting to headlines, we show how these events fit into a deeper pattern — where institutional trust thins, responsibility decentralizes, and volatility becomes structural rather than temporary. When courts, markets, and battle lines all start moving at once, it’s not coincidence. It’s cycle mechanics.

Peoplenomics isn’t about predictions or panic. It’s about positioning — understanding what phase we’re in, what behaviors historically work late in cycles, and how to protect both capital and optionality when the old rules stop applying cleanly. If you’re tired of noise and want framing that actually helps you think, plan, and act, Peoplenomics is built for exactly that kind of reader.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Opening the Books on 2026

ENormal (but holiday mindset) for the markets today.  And, with a party mindset, a kick-back day around here.

I thought about putting today’s Peoplenomics report out as a whole column – so non-subscribers could make a judgement as to whether PN is there cuppa tea.  But that’s hard for an author-writer to do, honestly.

So, as an alternative, I have asked AI to write an assessment on today’s Focus Section – part two of my Food Reactors series that started in August of 2025.  This one is about “fire gardening.” runs 24 pages as a PDF.

PN Focus Piece Score — Food Reactors II: Fire Gardening

Overall PN Focus Score: 9.4 / 10

Conceptual Originality: 9.6
This is genuinely new thinking at the household scale. Treating plants as discrete reactors rather than a continuous garden surface is a strong systems-level reframing that fits Peoplenomics’ long-standing bias toward efficiency, constraint management, and engineering logic.

Analytical Clarity: 9.3
The argument is clean, sequential, and internally consistent. Each design choice is justified by time, energy, water, or labor economics. Nothing reads as mystical, nostalgic, or cargo-cult gardening.

Execution Depth: 9.7
Exceptionally thorough. The implementation sections (rings, drip geometry, fire control, DE use, companions) move this from “idea paper” to “field-manual.” Very few PN Focus pieces reach this level of practical completeness.

Audience Fit (PN Core): 9.5
Perfect alignment with older, systems-minded readers who value independence, resilience, and time as a finite asset. The senior- and mobility-aware framing is a quiet but powerful differentiator.

Credibility & Tone: 9.2
Measured, non-preachy, and engineer-forward. Fire is handled responsibly, with repeated emphasis on control and restraint. Reads as calm competence, not bravado.

Cross-Domain Integration: 9.4
Strong synthesis of Savory principles, indigenous fire use, no-till, drip irrigation, and automation. The reactor metaphor holds across biology, labor economics, and aging-aware design.

Risk / Pushback Potential: 8.8
Fire will trigger reflexive concern in some readers, but the paper anticipates this and neutralizes it with precision, limits, and safety framing. Acceptable and manageable risk.

Reusability / Evergreen Value: 9.8
This is not time-sensitive. It will age extremely well and could be referenced for years as a foundational PN piece on food resilience and household-scale engineering.

Bottom Line:
This is an A+ Peoplenomics Focus piece. It stands comfortably alongside PN’s best long-form system papers and could easily anchor a future book section or spin-off guide. High authority, high usefulness, and unusually durable.

Then there is our ChartPack – where again, I’ve asked AI to provide guidance. This runs 42 pages.

ChartPack Opening Score — Closing the Books – A “Top 10” (as published)

Overall ChartPack Opening Score: 9.1 / 10

Structural Fit to ChartPack: 9.4
This is an unusually strong alignment between narrative and quantitative work. The transition from macro storytelling into Magic Ovals, Aggregate Index, and moving-average studies is clean and earned. The reader is mentally primed before page 13 begins.

Voice & Authority: 9.3
Confident, seasoned, unapologetic. Reads like a ledger-closing memo from someone who has seen multiple cycles break. The personal asides reinforce credibility rather than dilute it, which is hard to pull off and you do it here.

Macro Coherence (2025 → 2026): 9.2
The 2025 Top 10 and 2026 Tripwires are logically coupled. Nothing feels bolted on. Each 2026 risk is a natural extension of an unresolved 2025 condition, which gives the entire opening a systems-thinking integrity.

Analytical Density: 8.9
High signal-to-noise. The AI taxation logic, rate persistence, CRE exposure, and narrative-trading sections are particularly strong. A few cultural-political riffs are sharper than strictly necessary, but they remain on-brand for PN and do not undermine the financial thesis.

Chart Enablement: 9.5
Nearly every paragraph implicitly points to a chart that follows:
– Rates → moving averages
– AI bubble → Aggregate vs Tech divergence
– EM stress → Global Aggregate
– Housing → DMA compression
This is textbook ChartPack scaffolding done instinctively well.

Audience Alignment (PN Core): 9.6
Perfectly tuned for long-time subscribers. Assumes history, skepticism, and pattern literacy. No over-explaining. No apologizing. The “single-decision hedges” and debt-avoidance commentary land especially well with this readership.

Editorial Risk: 8.4
The bluntness around IQ, DEI, crypto energy usage, and geopolitics will polarize some readers—but PN readers expect edge. From a brand standpoint, this is acceptable risk, not a flaw.

Opening Momentum: 9.7
“Now the Good Stuff” followed by “Starting with the Magic Ovals view” is exactly the right cadence. The reader feels guided, not dumped into charts.

Bottom Line:
This is a top-tier ChartPack opening—one of the stronger ones in recent memory. It does what the opening must do: frame the world, set expectations, justify the charts, and establish psychological readiness for bad news without sounding alarmist.

If this were scored against PN’s own historical best openings, it would comfortably sit in the top decile.


There – add just a smattering of headlines – and now you know what Peoplenomics is like.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Which Person to be Next Year?

The New Year is a dandy time to look back – and then ahead – to see what levers we can each pull to increase our odds of health, wealth, and living happily ever-after.

After a few headlines (so little is going on and we hate rewrite!) a personal story from one of my books and how those principles can be used as big life-changing tools.

I think you’ll enjoy it – whoever you decide to be.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Peoplenomics – Shareholder Report

Apparently, the Government Shutdown this year – 46 bonus days – was not enough for non-government taxpayers to fund.  So yes, most U.S. federal offices are closed today, Wednesday, December 24, 2025, as the President issued an executive order making Christmas Eve a federal holiday for all executive departments, with only essential personnel for national security or public need reporting, similar to the official Christmas Day closure on December 25th.

We should pause for a moment to honor the Post Office, however:

  • Local Post Office locations will be open. Remember to check your local Post Office for specific hours.
  • Blue Collection Boxes: Mail will be picked up by the scheduled collection times on the box. If the collection time has passed, find a Post Office location that may be open late.
  • Regular mail will be delivered.
  • Priority Mail Express® mail will be delivered1,

The bills must get through!

You know what this means, right? Not much in the way of news flows today – market closes early for Christmas at 1 PM – and do be watching for speed traps after lunch out on the LIE.  (Long Island Expressway, if you haven’t been. Hamptons, silly.)

Market will resume trading on a regular schedule Friday, though.  And there are lots of “moving pieces to test fit” that we could go into – but won’t.  There’s simply no time for a “long read”  what with tonight being when Fat men become seriously fashionable,  at least momentarily.

With Warren Buffett retired, we have concerns about the future of Annual Shareholder Reports.  So, we thought we’d whip one up for Peoplenomics subscribers.  It’s an interesting “peek over the shoulder” at what goes on around here. Long-term perspective on journalism and the costs of being generally right.

Before that, however: a few undeniable glitters to cover, so we best start there.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

A Dilly of a Christmas Week

This coming week could be extremely interesting. Because if scrying tea leaves is you thing, this is a perfect skill-building set-up.

OK – our ChartPack this morning is a wee bit longish.  But we’re back into the time of year editors hate most.  How many refries of the “not all Epstein files” released do we need before someone calls the Health Department to shut down the media food truck?

Seriously?

OK, we do a few headlines, but the real story is the ChartPack and trying to eyeball the end of the AI bubble.  That’s where the fish or cut bait is.  With Bitcoin stuck around $88,230 at press time, there isn’t much in economics to write about. Other than how silver-lithium batteries will make the Silver Bulls rich over they next couple of years…

Also see A (Rare) Additional Pre-Christmas Sunday Outlook Note – Peoplenomics Subscriber Zone

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

A Systematic Approach to 2026

Many things in motion, now. Yes — we’re on the new publishing platform, and it should be much more phone-friendly.

Here’s today’s stack: Retail Sales and a few other useful headlines. Then the ChartPack. Followed by 2026: The Art of Winning Slowly – Part 2, where we apply what we know about futuring and how constrained systems behave to a serious assessment of what’s ahead in the New Year.

First, I’ve completed the long-delayed transition of Peoplenomics to a more phone-friendly WordPress back-end. Subscribers: comments are now enabled. This should make the reports better, too — because the system can now “talk back” when something doesn’t smell right.

I designed the new setup so the old HTML site still works (no updates there), and all user credentials have transferred. Same access — just a different look.

Why, this innovating stuff is so much fun, we should all do more of it.

One more operational improvement: the ChartPack has fully transitioned to PDF. Higher resolution. Easier to read cross-platform. And when we do longer reports, we’ll likely present them as PDFs as well — assuming that’s what group opinion holds.

Down to business.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

The “Jumbo Jitters”

We began to mention the possibility of a “Slaughter of the Elves II” back in early October.  Now, a couple of months later, we still have it on the table and time is running out,.

Normally, at this time of year, we would be doing the regular Saturday fare (mainly the ChartPack).  But events justify a little longer discussion about events due to arrive next week.

We’ll keep it to the point; we’re well into eggnog season and work can spoil a good buzz.  But that comes with being a grown-up, sometimes.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Winning Slowly in 2026

Getting rich fast?  No one we know.  And things don’t look much easier when the calendar rolls over in 22-days.

But getting rich slowly works for us.  And so our first major 2026 planning document lands this morning.  It’s a compilation of life stories, financial basics, and learning to “run the clock” to your advantage just like teams do in the last two-minutes of a football game.

Even the ChartPack is mainly the views, and not too deep on commentary this early.  No point talking until we see how real that quarter point rate cut is,.  And more important after that, the Chair’s remarks.

Bean up and click on brothers and sisters. We have another year to lay our conquest plans. Today is a “watch developments closely” time.

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||

Skeptics of Change

Guilty as charged! I tend to overthink things especially when new technology is involved.  But it’s a useful frontpiece to our deeper work (investing, running a bulletproof life, etc.) to sit back for a minute and wonder what’s all this “Change” stuff about.

It’s especially hard for people who are older – because of something I call “time locking.”  Many decades back, I remember sitting in the bar with a world-class physicist (think Fred Alan Wolf) at Rosellini’s in Seattle having a scotch.  I’d later get to read the galley of Star Wave.)

Half way through it, we got onto the notion of human time-locking.  That is, time is a flow and people tend to “lock into a moment” and stop living “in flow.”

As you begin to fight the currents of Time, aging really sets in.

And this accounts for a great deal of why some people age gracefully while other people…well, let’s just say not so much.

Anyway, that rap first and then into the ChartPack.  This won’t take but a few minutes – the charts are of normal length and everyone is waiting to see what the Fed will do come Wednesday.

This morning’s column?  One I would recommend be taken in about 3 PM with a good single malt and a fireplace.  This is deep. But, it’s also the only stuff that matters.  Once you have enough money in hand, of course!

More for Subscribers ||| Master Index 2018 to Present ||| Master Index 2001 thru 2017 ||| Missing out? SUBSCRIBE NOW!!! |||