My posts are now being littered with WordPress Ads over which I have no control.
(Maybe it is their way of discouraging free wordpress blogs, hoping one will subscribe to be rid of them. It certainly does not generate any income for them on my blog with few readers)
Please do not encourage them by clicking on any of the ads.
I now have share buttons on each of the articles.
WHERE Are the disciples who make disciples as commanded by JESUS?
And feel free to reblog any article.
This is a resource page (no regular postings) of texts and their neglected contexts.
Permission granted to copy/paste any post, or to print and distribute in any manner, those posts of which I am the author ( a few posts are reblogs, written by others). Please note the source when doing so: https://textsincontext.wordpress.com/ ©mikesnow.org
HOW does each day begin?
“And God said…”
Underline that phrase in each verse. WHERE in the text does each day begin?
Circle the numbers of these verses with “And God said…”
We have verse 3, verse 6, verse 9 (&11)
Verse 14, verse 20, verse 24…
Thus, we have WHEN Each Day Begins in the Text
Some versions translate “And” as “Then” which makes it more clear. Three modern versions just drop “And” thus taking away the context.
Verse 2 tells us the condition of this created Earth.
The last condition in verse 2 is “darkness”
On Day 1 of preparing Earth for the creation of man, God dispels that darkness with light (verse 3).
[A note of interest—The Hebrew text uses cardinal numbers–one, two, three…for the days, not ordinal numbers– first, second, third…]
In First Corinthians, the Apostle Paul confronts sins of the Christians, the saints, at Corinth.
He begins, “I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ…”
The first sin he confronts is the division caused by a ‘spiritual’ party spirit. “I am of Paul”…”I am of Apollos”…”I am of Cephas”…”I am of Christ.”
The next sin confronted: “It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you…”
He notes that the Corinthians have become “puffed up” (4:6). That is addressed again in Chapter 13. (Link)
When he comes to marriage, the Apostle Paul clearly distinguishes between his mature advice for the unmarried, and the clear command of Christ Jesus to the married.
“Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to separate from her husband and a husband is not to divorce his wife.”
That is the whole of the Lord’s command, no more, no less. That is the word of the Lord Jesus.
The Corinthians did not know this teaching of our Lord Jesus Christ. Paul, here, reveals it to them. Today, everyone with a Bible knows this command.
Chapter Seven begins, “Now concerning the things you wrote to me…”
Paul is addressing the situation in Corinth, and thus, in the middle of the quote of our Lord’s explicit command he gives his own command regarding a Corinthian wife who had already left her husband—Greek aorist, i.e. past tense. The New International Greek Testament Commentary notes that “unless the middle clause is placed in parenthesis, the sense becomes confusing, and even risks misleading.”
Many of today’s Christians use that situation to detract from and condone or even to counsel disobedience to our Lord Jesus Christ’s clear command to the church and to the married.
Eric Metaxas interviewed Michael Youssef who confronts the evil gender ideology of our present day while speaking the truth in love. And Metaxas makes an astute observation on the state of our church in America, today:
“Actually, where this all started in the church, I would say, is with divorce….When the church allowed that, or looked the other way, you began to see the creep…the idea that people start saying, ‘you know what, it’s sort of true, you only go around once…let’s not worry too much about right and wrong’…how can you blame somebody with same sex attraction, saying, ‘hey, I don’t want to be celibate…I want to enjoy life’ because the heterosexuals have done precisely that, and that is the failure of the church…”
Metaxas goes on to note his shock at news of friends divorcing, and asks, “Where did you get the idea that this was permissible? What church do you go to? What kind of pastor do you have…?”
Michael Youssef responds to this present day scenario in the church as “exactly the secular thinking.”
They Commit Two Major Sins.
–They Reject the Bible and the Standard it sets for Establishing the Truth of a Matter.
–They Slander Men of Faith and Courage.
Faithful Witnesses: The Resurrection, and The Moon Landings (Liink)
Hubris and Sloth are the underlying sins of those aberrant Christians who deny the Moon landings. Pray for their repentance.
I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.–Romans 12
“… do not be conformed to this world…”
A stark example of this can be seen in the many Christians in the American Colonial era who were slave holders, including members of denominations such as the Quakers. Two startling examples among Christians who stand out as slave owners are Jonathan Edwards, America’s premier theologian, and George Whitefield, the key preacher during the Great Awakening.
In the face of the abolitionists of his day, Jonathan Edwards penned a defense of a pastor who, like himself, owned slaves. Church historian George Marsden quotes Edwards writing: “the Bible expressly allowed slavery and it would not contradict itself.”
Regarding George Whitefield, Prof. Thomas Kidd writes, “Whitefield became connected with slave masters who had converted under his ministry, and though he never publicly retracted his criticisms of the institution, he complied with his wealthy friends’ offers to give him slaves and a South Carolina plantation. More importantly, Whitefield became convinced that he needed slaves to work at a Georgia plantation to fund the operations of his Bethesda orphanage.”
More than that, George Whitefield stood against Georgia’s ban on slavery. Thus, “he became arguably the colony’s leading proponent of slavery’s legalization.”
In spite of these prominent evangelical leaders, every-day Christians did not remain silent.
John Woolman stands out as one superlative example. During this period of the Great Awakening, Woolman’s conscience was unsettled when his employer directed him to write a bill-of-sale for a Negro woman being sold to another Quaker. It was 1742 and John Woolman was twenty-two.
Four years later, in 1746, Woolman wrote an anti-slavery essay, “On Keeping Negroes.” Much of his life, thereafter, was spent traveling among the Quaker Meetings in the Colonies, exhorting them to end this sinful practice among Friends. The end result: By 1776 American Quaker Meetings banned the ownership of slaves among their members.
Still, here in America in 1860, slave owners burned Charles Spurgeon’s printed sermons in protest against his anit-slavery stand. “I do, from my inmost soul, detest slavery anywhere and everywhere, and although I commune at the Lord’s Table with men of all Creeds, yet with a slaveholder, I have no fellowship of any kind.”
Fast forward to Today, and to Michael Reeves’ comment (above) which was in response to my question at the Spurgeon Library Conference. “I find it fascinating as a Brit, hearing that question being put…”
I opined that we do not burn his sermons today, but asked what might be the parallels between those sermon-burning Civil War era Christians and the reaction of American Evangelicals, today, towards Spurgeon’s clear words on war and Christians.
Here is a good summation of Spurgeon’s stand:
The typical American Evangelical response might well be the same as that of Jonathan Edwards (above), paraphrased as, “ “the Bible expressly allowed war and it would not contradict itself.”
Yet, as in John Woolman’s day, there are every-day Christians who do not remain silent. I can tell you of another twenty-two year old who was pricked in conscience and four years later was writing against Christians going off to war.
Here is a summation of my question and the response at the Spurgeon Library Conference.
Romans 12-13 Background and Context
Spurgeon Memes on War and Christians
This is the video of Michael Reeve’s response.
TITUS 2: But as for you, teach what accords with sound doctrine. 2 Older men are to be sober-minded, dignified, self-controlled, sound in faith, in love, and in steadfastness. 3 Older women likewise are to be reverent in behavior, not slanderers or slaves to much wine. They are to teach what is good, 4 and so train the young women to love their husbands and children, 5 to be self-controlled, pure, working at home, kind, and submissive to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be reviled. 6 Likewise, urge the younger men to be self-controlled. 7 Show yourself in all respects to be a model of good works, and in your teaching show integrity, dignity, 8 and sound speech that cannot be condemned, so that an opponent may be put to shame, having nothing evil to say about us. 9 Bondservants are to be submissive to their own masters in everything; they are to be well-pleasing, not argumentative, 10 not pilfering, but showing all good faith, so that in everything they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior.
11 For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people, 12 training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age, 13 waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, 14 who gave himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works.
In our American memory-verse world, few Christians bother with reading texts of God’s word in context. Thus, the “Beam me up, Scotty!” crowd grabs onto “waiting for our blessed hope” as a tag-line for their extra-biblical doctrine in which God whisks them away from Earth, leaving their clothes, cars, and mid-air airplanes behind, lest they suffer God’s wrath (Link, read). Apparently, they do not trust the Blood on their door posts.
Corrie ten Boom:
And the primary motive driving our “obedient response,” is that “we look expectantly for the hope and glory of the Second Coming of ‘our Savior Jesus Christ.’”
Titus Two begins “teach what is in accord with sound doctrine…” Its purpose is to illicit “our obedient response”
“…as to how we should live ‘in the present age.’”
“We live from the vantage point of ‘expectantly awaiting’ and ‘looking forward to’ Christ’s appearing.” [Expectantly waiting] “has as its object two nouns [Grk] ‘hope,’ and [Grk] ‘appearing’…”
“Paul uses the concept of ‘hope’ of the expectancy that Christians have for the unseen and sure, but not yet realized…Paul speaks of this hope in 1 Thess. 4:13-18…Christ’s return...”
“The ‘hope’ and the ‘appearing’ are one event…Jesus’ second appearance…”
“Jesus’ second coming.”
Verse 11 pointed to Christ’s First Appearing in the Incarnation, bringing salvation. Verse 13 points us to His future Appearing in Glory, bringing consummation.
Therefore, be “a people for himself…zealous for good works” based on “sound doctrine.”
Quotes from The New International Greek Testament Commentary, Titus, George W. Knight III, Eerdmans, 1992.
Matthew 10
21Brother will deliver brother over to death, and the father his child, and children will rise against parents and have them put to death, 22 and you will be hated by all for my name’s sake. But the one who endures to the end will be saved….
32 So everyone who acknowledges me before men, I also will acknowledge before my Father who is in heaven, 33 but whoever denies me before men, I also will deny before my Father who is in heaven.
34 “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. 36 And a person’s enemies will be those of his own household. 37 Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. 38 And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39 Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.
An outrageous example of the bane (the poison) of Memory-Verse-Theology derives from the saying of Jesus, “I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.”
Ripped from its context, it gives to us Christians the warrant to march off to war and shed blood, a la these self-made, pseudo-theologians who put themselves forward as ‘teachers’ in the Church. [And these same wooden, illiterate literalists do the same with “Buy a sword…” Link ]
The parallel of this saying of Jesus in Luke 14:
25 Now great crowds accompanied him, and he turned and said to them, 26 “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple. 27 Whoever does not bear his own cross and come after me cannot be my disciple.
Both these passages address “The Conditions of Discipleship,” or in the title of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s famous classic, “The Cost of Discipleship.”
Here in Luke (as in Matthew) we see the “hyperbolic form, which is an authentic part of Jesus’ teaching…Nowhere is the diverse character of the Kingdom’s advent seen more clearly than in the severance of family loyalties” a la I. Howard Marshall in the New International Greek Testament Commentary. Such is a noted feature in Jesus’ parables. For examples see “Shock and Awe.” (Link) Hyperbole serves to grab the attention of Jesus’ listeners.
As to this hyperbolic saying in Luke (and in Matthew) about family, surely, any true Christian knows we are to love all people, even our enemies. (Link)
In Second Thessalonians, Chapter 2 (the body and main focus of this letter), Paul addresses some sort of misunderstanding that has disturbed these new Christians. He does not know the source of that confusion, whether it be a prophetic or a written word (verse 2), but he comes right to the point to set them straight. “Do not let anyone deceive you in any way…”
—The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Colin Brown, ed. (1976) s.v. “Present”
Their confusion is about the “when?” of the Parousia (verse 1). The prepositional phrase–”Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him”— is the subject of their befuddlement. This phrase is “a reference to the event described in 1 Thess 4:17, [also 2:19; 3:13] when the people of Christ (whether resurrected or surviving to the Parousia) will be transported to meet him and be eternally with him.”–F. F. Bruce, WBC.
That “coming” (parousia) and “gathering” (episynagoge) are one event as the single article (the) makes plain. “Indeed, they are the two parts of one great event.”–Leon Morris, New International Commentary on the New Testament.
“The noun episynagoge in 2 Thess. 2:1 refers to the ‘gathering together’ of believers to Christ at the Parousia.”–Dictionary of New Testament Theology
What has disturbed these Thessalonian Christians is the question of “when”–the question of timing.
The new “word” they had received from somebody (verse 2) confused some and led others astray–What? “ …the Day of the Lord has already come”??? Now? Later? Already?
Paul makes it crystal clear to them: Before the Parousia (verse 1), in the proper order of these things, FIRST (πρῶτον) must come the rebellion and the man of lawlessness (verse 3).
Justin Martyr clearly understood this in the early 2nd Century: “…the two advents of Christ have been announced, the first, in which he is shown as suffering, without glory, without honor, subject to crucifixion, and the second, in which he shall come from the heavens in glory, when the man of apostasy, who utters arrogant things against the Most High, will boldly attempt to perpetrate unlawful deeds against us Christians.“
“Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction” 1 Thess. 2:3
Matthew 24. Jesus: “Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. “
Addendum
The million dollar Left Behind Industry either ignores this text, or explains away this passage of Scripture by juggling the text out of context and imposing the traditions and imaginations of men upon the Sacred Text (eisegesis), but when we allow God’s word to speak in context (exegesis), this sequence of events is crystal clear here.
One of the historical consequences of false or confused teaching is the tragic effect on everyday believers. Corrie Ten Boom quoted a Chinese bishop on one such heart-rending consequence:
1st Thessalonians Laid out in Context, Here (link).… Give reading in context an HONEST try. Remember the Great Commandment, to love God with all your mind.
“These are the ones coming out of the great tribulation. They have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.” –Rev. 7
(Be a disciple of Jesus and read that Verse in CONTEXT, here- LINK)
Social media are replete with Christians crying for that day, while rejecting any thought that they might have to face the great tribulation. “God did not appoint us to wrath.”
Yet, many Left Behinders point to their preparations for those who will be left behind. Years ago, a lady in our church stated that she had videos on her desk for family that would explain why they were left behind when she was gone. R. C. Sproul recounted a tour given by Kathryn Kuhlman of her office. She had a large closet safe with her radio program recordings so that the Gospel would still be preached should the Rapture come in her lifetime. (Apparently, she did not expect all of her staff nor all the Christian radio personnel to be raptured.)
Kevin Sorbo in his movie, The Rise of the Antichrist (2023), is left behind and convinced of the Gospel by a video left behind by the pastor of his ‘raptured’ wife. (Details and review of that movie, here—LINK)
Typically, a Jack Graham Powerpoint sermon, The Blessed Hope, turns Titus’ expectation of the Second Coming into The Rapture. “When the salt and light is (sic) gone, that is, true believers, then decay and darkness sets in….Hell will be unleashed on earth….then, terrible retribution…you don’t want to be left behind for the great tribulation.”
BUT what about those videos and books and letters left behind for families and friends by these Left Behinders? You mean none of them will be saved? What about Kevin Sorbo? Oh, you say, ‘yes, some will be saved during the great tribulation.’
The end result of the Left Behinder’s escape hatch exit to miss the great tribulation is that there will be no salt nor light nor shepherds for those new Christians like the Kevin Sorbos who will be saved after the ‘Rapture’ but who are condemned to suffer God’s wrath a la the Left Behind scenario.
From Corrie Ten Boom:
RememberIRAQ Crisis? That country with missiles and a hostile, neoNazi army shelling residents on our own American border that we, the USA, did invade? (Do I have to say, “sarcasm”?)
February 9, 1990: U.S. Secretary of State James Baker gives ““iron-
clad guarantees” –NATO would not expand: “not one inch
eastward”– to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. Declassified
documents show security assurances against NATO expansion given
to Soviet leaders by Sec. Baker, Pres. Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, et al.
Russian Population in Donbass Protests New Government. 20 October, 2014, New York Times Reports: Ukraine launches USA Cluster Bombs into heart of Donetsk, city of over 1 million people.
NOW, Half a Million BODIES of UKRAINE Soldiers. “Fighting to the last Ukrainian” a la President Biden and Senator Linsey Graham.
The WAR In the DONBASS Video THIS is when the war began: Ukraine shelling its Russian citizens.
Ukraine Debacle Key Quotes, here.
Full TIMELINE from start of the war in 2014 https://consortiumnews.com/2025/02/25/ukraine-timeline-tells-the-tale/
Zelenskyy elected President in 2019 as the “peace” candidate. He could not implement the MINSK accords which would have ended the fighting. since the Ukraine NeoNazis said they would hang him if he did so . https://zeitgeistcontext.wordpress.com/2023/02/25/ukraine-resource-photos-neonazis/
CONTEXT. Remember that word.
Prof. Gentry, in this outstanding video, gives us rock solid exegesis of Isaiah 14. For an equally outstanding exposition of Isaiah 14, in print, see John Oswalt‘s magnum opus, Isaiah, in The New International Commentary on the Old Testament series (NICOT).
Franz Delitzsch, Isaiah (1890), quotes Luther on this tradition of Isaiah 14:12 referring to Satan, as “insignis error totius papatus” i.e. “a noteworthy error of the papacy” … Calvin’s commentary also repudiates this error as “arising from ignorance.”
What the expositors rejected during the Reformation, had a comeback with the publication of the Schofield Bible in 1908, which took up the old typology. The tradition of men lives on.
Strongs: “the morning star”
lucifer (note NOT capitalized in Strongs) is simply the Latin translation (Jerome, 4th Century A.D.)
From the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (free online) They give just one sentence under the entry for lucifer: “lu’-si-fer, loo’-si-fer: The morning star, an epithet of the planet Venus.”
From the Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, Harris, Archer, Waltke (pub by Moody Press) “Our root represents the giving off of light by celestial bodies [i.e. planets, stars]”
“It is natural for a heathen king to boast that he would exalt himself above the gods or above the mountain where he believed the gods assembled.”
“sapon (Isa 14:13) is well known in Ugaritic as the mountain of the gods. The God of Israel is not enthroned on Saphon; he reigns from heaven itself (cf. hekal).”
The Latin, lucifer (morning star) is the translation (4th Century A.D. in [Latin] Vulgate) of the Greek heosphoros (Venus, ὁ ἑωσφόρος) used in the LXX –(the Greek translation of the Old Testament made by Jews in the 3rd Century B.C.)– to translate the Hebrew, heylel
TextsInContext 