Citizen journalism frightens liberals. It scares the hell out of them. It should. Leonard Pitts, Eugene Robinson and Herb Strentz are unconstitutional.
Oh what a slippery life, excuse me road, I’ve ventured upon. And just when you thought your life was filled with tremendous responsibility along “cometh” Leonard Robinson and Eugene Pitts — beg your pardon, Leonard Pitts and Eugene Robinson. LOL. No worries, I shan’t continue to kick a “gift horse” in the mouth forever.
It hath been said that “judgment begins in the house of God;” so I guess, I’m preaching to the choir as much as I am anyone else.
It’s easier for me to pick on Leonard Pitts and his mantra: “Moderate people need to band together…” — ad nausea; translation: As long as you think like us…next.
Oh where to start, Eugene Robinson, where to start? Let’s start with that which follows, shan’t we sir? Can the hatred that it takes to fly a civilian plane into a center for commerce be equated to the hatred Hitler had for Jews? Well Mr. Robinson? I am waiting, painfully waiting, for an answer to the aforementioned question. Have you the wisdom, unlike our Commander and Chief, to respond to my question. Allow for me to assist you in answering my first question. Yesitcan! Have you the courage to publicly “sallie forth” and slay an argument put forth, initially, by Newt Gingrich and restated by yours truly? I must say though sir that both you and Mr. Pitts take nice photos — you both clothe so nicely in shirt and lie.
May I quote you sir, if only a few times? Oh, this is going to get fun! “Gingrich invents an enemy and then demands to know why others haven’t sallied forth to slay it.” Well sir, I’ve an answer to your bidding expression — a question that is not. The same reason that so many will defend the likes of Torey Breedlove while demonizing honorable, otherwise contrite men like Florida father James Jones. They don’t like to look in the mirror. It’s not comfortable for any of us to stand in front of the mirror today but at least I, like Mister Jones, realize as much. At least conscientious Americans realize as much. I know that we are a dying breed and soon your type and your world will flourish and yet your team’s season will be cut painfully short. Our hope has a name and it’s not Obama.
I’ve friends from England. Their freedom is not desirable. They can no longer fly the flag of their homeland or teach about the Holocaust because their attempt to do so, no surprise, is offending Muslims. Silly me, I thought Nazi Germany was responsible for the Holocaust. The Holocaust was horrific — even painfully sinful. I’m sorry sir Pitt’s, is it legal to use words like “horrific” and “malice” in your new world order. Notice how I’ve sallied back and forth betwixt having spoken to Robinson and Pitts? Both Pitts and Robinson are status quo and, by default, an easy target — for those of us who actually are able to think for ourselves. On a side, yet related note, I’m sure that Alex Sink and the Young Turks, who’ve a combined IQ of seventy-four love you guys though — what little they actually understand. I never imagined, in my wildest dreams, just how the new world order might play out. The scales have fallen from my eyes: neither Oprah’s dictionary nor her book club recognize “sin.” What a brave new world we live in. I, for one, am not goo-goo for Gaga or crazy for Coco puffs. I’ve learned the hard way: today’s “Gossip Girl” are the “Hellcats” of tomorrow. We’ve so much to be proud of.
Imagine if white folk from thirty-eight states; stay with me now on this one, decided it was offensive for our schools to speak of slavery seeing that much white settlement occurred after the Southeast had been settled. Are you listening Mister Robinson? Oh, my bad the sole objective of “Whitey” is to divide and conquer, right? I suspect more than a few of your kind actually believe that those from Iowa who voted for Obama are actually suffering from schizophrenia and have once again decided to go under hood. Laughable.
Moving on. Mr. Robinson, you choose to quote Andrew Silow-Carroll within the same article. May I partially quote him here — if even by default? Sir? “First the system worked – the judge made a bone-headed call, and he was overturned.” I could take you both to school concerning the term “system” but I won’t – at least not today. And what of the two months sleep the New Jersey woman probably lost due to a system that “you’ve” by default said works? By default, your having quoted mister Silow-Carroll can be equated to a largely Islamic practice of hiding behind human shields during times of war. The only way to fix your system is to put all U.S. judges “on notice.” They, without exception, need to understand there will be grave consequences for having exercised “bone-headed” judgment — which thing none of us should ever take lightly. The left, in America, never seem to really understand that when one suffers, several others are affected.
Let’s put all U.S. judges “on notice!” A first offense, for example, should result in not being able to practice for a year. A second offense would result in having to take four years off — again without pay whereas when a judge is found guilty a third time, the judge should be forced into finding a new career. After all, our right to peaceable sleep and, at times, even our physical being hang in the balance but I wouldn’t expect the world to understand that which I’ve sallied forth to slay — namely your legal system. Odds are high that the New Jersey woman slept with one eye open for a couple of months. Can we put a price tag on that? Liberal Democrats seem to have a problem quantifying crime when a sole victim is involved.
How’s about mister Pitts, you, run right out and begin to extrapolate the numbers, city by city, of how many women have suffered at the hands of boneheaded judges — largely Obamesque Christians, “Christians” who truly obtained their power when a man who’s never inhaled began to play with words like “is” and his constituents listened. In your piece, Mr. Pitt’s, entitled, Nothing journalistic about citizen journalism, you said: “Journalism is hours on the phone nailing down the facts or pleading for the interview.” Get to work Mr. Pitts and extrapolate the aforementioned numbers — see the first sentence of this paragraph for a true assignment. Interestingly, you ended the selfsame piece with having said, “If you want, I have a few ideas.” Oh, poor, poor baby. O’Keefe, not unlike me, would like to know how our tax money is being spent. Can you say “ACORN?” I knew you could.
In turn, “gentlemen,” since this is my response, I’ll quote whomever I will. “The devil came not except to steal, kill and destroy.” Should I mention again gentlemen that the Hudson New Jersey woman, a Muslim, perhaps lost as much as two months of sleep. Nah, it couldn’t be: a Christian that cares about a single Muslim woman? Idiots. Godless folk have no right practicing law. When a fried lunch, a comfort car and comfort creatures, for example, Mark Sanford’s Maria Belen Chapur or Clinton’s Monica, become more important than how taxpayer dollars are actually spent, we’re truly in trouble. But, no worries, mates, I’m not the dean of a popular law school run by Union Mafioso. Your system, on the other hand, is p-a-i-n-f-u-l-l-y slow and certainly not without error. Mister Robinson, you by default referred to the 2009 Hudson New Jersey case as a single case. Unlike Gingrich, I’m not worried about Sharia law but I do worry about your “war machine” — you know the one that leftist media has perpetrated and, by default, left open for attack by yours truly. A system where it’s fun to poke-fun-of presidential hopefuls who walk funny or aren’t, by default, willing to throw away babies with Down Syndrome. Your war machine runs on Hollywood methane and bleeding heart liberalism.
What’s really bothering you Mr. Pitts? Is it the fact that James O’Keefe III has demonstrated that he can accomplish in a couple of days that which you’ve been unable to accomplish over the course of your career? O’keefe’s batting record aside, which is 1,000 by the way with only two at bats, intelligent taxpayers would like to know just what a citizen journalist might have uncovered had he been granted unfettered access to ACORN as a whole. You should be concerned as well. Do you pay taxes? I understand, all too well, that organizations which utilize taxpayer money should not be unduly burdened by truth — especially when an Obamagopoly might come under scrutiny. Let’s talk “foreign” intentions and public funding for a moment, shall we? Since you and your kind, claim the Constitution as your own, what would America’s founding fathers have thought about using taxpayer money to fund ACORN and, by default, whore houses?
On a side, yet related note, I suspect large charismatic churches are eager to help those within their congregations who’ve need. Not! They use Luke 6:38 to pilfer when the verse is about forgiveness and comfortably, perfectly even, sandwiched among other verses about forgiveness.
Quite frankly *ladies, I’d rather spend 1,000 years with children who’ve Down Syndrome than a day with a politician that proposes infanticide. *I’m waiting now for those “women” who’ve publicly stated that it’s somehow okay to refer to a woman as “whore,” today, to jump out of the woodwork in an attempt to “Sallie forth” and slay my next to last comment. Good day.