Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

I apologize profusely: I know I’m supposed to be retired from blogging, but just last night I opened a bottle that was simply too great not to tell you about.

The wine in question was Cogno’s 2006 Barolo Ravera, and I used the excuse of a simple but excellent dinner to see how the ‘06s were growing up. We had a really fine New York (not Texas) strip steak, which we broiled rare and accompanied by mashed potatoes enriched with an egg and two cheeses. You know: basic meat and potatoes, the sort of thing any red wine should effortlessly companion.

Cogno stands in the topmost tier of Barolo producers, but 2006 had been a tough vintage, so I wondered how the wine was developing. At 19 years old, it should be showing something, no?

Well, it showed us plenty. I pulled the cork two hours before we poured the wine. I should have done so five hours before, because the wine kept opening and growing more complex in the glass, showing more and more nuances, all the time.

On initial taste it came across as balanced and poised, with plenty of tannins that had softened into real suavity. At this point it tasted very young and fresh, with lots of generic Nebbiolo character. As I said, it kept changing, almost with every bite of food. That Barolo just kept growing in depth, complexity, and elegance – a very big wine in every sense. I’m not even going to try to describe the many different flavors that kept surfacing, lest I sound like a babbling idiot.

The briefest summary is that 2006 is an even better vintage than any of us in the wine writing trade had hoped, and it seems to have a very long and rich life still before it. If you’re lucky enough to have some, reverence it: It will repay your care.

Here, just FYI, is what I wrote about this very same 2006 Barolo 14 years ago.

Wine and Memory

Certain wines just live in your memory, always on call when wanted, and sometimes intrusive when uncalled for. One unforgettable, wonderful wine for me is Avvoltore, a wine from the Tuscan Maremma, a blend of mostly Sangiovese (it’s truly Tuscan, so what else?) and about 10% Cabernet sauvignon.

As Christmas approached this year, Avvoltore danced in my head, bringing along with it memories of my decades-ago visit to Moris Farms (the Spanish-English name of a fine Tuscan winery) and its wild boar-hunting, boar-raising producer, Adolfo Parentini. At the winery, Parentini poured his Avvoltore for me and a few other journalists to accompany his stufato di cinghiale – boar stew – and that forceful wine and that delicious, gamy meat were a marriage made in heaven. No question: I had to taste that combination again.

Well, thanks to D’Artagnan for the boar, some assiduous work on Wine Searcher for the Avvoltore (I lucked into a pair of bottles of the 1997 vintage, a very great year in Tuscany) and the enthusiastic cooperation of Diane for the cooking, our Christmas menu was set.

A few old friends joined us for the meal. We started lightly, with parmigiano flans lapped with tomato sauce. With them, we drank a 2004 Boca from Vallana, a lovely, beautifully balanced wine that easily handled the smooth richness of the flan and the acidity of the tomato sauce. This too was a wine of nostalgia: Diane and I used to drink a lot of those northern Piedmont wines, especially those from Vallana (Wonderful Spannas from Vallana!) back in the days when Vallana’s wines were better distributed in the US than they are now. Where are the snows of yesteryear, eh?

Then we proceeded to the main course. The dish and its interplay with the wine were every bit as marvelous as I remembered. The boar stew was as rich and gamy as you could wish, and the 27-year-old Avvoltore was amazing – incredibly young and vibrant, with deep, complex flavors of Maremma-grown Sangiovese understrapped by dark Cabernet tannins.

How to convey some sense of this? The wine’s color was deep garnet, clear and bright. Its nose intensely earth-and-dried-cherries, very big and pure. On the palate it was limpid and astonishingly fresh, deeply cherry-and-plum, with very soft tannins – a lot of them – and a long, long finish. A perfectly balanced wine, poised and composed, dominated by mature fruit flavors, interwoven with dark, earthy undertones.

That was an incredible dinner – pure enjoyment on every palatal level. You can dream all you want about white Christmases – I’ll take the memory of a red wine this fine every time.

*   *   *

And with that, dear friends, this blog too will pass into memory. This is my last post – no pun intended and no taps, please. I began the blog more than 15 years ago so I could write about wines and events that I was interested in and magazine editors weren’t; and so I could tell wine lovers about wines and makers and regions they might not otherwise hear about. I emphatically did not want it to be reports on what I drank yesterday – yet that is what, inevitably, it has become.

I’m almost 87 years old, and I was not a very great vintage to start with. I’m no longer an active wine journalist, so I don’t now have access to the tastings and trips (even if I were capable of them) that gave me the kind of information I can pass on to you. I’ve enjoyed writing recently about some of the more interesting – to me, at least – wines in my cellar and in my memory, but I can no longer provide the kind of useful information it was my original intention to offer. So it’s clear to me that it’s more than time for me to retire my quill pen, cap my inkwell, and say farewell. It has been a long ride, and great fun for me. I hope you have enjoyed it too.

Happy New Year, and many of them! Continue drinking good wine, no matter what your doctor tells you.

I’ve been brooding lately on the perilous state of my everyday wines. With a tariff-obsessed soft drinker about to take over Washington, the economic future doesn’t look good for us effete wine bibbers. Imported wines will rise in price – dramatically, I fear – because they must, and domestic wines will follow suit because they can.

That will leave those of us who drink wine every day in a difficult position. I think a lot of occasional wine drinkers will simply drop wine entirely, and that in turn could well mean the end of the wonderfully varied wine market we’ve been enjoying. There’s more than one way to bring back prohibition.

Even if things don’t come to that disastrous a pass, our wines – including our necessary-for-civilized-life everyday wines – are going to cost us a lot more, and probably will no longer be as readily accessible as they are now.

With that in mind, I’ve been surveying my chronic needs and preparing lists of my regularly consumed bottles, an exercise I seriously recommend to all of you who love wine. The lists will, of course, vary for each of you according to your palates and preferences, but they will all be a help in dealing with what’s to come. I find them especially helpful in keeping me focused when confronting those very attractive holiday sales that offer all sorts of rarities that I really don’t need but that can easily seduce me.

We cook and drink a lot of Italian and French in this household, so the simpler wines I want to have on hand naturally incline in those directions. Here’s the list I put together last week.

.

You’ll no doubt notice that most of those wines are listed generically. I certainly have preferred producers in almost all those categories (a few are noted in the list), but they may not always be available or available at a price I like, so when a need has to be filled quickly, I tend to take the best on the shelf within my price limits. For example: I recently acquired some of these wines from one of my regular shops, Astor Wines & Spirits.

  • They had in stock some of Chave’s beautiful Côtes du Rhône called Mon Coeur, which Diane and I love, so that was a no-brainer.
    .
  • The Chianti was more difficult: They didn’t have my first choice, Volpaia, but there were several other good ones, including the Felsina estate’s Berardenga at a very attractive price. Felsina lies very far south in the Chianti Classico, almost in the territory of Siena, so its wines tend to be bigger and more softly fruited than most Classicos, very approachable young, which is exactly what I wanted.
    .
  • Astor also had a lovely Dolcetto, Bricco Boschis-Scot, from Cavalotto, a very traditional Piedmontese producer and a long-time favorite of ours for its Barolo.

The white wines I picked up this time were all Italian: Falanghina Campi Flegrei from Agnanum; Friulano from Ronchi di Cialla; and Soave Classico Otto from Pra.

  • Re the Falanghina: Anyone who has visited Naples probably has memories of the Phlegraean Fields, a geothermally active area at the edge of the sea. The whole area is the caldera of an ancient volcano, so all the wines from there taste richly of minerals and volcanic soils, making them wonderful by themselves as aperitifs or alongside a very wide range of foods. That’s exactly what I want in an everyday white wine.
    .
  • Surprisingly, that same volcanic soil is what makes Pra’s Soave Otto so delightful: The Soave Classico zone contains the northernmost volcanic soils in Italy. Different grapes of course give it a completely different flavor from the Falanghina, but the mineral accents in the two wines do show some similarities.
    .
  • The Friulano is another animal entirely. This wine used to be called Tocai – EU regulations forced the change – but whatever you call it, it’s a great grape, and Ronchi di Cialis is a first-rate producer. It’s very versatile with all sorts of food, and if I had to choose one wine ever to have with a plate of prosciutto – especially if the prosciutto were San Daniele – it would be Friulano.

Those six wines are a good start on my hard-times-are-coming stockpile, and they probably convey a pretty clear idea of what I think one should look for in wines for every day. Whether you choose to get some now, as a precaution, or you opt to brave it out is up to you – but me, I like the comfort of knowing I’ll have what I want when the need arises.

Grappa is such a marvelous after-dinner drink, it constantly puzzles me that it isn’t more popular. The continuing – and frequently encountered – slur that grappa is jet fuel indicates to me either that people haven’t tried it for themselves, or if they have, they’ve chosen a poor example to match with their particular meal.

I can see how that could easily happen. After all, grappa isn’t one thing: It’s legion. It’s now distilled all over Italy, and everywhere it occurs it’s made from the local resources. That is to say, wherever a grappa is made in Italy, it’s distilled from the pomace of the grape varieties that grow in that region. A moment’s thought about the many varieties of Italian wine will give you some idea of just how many different kinds of grappa that can give rise to, each with its own varietal flavor and regional style to set it apart from any other grappa from elsewhere in Italy. If you approach grappa with the idea that it’s always the same thing – well, you’re bound to have problems.
.

.
Way back when Diane and I were embarking on our earliest journeys through Italy, wherever we had our dinner we always made it a point – especially if the local food was really good, as it was almost everywhere back then, before the tourist hordes descended – to ask if there was a local grappa. Invariably, the answer was a proud “there certainly is!” We got to taste a lot of different grappas that way, and I can honestly say we enjoyed them all.

Nowadays, when we have guests for dinner, we usually finish up by pulling out anywhere from two to six grappas (yes, I keep a lot of grappa around: It makes me feel secure), pulling out their corks, and urging everyone to just sniff the bottles before choosing one (or more: I’d never curb anyone’s enthusiasm) to drink.

.
The reason for that is simple: grappa, like wine, responds differently to different foods. A grappa that smells all cheesy after eggplant parmigiana might be richly floral after veal scaloppine, and different noses and palates might like either or neither. Among its many other pleasures, grappa makes for very interesting conversation as bottles pass from hand to hand and different reactions to it arise. (Among the many I’ve heard, never have I heard anyone say it tastes like jet fuel.)

Just as an example of how this works: one recent evening, Diane and I finished a supper with two fine cheeses, a lightly aged Manchego and a not-yet-runny Fromage d’Affinois. For the fun of it, I set out four grappas: two different monovarietal grappas of Barbera, a lightly barrel-aged blended Piemontese grappa, and a blended grappa of Friulian origin.

  • The first Barbera grappa, from Marolo, was distilled from the pomace of Barbera d’Alba.
  • The second, from Mazzetti d’Altavilla, I am 90% certain was distilled from the pomace of Barbera d’Asti.
  • The barrel-aged grappa, from Berta, was a blend of the pomace of two Piemontese varieties, but exactly which two I have not been able to discover.
  • The final grappa was from Jermann, distilled from Friulian pomace, almost certainly mostly if not exclusively of white varieties.

I thought these four grappas should be sufficiently different from each other to provide some interesting contrasts. I was certainly right about that. Not only were the grappas different from each other, but Diane’s and my responses to them differed too, sometimes slightly, sometimes widely.
.

.
Marolo Grappa di Barbera
is normally one of my favorites. This particular evening it smelled to me of generic red fruit, light and fresh. On the palate it was similar – light, fresh, and warming, with a long red fruit finish. Very pleasing. Diane picked up aromas of ripe grapes, stone, moss, and acid. For her, the palate showed some sweetness and sharp acidity.

The Mazzetti d’Altavilla Grappa di Barbera Giovane struck me as having a sharper, higher-toned nose than the Marolo – still the aroma of red fruit, but seemingly more acidic. On the palate, the grappa continued in the same vein, and it seemed very cleansing. Diane smelled some fruit, but predominantly fresh bread and cookie crumbs; on the palate she found it heavy and not at all fruity.

The aroma of Berta’s Monprà Grappa Invecchiata almost suggested sherry to me: sweetish, with wood vanilla masking the grapes. The palate was cognac-like, with less grappa character than I usually seek. I thought the finish quite sweet that evening, though I haven’t always thought it so. Diane distinguished steel, wood, and raisins in the aroma, and on the palate some nearly chemical (rather than wood) notes.

The final example, Jermann’s unpretentiously labelled Grappa, I would normally serve after a seafood dinner, but it followed up that evening’s cheeses quite well. Its nose struck me as very harmonious, very composed, with a distinct white grape character. In the mouth, it was smooth and warming, with an almost spicy finish, recalling Moscato. In all, quite lovely. Diane’s reaction here came closest to resembling mine, and we both agreed, to our surprise, that this was the digestivo of the evening.

That, of course, was one meal, one night. A few nights later we tried the same four grappas after a dinner of spareribs braised with oyster mushrooms, and our reactions were very different again. After that meal, we both chose the Marolo grappa as our digestivo.

Each evening, our chosen grappa did a wonderful job of rounding off the dinner and leaving us just a bit more content with our life. The amazing variety of grappa may seem a bit daunting, but think of it as simply one more component of your dining, a finishing touch that completes the experience. That’s not a difficult decision: That’s a pleasing prospect.

A Catch-All Post

I’m attempting to bring myself and my notes up to date, so this post features a grab-bag of interesting wines we’ve drunk lately, some poured for dinners with friends and some just for ourselves. Let me start at the top, with the most interesting – for several reasons – of this batch: 2004 Fontanafredda Barolo Serralunga d’Alba.
.

.
That very promising 2004 vintage is developing beautifully, and is still on an upward curve. Fontanafredda is one of the oldest and most prestigious estates in the Barolo zone. Once the property of the then-King of Italy, and long meticulously managed, Fontanafredda at its worst produces perfectly fine Barolos, and at its best turns out masterpieces. This 2004 bottling was one of those, beautifully balanced and elegant, with not a hint of fading. Rather, it showed remarkable freshness and spriteliness: a perfectly maturing Barolo.

It was also an innovation in Barolo. Traditional Barolo was always a blended wine — blended, that is, of Nebbiolo from different fields in different communes within the Barolo zone. Cru bottling, when it began in the late 1960s, was a tremendous novelty. Many arch-traditionalists would have none of it: For them, a single-vineyard wine couldn’t be a real Barolo. Well, the cru concept has won out, and most Barolo makers produce both a classic Barolo and one or more cru Barolos, with consumers making their choice of which pleases them or their budget best.

Early in this then-new century, a few producers began trying out a concept akin to what are called village wines in Burgundy – a wine that is not a blend of grapes from the whole Barolo zone, nor a single vineyard wine, but a blend of Barolos from different fields within a single commune.

Such is this present bottle from several vineyard parcels that Fontanafredda works within the commune of Serralunga d’Alba. In local lore, each of the communes that make up the Barolo zone has a distinctive character. So the concept of “village” wines within the Barolo DOCG is very interesting. In theory, that combination should produce a wine midway in character – and price – between a classic Barolo and a single-vineyard selection, while reflecting the nature and quality of the vines of their commune. In fact, depending on the circumstances of the vintage and the care of the producer, a commune wine has the possibility of being better (or worse) than a classic or a single-vineyard Barolo. It’s a new wrinkle in Barolo bottling and labelling, and a fascinating new dimension for Barolo lovers to explore.
.

On another evening I continued to press my luck with that 2004 vintage. I opened a 2004 Mascarello Barolo Monprivato.
.

.
Monprivato, located in Castiglione Falletto, is another of the most highly esteemed sites of the Barolo zone: It has been singled out in the land registers since the 17th century. In the hands of a branch of the Mascarello family for the past hundred years, it has been producing some of the most prized Barolos of all. But alas, this bottle was slightly disappointing – thinner and less richly fruited than seems right for the vintage. It was still a very good wine, but not a great one, as it really ought to be, both for the vintage and for the site’s reputation. Perhaps an off bottle? I hope so, because I have a few more of them.
.

One more evening, one more potentially very fine wine: 1998 Cantine Vignaioli Barbaresco.
.

.
This wine, from a well-thought-of coop, was unfortunately also a bit of a disappointment. It seemed slightly unbalanced: the fruit was big and forceful, but so was the acidity. The combination left a palatal impression of rusticity and simplicity that sorted badly with the wine’s age and vintage. The vintage was indeed noted for its heft – in this sense, this bottle showed true to type – but the best Barolo is always marked by elegance and restraint, both of which this bottle failed to show. As I said, not a disaster – far from that — but a disappointment.
.

For a few lighter dinners in the intervals of guests – we had been dining pretty richly and needed a bit of a respite – I opted for some of our favorite younger wines. The first of these was a 2021 Volpaia Chianti Classico.
.

.
No disappointment here, none at all: wonderful Sangiovese fruit, in a perfect balance of acid and soft tannins, and marked by Volpaia’s characteristic great elegance. This wine originates at one of the highest vineyards in the Classico zone: Some fields lie above 600 meters. Volpaia always performs to a very high standard, appropriate to its beautiful site and to the care that goes into its making.
.

The second young wine was 2021 Ridge Zinfandel Jimsomare.
.

.
I could use almost the same language to describe this wonderful Zin, originating on the famed Montebello Ridge and produced with incredible care and to exacting standards. I pulled this bottle to accompany a quintessentially American family meal – fresh corn, fried potatoes, and hamburgers made from freshly ground, top-quality sirloin from our favorite butcher. That quintessentially American wine made this as fine a feast as we could have asked for. The wine was distinctive: rich Zinfandel fruit laced with the vein of minerality that Montebello confers. We love Ridge Zins, but normally we opt for its old-fashioned field mixes: Zinfandel plus any number of other varieties, from Alicante to Barbera to Grenache and on. But on this occasion, we went with 100% Zinfandel, and that opulent Jimsomare flavor triumphed.

I hate the finality of that headline: The Last of Tom’s Treasures. Sure, it’s the last survivor of a small packet of older wines that I acquired about a year ago – but it’s far from the last good wine that I hope to drink or write about. It counts as a significant post house on my still-long (I hope) wine journey, but not the end of anything. Speriamo. Magari.
.

That said, let me happily tell you this was a magnificent wine, a serene grandfather Taurasi, perfect of its kind and absolutely true to type. I’d call it textbook, but no textbook was ever this exciting.

If it was a grandfather Taurasi, then the Mastroberardino family must be regarded as the great (in every sense) grandfather of Taurasi. Everybody in the wine world knows by now that, in the years following WWII, the Mastroberardinos saved Taurasi from disappearing into a sea of Cabernet and Merlot, never to be heard from again.

Italian wine generally was not held in much esteem in the 1950s and ‘60s, and southern Italian wines could honestly be said to be held in no esteem at all. Even in Italy, they were virtually unknown. Such excitement as Italian wine then generated came from Tuscany, largely from Sassicaia and what were soon to be known as Supertuscans: a very dark age for native Italian grapes and the wines made from them.

For those of us who loved Italian wine, Mastroberardino was a beacon of light in the prevailing darkness. The family led in championing Campania’s indigenous grapes – most important, the red Aglianico and the Taurasi it made, and the whites Fiano di Avellino and Greco di Tufo. By so doing, they saved the region from the scourge of international varieties that briefly won other regions some immediate attention but in the long run set native Italian wine back for a few decades. Thanks to them, Campania has remained a treasure house of indigenous grape varieties.

In addition, the Mastroberardinos created the standards that have made Campania the vibrant wine scene it is now. There are some of us – and I am emphatically one – who think that Mastro’s 1968 Taurasi Riserva is the finest single wine that Italy produced in the last century.

And now I found myself confronting the wine the family made just ten years after that triumph. Honestly, I had a small chill while pulling its cork. ’78 was a great vintage pretty much everywhere in Italy, and while I have tasted my share of 1978 Barolos and Barbarescos – hard wines, and slow to come around – I have not had a properly aged ’78 Taurasi. I had high hopes, but no certainty about what the bottle would yield.

.
Well, I’ve already told you that what it yielded was wonderful. In the glass, the wine showed only the thinnest of orange rims, not looking aged at all. The aroma was also surprising: tar, blackberry, dried roses – mature scents, but not aged ones.

The first taste showed similar notes, and then with the second came dried figs and plums and other dark fruits, all very balanced and elegant, not at all tired. The third taste gave leather, fruit leather, and meat – meat! – with a long finish of dried berries and leather. All these big, mature flavors came wrapped in a seamless robe of soft tannins, abundant but not assertive acidity, and perfect alcohol balance.

Those flavors appeared with our main course of braised beef. After that, with the cheese course, the Taurasi became completely cherry/berry sweet, lovely and fresh, seemingly with decades of life before it. This was an astonishing transformation: Cheese often changes wines, revealing more of their fruit core than other foods can, but a change this dramatic – an opening so thrillingly revelatory of a wine’s still-youthful core – is, in my experience, very rare.

This ’78 Mastroberardino Taurasi was a masterpiece of a wine, from a true master of the art. I could not have imagined a more perfect closure for my small set of serendipitously purchased wines. I only hope I have such luck again.

.

The Back Label

 

 

 

From a few questions and comments I’ve received lately, I think some of my recent posts have conveyed the impression that I drink exquisite old wines every day. I’m sorry to say that’s not so. I’m afflicted with a very ordinary budget, and Diane and I have been drinking through our long-ago-purchased, much-diminished cellar of great wines for more than a decade. So, like most regular wine drinkers, on a daily basis we drink a lot of inexpensive young wines with unprestigious labels.

That doesn’t mean they are anything less than enjoyable, however. Ordinary wine doesn’t have to be vin ordinaire, so to speak. As I’ve said on this blog before, we are living in a golden age of winemaking, so with even a small amount of attention to our shopping, it is pretty easy for us to drink well – and often – at reasonable expense.

I’ll give you some examples of our regular indulgences. As you would expect, these vary seasonally. Since we’ve been enduring summer temperatures, we’ve been drinking a lot of chilled white wines. One standby is Pra’s Otto, a Soave Classico of modest price and impeccable credentials. Light-bodied, fresh, fruity, and mineral, from a zone that contains Italy’s northernmost volcanic soils, Otto offers everything that you can ask for in a companion to warm-weather meals. We drink whatever vintage the market offers.

This is also true of Lugana. Our local store (Astor Wines & Spirits) supplies us with very nice bottles of this Lake Garda white, a 2023 from Ca’ Lojera. It’s fresh and mineral-inflected, quite tasty with light summer fare. It loves sushi, for instance.

We’ve also been enjoying Il Gentiluomo, an aptly named Cortese from Piedmont’s Monferrato DOC. Think Gavi, and you have the style and flavor of this wine, and at a much lower price than the more prestigious Gavi commands.
.

.
Among French whites, there is a very long list of simple wines, relatively inexpensive (inexpensive for French wine, that is: the better-known, longer-market-dominant wines of France always require a more serious commitment of dollars). In most summers in the past, we have consumed a lot of Muscadet, but this year our go-to wine with fish and shellfish has been basic Chablis. Simple AOC Chablis is now better made and more consistent than it has been in decades, and many fine examples are available here.

For white-meat dinners – chicken, pork, veal – we’ve been drinking a variety of both generic Macon Villages wines and those of named villages: Macon Vinzelles is our current favorite. This too, like Chablis, is a class of wines whose quality and uniformity have taken a great leap upward in the past decade. We’ve not had a bad, or even a mediocre, bottle of any of these moderately priced wines in longer than I can remember.
.

.
And we have been drinking red wine, despite the summer heat. Beaujolais, of course. I’ve written a lot about Beaujolais, so I won’t go into detail here about the various crus – but in addition to a well-made simple Beaujolais – 2022 Château du Basty – we’ve been enjoying a 2022 Chiroubles (Domaine La Grosse Pierre) and a 2019 Brouilly (Domaine Bertrand).
.

It will surprise no one when I say we love Chianti, especially the Classico, especially from coops. Why coops? Because they are making very respectable wines, and usually at very affordable prices. Our current favorite is Clement VII, from Castelli di Grevepesa. Its 2021 Riserva is showing delightful sour cherry fruit in a well-balanced medium body that drinks well with all sorts of antipasto and pasta. When we’ve wanted a touch more elegance – and even in summer we do occasionally want to dine elegantly – the basic vintage bottlings from estates such as Castellare and Volpaia have provided it marvelously at only slightly higher prices.

We drink a lot of Barbera and Dolcetto. I’m very fond of Dolcetto. It’s a wonderfully agreeable wine, and very accommodating to many kinds of food. In the Piedmont, it’s generally regarded as an ideal lunch wine, but it works perfectly with summer dinners too. There are many excellent Dolcetto producers, and most bottles are reasonably priced. We tend to use whatever the market is currently offering: Right now, we’re enjoying Vajra’s 2022 Dolcetto d’Alba, and we also relish Chionetti’s Dogliani, which is 100% Dolcetto from a small, prized zone that has won the right to label its wine with the regional name.

Aglianico is also one of our favorites. The grape that makes Taurasi grows in other parts of Campania as well, and it yields a really fine varietal wine in several of them. It can be surprisingly inexpensive for a grape of such prestige and potential. We usually drink bottles from well-known producers like Donnachiara, Mastroberardino, and Terredora, but there are also fine examples from less famous producers – Ocone, for instance.
.

.
By now you get the idea: We – all of us, not just Diane and I – are afloat in a sea of good wines that happily don’t need a second mortgage to be drunk every day. They may not be as exquisite as some of my treasures, but they provide us – and they can provide you – reliable daily pleasure.

Way back when, just shortly before this ’76 Antoniolo Gattinara was first bottled, I had begun making the acquaintance of Gattinara, and Antoniolo’s was one of the first that I ever tasted. Certainly, in those days Antoniolo was one of the very few Gattinaras that ever made it to the States. Italian wine was just at the beginning of its ascent to respectability and esteem, and one of the people propelling that rise – and certainly the reason that Antoniolo Gattinara was on wineshop shelves here – was a human dynamo named Rossella Antoniolo.

I was fortunate enough to meet Rossella in New York, at an Italian Trade Commission tasting. Later on, Diane and I visited her in Italy, a visit I remember still, for many reasons – some of which I’ll get to later. At that time, Rossella had only recently taken over the winery from her father, and she had a hands-on approach to every aspect of it, from managing the vineyards to vinifying the wines to selling them all over the world. She was what Italians call una donna in gamba. A formidable woman, in English. Charming and tough I thought her, and one hell of a winemaker.

Gattinara was then, and still is, one of the major appellations of the Alta Piemonte, a rugged and beautiful stretch of sub-Alpine hills about midway between Torino and Milano. When Diane and I visited, it was very rural – very. Rossella took us for lunch to what was about the only restaurant in easy driving distance. The menu was entirely of local specialties, and the staff also fell into that category. Rossella had to argue with the proprietor about how to handle her wines. “Eh! Vino e vino,” the owner said with a sniff, and almost caused Rossella to detonate.

But the food was remarkable, as deeply of the hilly, lake-dotted region as one could conceive. So Diane the carnivore wound up making lunch on a mound of pony chops – costelette di cavallino – and I, more (or perhaps less) adventurous, made mine on a mountain of cosce di rana. I have never seen or eaten so many frog’s legs since. Rossella’s wines, already in those days 100% Nebbiolo, were wonderful with both dishes – rich and elegant, leaner than the more familiar Nebbiolo of the Langhe hills, and with a suppleness and strength that indicated they would live long and develop well.

That was about 40 years ago. Now I had in front of me a bottle of Rossella’s 1976 Gattinara. Just plain Gattinara, not a riserva or cru. The estate, now run by Rossella’s son and daughter, these days makes three crus bottlings, all estimable:  Castelle, San Francesco,  and Osso San Grato.

But this was none of those, and I could find out very little about the vintage. In the better-documented Barolo zone, to the southeast of Gattinara, 1976 was a considerably less-than-fine vintage. All the ratings indicated it was now well past its prime and should have been drunk some time ago. That, and the low level of the wine in the bottle – below the neck and into the shoulder – were worrisome. Even more unnerving, when I first touched the cork, it slipped a quarter of an inch down into the bottle. I managed to retrieve it, and it came out whole, but sodden, and the wine smelled very old.

In honor of Rossella, we had prepared a good meal to give the wine every chance to show off: a first course of fettuccine in a creamy mushroom  sauce, followed by a small prime rib roast of beef..\.

.
Not to keep you in suspense: That Gattinara was drinkable, but indeed well past its prime. All the fruit was gone. What remained was a set of mineral and mushroom flavors, sustained still by a remarkable structure of alcohol and acidity that gave it a sort of afterlife. The experience was a little like drinking ghosts – not unpleasant, but certainly strange.

Of all the wines in that small collection I’ve been calling Tom’s Treasures, this one was the first disappointment. All the others, including a fifty-year-old Grignolino, have been wonderful. I have one yet to go, a 1978 Mastroberardino Taurasi. Stay tuned.

OK, so I’m not completely consistent, and I do change my mind from time to time. I like to think of it as admirable intellectual flexibility. I’m aware that just recently I praised simplicity and lightness as virtues of summer dining and drinking. I’ll stand by that: in these very doggy days, I do like simplicity and lightness. But the fact is that, every now and again, whatever the midday temperature, I get a hankering for something a little bit richer and more elaborate. After all, what’s air conditioning for, if we can’t cook and eat something splendid every now and again?

Diane is hardly a person to sniff at something splendid, so she instantly entered the spirit of the moment when I asked her to do something magical with crabmeat. For us, eastern blue claw crab is the prince of all seafood and the very essence of summer.

.
Diane spent many summers of her youth netting crabs from the docks of her family’s Long Island summer fishing shack, and I have early memories of catching crabs with a dip net and a fishhead on a string around Spring Lake, on the Jersey Shore. And then, older and wiser, I lived a few years in Baltimore, where crab in myriad forms is a way of life. The idea of going through one of New York’s tropical summers without a crab treat is almost unbearable to both of us.

So crab it would be. We opted for the wonderful crabmeat crepes that Diane wrote about on her blog some time ago. I’m proud to report that I got my first lessons in making crepes – making them in a pan, not filling and rolling them, which skilled task I wisely left to Diane.
.

.
If we were going to take some trouble with the cooking, then we wanted a wine worthy of the noble crustacean it would accompany. Initially, I’d been thinking that a 15- to 20-year old white Burgundy would be right – but then it struck me that that was almost predictable. Why not try something at least a little unusual?  So I opted for a 12-year old Alsace Pinot gris – a Clos Windsbuhl from Zind-Humbrecht. Bull’s eye!  What a wine that turned out to be!
.

.
Alsace wines are, I think, a vastly undervalued resource. Zind-Humbrecht’s are consistently among the best of them. They showcase a house style of rich, totally dry, mineral-driven fruit that on the palate feels simultaneously soft and steely. These are white wines that take age very well, not transforming but simply (?!) becoming more intensely themselves with each passing year.

Our 2013 bottle showed no sign of tiring. It still had plenty of fresh, mineral-laced fruit, sustained in perfect equilibrium by an ideal balance of acid and alcohol. It was an intriguing amber color, almost looking like an orange wine, which it emphatically was not. My first impression of it was that it was a wine completely serene and almost contemplative – not inducing contemplation in the drinker but contemplative in itself, so complete and harmonious was it.

This Pinot gris drank well with the simple galette of Swiss chard and ricotta cheese that we ate as a first course. It loved those rich crab crepes; and it even got along well with our plum cake dessert, never losing either its direct fruit appeal or its fascinating complexity. Too many people think that Pinot grigio – which, make no mistake, I thoroughly enjoy – sums up what the grape variety can do. That is far from the truth, and Alsace’s rendition of the many, many sides of Pinot gris is an object lesson in the variety’s potential richness and depth.

For meals and wines like this, in weather like this, I bless whatever nameless geniuses invented air conditioning.