I. Introduction
A. Definition of sun setting
Sun setting refers to a planned discontinuation of a service or product, which is gradual and non-intrusive to other parties. In this article, sun setting refers to the idea of discontinuing the celebration of independence day.
The purpose of this post is to spark a conversation about the relevance and impact of independence day in modern times. While the celebration of independence used to symbolize freedom and the rejection of colonization, over the years, the country has become more dependent on the world and the celebration may be doing more harm than good. The post will examine the historical context of independence day, the shift in its relevance, politicians using history as a tool, costs and ego, and the need to move past the blame culture. The conclusion will reflect on the current state of the country and call for a greater future.
II. Historical Context of Independence Day
A. Gain of independence from Britain
Independence Day marks the country’s liberation from British rule in 1948. This event occurred at a time when Britain was focused on World War 2 and its aftermath. In the background, many other countries were also gaining independence from their colonizers.
B. Celebration of freedom and rejection of colonization
The celebration of independence was initially about rejecting colonization, control, and celebrating freedom. It was a symbol of the country’s determination to chart its own path and stand on its own two feet. Over the years, the celebration has been used to commemorate the country’s fight for independence and to remind its citizens of the sacrifices made by their forefathers. The celebration has been an occasion for the country to come together, reflect on its history, and renew its commitment to freedom and independence.
III. The Shift in Relevance
A. Dependence on the world
Over the past 75+ years, the country has become more dependent on the world than ever before. Despite the initial celebration of freedom and independence, the country is now more interdependent with the global community. This shift raises questions about the relevance of independence day and its celebration in modern times.
B. Does the celebration do more harm than good?
As the country continues to evolve, some argue that the celebration of independence day may be doing more harm than good. The constant reminder of the country’s past struggles and dependence on foreign powers may perpetuate a culture of blame and a focus on the past rather than the present and future. Additionally, the celebration of independence day can be costly, both financially and in terms of the country’s ego. These costs and the impact on the country’s sense of independence raise questions about the relevance and value of the celebration in modern times.
IV. Importance of Shifting from Independence to Interdependence
A. Moving past blame culture
Shifting from independence to interdependence is important in order to move past a culture of blame and procrastination. By focusing on the present and future, the country can work towards a greater future, free from the shackles of the past.
B. Building a greater future
Interdependence allows the country to build a greater future, one that is not limited by the constraints of independence. By embracing interdependence, the country can work with other nations and communities to build a better future for all. Interdependence encourages collaboration and cooperation, which can lead to a more prosperous and harmonious future.
C. Embracing the global community
Interdependence also means embracing the global community, recognizing that the country is part of a larger network of nations and communities. By working together, the country can leverage its strengths and resources to achieve greater outcomes for its citizens and the global community. In this way, interdependence represents a step forward for the country, one that is not limited by the constraints of independence but instead, is open to the opportunities of the world.
V. Politicians Using History as a Tool
A. Nationalization and division
Politicians often use historical events, such as independence day, as a tool to nationalize people and divide and conquer. By emphasizing the country’s past struggles and independence, politicians can create a sense of national pride and unity. However, this can also be used to divide the population by emphasizing differences and perpetuating blame culture.
B. Manipulating the population
Politicians can use the celebration of independence day and the emphasis on the country’s history to manipulate the population. By presenting a skewed version of history, politicians can control the narrative and shape public opinion to suit their own interests. This can lead to a distorted view of the country’s history and the perpetuation of myths and misinformation.
C. The danger of a single narrative
The danger of politicians using history as a tool is that it creates a single, dominant narrative that may not reflect the diverse experiences and perspectives of the country’s citizens. This can lead to a distorted view of the country’s history and the marginalization of certain groups and perspectives. By presenting a single, dominant narrative, politicians can control the population and shape public opinion to suit their own interests.
VI. Moving Past the Blame Culture
A. Complain Culture
A complain culture is one where people are more focused on criticizing and pointing out problems than finding solutions. This culture undermines progress and can lead to stagnation. Moving past the blame culture requires breaking out of this complain culture and instead focusing on finding solutions.
B. Procrastination
Procrastination is another aspect of the blame culture that can hinder progress. By blaming past events for present struggles, people may feel a sense of hopelessness and may not take action. Moving past the blame culture requires breaking out of this cycle of procrastination and taking action to make positive change.
C. Focus on Fixing Problems
Moving past the blame culture requires a focus on fixing problems, not just complaining about them. This means taking concrete steps to address the challenges facing the country, and working together to find solutions. By focusing on fixing problems, the country can move forward and build a brighter future for all its citizens.
VII. Planning the Sunset of Independence Day
A. Resistance to the Idea
It’s understandable that there might be resistance to the idea of sunsetting Independence Day. People may have a strong emotional connection to the celebration and view it as a crucial part of their national identity. However, it’s important to consider the long-term benefits of moving past this outdated tradition.
B. Gradual Decline
To minimize resistance and make the transition as smooth as possible, the sunsetting of Independence Day could be gradual, with a target year of 2100. This would allow for a slow and steady decline of the celebration, rather than a sudden discontinuation.
C. Cost-saving Measure
Sunsetting Independence Day can also be seen as a cost-saving measure. The costs associated with the celebration, such as parades and fireworks, can be significant and redirecting these resources towards more pressing issues can have a greater impact on the country.
D. Reduction of Nationalist Rhetoric
Finally, sunsetting Independence Day can also help to reduce nationalist rhetoric. The celebration can sometimes lead to a divisive and exclusive national identity, but sunsetting it can promote a more inclusive and cooperative sense of national identity. By moving past the celebration of independence, the country can focus on building a more interdependent future.