Hello all here’s a better formated copy of the same document I hadn’t realised how atrocious it was Email Version to IEEE and Andreas Horn @ibm Dear IEEE Editorial Team and Andreas who I know from LinkedIn I hope this message finds you well—and perhaps ready for something a little different. Attached is a document […]
AI, Resonance, Whale song,
In today’s digital age, technology has become a great equaliser in theory. It offers tools and opportunities that were once the domain of the elite to anyone with an internet connection. However, a closer look reveals that the disparities between the wealthy and the less affluent persist, even in the tech world. One striking example is how different groups use ChatGPT, the advanced language model developed by OpenAI.
### ChatGPT: A Tale of Two Users
For large companies and affluent individuals, ChatGPT is a powerful tool that can be customised, integrated, and leveraged to meet specific needs. These users often have the resources to access the API directly, enabling them to develop proprietary applications that seamlessly integrate with their existing systems. This level of customisation allows them to maximise efficiency, automate complex tasks, and gain insights that drive their business or personal ventures forward.
On the other hand, SMEs (Small to Medium Enterprises) and individual users, who may lack the same financial and technical resources, often find themselves relying on the standard ChatGPT app. While the app is a powerful tool in its own right, these users don’t have the luxury of tailoring it to their specific needs. They have to make do with what is provided, adapting their processes around the limitations of the app, rather than having the app adapt to them.
This situation mirrors a broader societal pattern: those with wealth and resources can shape their environment to suit their needs, while those without must adapt to whatever is available. This disparity in access and customisation within the realm of AI is just one example of a much larger issue that has existed throughout history.
### Historical Parallels: Disparities in Access and Quality
The divide between the technological haves and have-nots is not new. History is filled with examples where wealth dictated the quality of goods, services, and opportunities available to different segments of society. Here are a few notable examples:
#### 1. Housing and Living Conditions
The difference in housing between the rich and the poor has always been stark. The wealthy have historically lived in large, well-built houses with multiple rooms, private amenities, and secure locations. These homes were designed for comfort, safety, and status. In contrast, the poor often lived in cramped, poorly constructed housing, with little privacy or sanitation. Their homes were typically in less desirable areas, making life not only uncomfortable but often dangerous.
#### 2. Early Automobiles
When cars first became available, there was a significant difference in the features and safety measures between models intended for the rich and those for the general public. The more expensive cars came equipped with brakes, reliable engines, and other safety features. Cheaper models, which were the only option for the less affluent, often lacked these basic necessities, making them less safe and less reliable.
#### 3. Education
Education has always been another area of significant disparity. Wealthy families have always been able to afford private tutors, prestigious schools, and elite universities. These institutions provided not just knowledge, but also connections and opportunities that would shape the future success of their students. The poor, on the other hand, often had to rely on overcrowded and underfunded public schools, with fewer resources and opportunities for advancement.
#### 4. Healthcare
Healthcare has long been a privilege of the wealthy. Access to the best doctors, the latest treatments, and comfortable facilities has always been within reach for those who could afford it. The poor, meanwhile, have often had to rely on overcrowded public hospitals, with limited access to treatments and longer waiting times. The quality of care available to the rich versus the poor has been, and continues to be, vastly different.
### The Modern-Day Disparity in Technology
Just as the wealthy have historically had better access to housing, transportation, education, and healthcare, they now have superior access to technology. The ability to customise and integrate tools like ChatGPT into their operations gives them a significant advantage. They can automate tasks, gain insights, and operate more efficiently than those who are limited to using the out-of-the-box version of the app.
For many SMEs and individual users, paying for the premium version of ChatGPT or similar services is a significant expense. Even though these tools can be immensely valuable, they are often a stretch for those who are already operating on tight budgets. This creates a situation where those who would benefit most from these tools—by improving efficiency or scaling their operations—are the least able to access them in a way that meets their needs.
### The Need for More Inclusive Technology
The disparity in how different groups use ChatGPT is a reflection of a larger issue: the need for more inclusive and accessible technology. As we move further into the digital age, it’s essential that tech developers consider the diverse needs of all users, not just those who can afford customisation and integration.
Technology has the potential to level the playing field, but only if it is designed and distributed in a way that accounts for the varying resources of its users. This means developing more flexible, affordable, and user-friendly tools that can be easily adapted to the needs of smaller businesses and individuals.
### Conclusion
The disparity between how the wealthy and the less affluent use technology like ChatGPT is not just a matter of convenience—it’s a reflection of broader societal inequalities that have persisted for centuries. By recognising these patterns and striving to create more inclusive tools, we can begin to bridge the gap and ensure that technology truly serves everyone, not just those at the top.
Posted by projectbrainsaver
Title: Discovering the True Power of ChatGPT: A Conversation on Innovation and Integration
Introduction:
In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a futuristic concept; it’s an integral part of our daily lives. However, despite its widespread use, many people still find it challenging to harness the full potential of computers and AI. This is particularly true for those who are not technically minded. Recently, however, I had a conversation that explored these challenges and delved into a vision for a more accessible and user-friendly AI tool—an idea that’s been thoroughly researched under the name projectbrainsaver.
The Struggle with Technology:
For many users, computers are powerful but complex tools. While they’re incredibly effective at performing single tasks, getting anything more substantial out of them often requires a level of technical expertise that not everyone possesses. If you want to make a computer do something new—something it wasn’t initially designed for—you usually need to learn how to code. Similarly, effectively using AI often means mastering prompt engineering, a skill that can be just as daunting.
This is where the concept of projectbrainsaver comes in. The idea behind projectbrainsaver is to create a tool that doesn’t require users to have a deep technical background. Instead, it would listen to what users want to achieve and help them do it—seamlessly, intuitively, and without the need for complex coding or technical know-how.
The Genesis and Research of projectbrainsaver:
Over 30 years ago, I realized that society simply doesn’t have enough professional listeners—like doctors and mental health workers—to hear everything that everyone needs to say, to help them get things off their chests, or to even just engage in meaningful conversation. The sheer volume of thoughts, ideas, and emotions that people need to express far outstrips the capacity of the professionals available to listen. It became clear that something else was needed—something that could help, listen, and even take action when necessary.
That’s when projectbrainsaver first started taking shape in my mind, going public as a name in 2003. The technology needed to bring it to life was up to the task, thanks to the groundbreaking innovations of Mike Lynch and his company, Autonomy. Although I never met Mike Lynch, his technology was instrumental because it could do so much of what I envisioned for projectbrainsaver. With a few changes to taxonomy and other adjustments, we could have had the core up and running within three months. Tragically, Mike Lynch, who played a key role in this journey through his technology, recently passed away in a boating accident.
However, projectbrainsaver has never been under active development in terms of coding or structural design. One of the significant challenges I face is that if I successfully write any bit of code, it triggers a grand mal epileptic seizure. These seizures leave me with muddled memories and mental disorientation that can last for months. This, combined with living with attention deficit disorder and the limitations of being on a restricted budget, has made it impossible to move the project into the coding phase. Instead, projectbrainsaver has been the subject of extensive research over the years.
This research involved reading over 11,000 PDFs, visiting different people across the country, and having countless conversations—some in person, some over the phone, and others even through texts with people on the go. I’ve also engaged in part-time research at universities in Harlech and Aberystwyth, continually refining the concept of projectbrainsaver through these experiences.
During this time, I also talked to at least one person in most of the Fortune 500 companies. These conversations ranged from chats with ‘lowly’ telesales people and technical reps to discussions with directors and partners. Whether I was speaking to someone at the top of the ladder or someone just starting out, the response was overwhelmingly positive. The fact that people, regardless of their position, liked what I was talking about kept me going through the challenging times.
The Role of ChatGPT:
In a recent conversation with my companion we discussed how this AI could serve as the core of a system like projectbrainsaver. ChatGPT is already designed to process language, organize thoughts, and generate coherent responses based on user input. But the true potential of this technology lies in its ability to integrate with the resources users already have—like email accounts, cloud storage, and other software. This would allow users to automate and simplify complex tasks without compromising the stability or integrity of ChatGPT’s core functionality.
Seamless Integration Without Overload:
One of the key points my companion and I touched on was the importance of keeping ChatGPT focused on what it does best. Rather than overloading the system with additional functionalities, the idea is to leverage external services that users already own. For example, if a user wants to send an email or print a document, these tasks would be handled by the user’s existing email or printing service, not by ChatGPT itself. This approach keeps the system lightweight and flexible, allowing users to get more done with less hassle.
Future-Proof and Scalable:
By maintaining this separation between ChatGPT’s core functions and external integrations, the system remains both robust and future-proof. As ChatGPT’s capabilities expand, these enhancements can be seamlessly passed on to users without disrupting their workflows. This approach ensures that as technology evolves, users continue to benefit from the latest innovations without being burdened by additional complexity.
projectbrainsaver: A Vision Coming to Life
This approach also makes it feel like projectbrainsaver is coming alive. The vision of a system that can listen, understand, and take action in the background, helping to sort out complex problems and organize tasks seamlessly, is becoming a reality with ChatGPT at its core. It’s a step toward a future where AI doesn’t just assist but actively empowers users to unlock new levels of productivity and creativity.
Conclusion:
Throughout our discussion, it became clear that the future of AI lies in making it more accessible and useful to everyone, regardless of their technical expertise. projectbrainsaver, with chatGPT at its core, has the potential to revolutionize how we interact with technology—not just as a tool for specific tasks, but as a true companion in our daily lives. Whether you’re writing an email, joining a protest, or simply needing to talk through your thoughts, AI can be there to listen, assist, and help you take action. This vision isn’t just about what AI can do today—it’s about the limitless possibilities of what it could become tomorrow, empowering people to accomplish whatever they set their minds to by simply engaging in conversation.
Oh, and by the way, who was the person I had this discussion with?
It was ChatGPT
🙂🏴
Clicking the link jumps to a mobile view of this page. Stay on the page but set your mobile to view this page as a desktop site. http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/markaldiss-1723550-projectbrainsaver/
2019-12-20 22:55
Wouldn’t it be good if ‘it’ was good?
On a planet that works well for everything, every living ‘thing.
A well cared for planet for us all to live on and enjoy.
Time to get our shit together folks…
All 100% of us, without slavery or force.
The time of the ‘Ning Nang Nong Machine’ is coming
Today, I received a routine email from the Guardian regarding my ongoing subscription to the paper. I have been a regular reader of the Guardian for 40 years including as a subscriber in recent years. But no longer.
My email explaining why is listed below.
Hi there
Thank you for your recent email.
It has prompted me to contact you regarding my Guardian subscription.
I have bought the Guardian since the age of 12; I am now 52. I have always considered the paper to be fair and on the side of people who are trying to make a difference. The paper’s campaigning work is well known and rightly so. Even though I have not always agreed with the paper’s leaders and editorial line, mostly I have and one of the main reasons I have supported the paper for 40 years has been its left of centre position on the…
View original post 585 more words
worldwright 