On 21.01.2013 18:17:36, steve donovan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Ildar Mulyukov > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am sorry but this is unacceptable. LUA_PATH by default has the > > .../init.lua so installing this rock may influence users that do not > > intend this module at all. > > I also feel it is _far_ too generic for top-level. > > BTW, if you have an init.lua on your Lua module path then require "" > works ;)
yeah, that's what I suspected.. -- Ildar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
