Life lines, laugh lines, wisdom lines, beautiful lines
yan on second thoughts
Saturday, November 23, 2013
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Art or vendalism
Lego imagery of a
woman walking alone along some back lane where danger may be lurking around the
next turn. (Picture taken from the Zacharevic’s facebook)
INTERNATIONALLY-recognised
street artist Lithuanian-born Ernest Zacharevic has left his mark with
beautiful wall paintings of joyful children all across historical Penang.
In fact, his murals,
mostly featuring children and happiness, especially the Little Children on a bicycle on Armenian Street,
are one of the major tourist attractions in the northern island state.
While having
painted Penang with happiness, he has stepped
on toes in Johor Baru (JB) with a wall painting, depicting the crime and
security situation in JB which was removed by the Johor Town Council on
Wednesday for blowing up a storm – some would say in a tea cup.
A Lego man, wearing
a ski mask and holding a knife in one hand as he looks over his shoulders
towards the corner, awaiting his next victim – a female Lego woman holding a
Chanel handbag walking towards him from the adjoining wall – that’s enough to
send chills down the spine, especially when such a theme has always played on
the minds of Malaysian urbanites.
Why has Zacharevic chosen
to paint such a morbid scene?
He said Johoreans had
alerted him to the crime rate in the state, thus spurring him to draw the
mural.
“Everytime, I asked
the locals if there was anything else other than Legoland I should see in JB,
they whispered to me -- yes, but you have to be careful,” he revealed.
The painting portrays
JB as Legoland since both characters in it are Lego-lised, intended, I suspect, to fully tap the potential of this
popular Danish brand as a tourist attraction for the state.
The painting also casts
JB as a shopping paradise – Chanel
and other branded goods are in abundance.
Above all, it has,
inadvertently or otherwise, dropped a hot potato -- the crime rate in JB – by implying
that danger lurks around every corner of the city streets.
Legal issue like
whether the mural should be in existence without the council’s approval, let’s
ask is the mural appropriate as a city street painting and will it promote goodwill
and good feelings?
For one, it has
triggered a debate on social network. Some think it’s art in bad taste and that
JB deserves better while others sing praises for Zacharevic’s masterpiece (if
you can call it that) and ask for more such murals at high-risk areas to keep
crime at bay.
Maria
Popova, a writer, describes art as “the power to transcend our own self-interest,
our solipsistic zoom lens on life and to relate to the world and each other
with more integrity, more curiosity, more wholeheartedness.”
The first part --
fulfilled by the painting based on Popova’s take on art -- is the transcendence
of self-interest by the artist in favour of public interest as he reminds Johorean
urbanites, through his brushes, palettes, colours and strokes, to be more
careful when they go out as there is
danger lying in wait around every corner.
The second part --
transcending our solipsistic (ego-centric) zoom lens on life -- can perhaps be
interpreted as being ready to face reality -- that there is, indeed, a high
crime rate in JB -- or even Malaysia as a whole.
But can the
painting allow us to relate to the world and each other with more integrity,
more curiosity and more wholeheartedness?
This is what
Zacharevic has to say: “Art will not harm a city’s image, crime will.”
True, JB has been affected
by a high crime rate but as to how many tourists have shunned the city because
of its bad reputation, we have yet to have any official figure.
Will the painting
bring about positive results for tourism? I doubt it. On the contrary, it may
well spawn feelings of insecurity and trepidation and, probably a sense of
anarchy as well.
For some, it brings
back painful memories – if they had fallen victims to robberies and other
violence. In that case, there are other much better ways to send the message
across without raising unnecessary alarm to mar the image of the country.
Will you proudly
hang this picture in your home or allow Zacharevic to paint it on your wall –
in or outside the house?
Some, especially
politicians, said the painting should not be removed. Yes by removing the mural
is no guarantee that the crime situation will improve or crimes will be wiped
out like the painted imagery being washed off.
Johor has other charms
and uniqueness besides Legoland, certainly no less than what Penang
has to offer to tourists. The old part of Johor town -- with its distinctive
red buildings and unique windows -- exudes an ancient appeal that should inspire
many artists. And really, it deserves much better paintings!
Regardless, I have
to say Zacharevic is a true artist who has made a point on the international
scene through his thought-provoking art.
Sarawakians will
certainly welcome him to paint a happy picture or two in our cities and towns
that reflect the harmonious living of the closely knit community that we are
very proud of!
As for the
authorities – city councils, police and Johor state government – they should be
challenged by this piece of art, and together with the people, work towards eradicating
crimes just like how they have whitewashed out the “robber mural.”
Make the state a
model with low crime rate -- that at every turn of a street corner, there is a
Legoman (instead of a cowardly predator) with a bunch of flowers to pleasantly surprise
the womenfolk with a “Chanel” bag.
As Zacharevic
posted on his Facebook shortly after the authorities wiped out his wall
painting: “Don’t get upset by the painting being removed. Johor Baru has proved
to be a strong and opinionated state, please continue to make Malaysia
as awesome as it is.”
That’s probably
explains what Popova meant when she said “the power to relate to the world and
with each other with more integrity, more curiosity and more wholeheartedness.
Saturday, November 16, 2013
When security may not guarantee safety
But
that confidence seems to have been shaken if we go by recent incidents.
Security
guards had hogged the headlines lately or just in the past two weeks. And
looking objectively at the concomitant factors, it may well be just the tip of
the iceberg.
In
a tragic bank robbery, operations officer Noazita Abu Talib, 37, was shot dead at
the AmBank branch in Subang Jaya by the bank’s security guard who later fled
with an undisclosed amount of cash.
In
another robbery, a Filipino security guard of a jewellery shop in Setapak threatened
his colleagues with a pistol before walking off with a tray of gold chains.
He
was later nabbed while waiting to board a plane to Sabah
but his girlfriend, believed to keeping a large stash of the gems, is still at
large.
Both
security guards are reportedly from Sabah and
holding fake MyKads.
At
home, a security guard at a Welfare Department shelter was arrested after two
under-aged female residents lodged police reports, claiming he had raped them.
The guard could also have raped four other under-aged girls staying at the same
shelter.
“We
are supposed to provide a place that can give them a sense of belonging. Yet,
something like this happened when they are under our care. We feel angry,
betrayed and frustrated,” Welfare, Women and Family Development Minister Datuk
Fatimah Abdullah was reported as saying.
According
to the Home Ministry, there are more than 700 security companies hiring over
220,000 guards in the country.
The
Security Services Association Malaysia (SSAM), however, gave a conflicting
figure of over 280,000 -- with 180,000 foreigners working “legally” as security
guards and making up 53 per cent of the total employed in the profession. Illegals
and locals make up the remaining 11 per cent and 36 per cent respectively.
SSAM
Sabah Zone chairman Najmuddin Mohd Ibrahim was quick to point out that the cowardly
acts of the two security guards (allegedly from Sabah)
should not be generalised as being typical of the security service industry nor
labelled as “one bad apple spoiling the whole barrel.”
Najmuddin
who also operates a security service company, said his firm only confirms the
appointment of applicants after a probationary period covering training, physical
and fitness assessment where a pass is compulsory, identity verification and
criminal records checklist.
The
hired security guards will undergo constant training throughout their
employment.
According
to Najmuddin, the successful applicants are not mere guards but, more
importantly, also “trained security officers” who are to be recognised as the
third line of defence after the army and the police. Such a high standard of
professionalism is necessary to earn the confidence and trust of the public.
While
the need to hire competent and honest security personnel should not be
compromised, the point is how could public angst be assuaged when weaknesses and
flaws still managed to get past the verification process in the first place?
SSAM
has already revealed there are known illegal security guards -- 11 per cent of
the total number or 30,800 of them. However, another national newspaper
reported on Nov 6 that there are about 150,000 of the 400,000 security guards
are illegal.
What
are the Home Ministry and SSAM doing about these people? Also, how many of
those classified as “legal” are holding their jobs with fake MyKads?
Immediately
after the incidents involving security guards, Home Minister Datuk Seri Dr
Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said the National Registration Department will conduct a
biometric examination on identification documents of all security personnel in
the country.
It
is already bad enough to know that our security providers are not verified and
cleared of criminal records before we put guns in their hands but what Zahid revealed
is even more disquieting -- that his
ministry has received information certain companies have used security and
firearms-handling licences for other purposes.
He
warned that permits of security companies will be withdrawn if they were found
to have been engaging in activities other than those stated under the licensing
conditions.
He
did not say how long ago he received this lead but announcing it only after the
robberies does imply a seeming indifference to the issue.
So,
now, even companies issued with licence to hire private security guards have
problems – apparently arising from the failure to strictly enforce the rules
and ensure only good agencies are allowed to set up shop.
Surely,
it’s not wise “to mend the fold after some of the sheep have been lost” (Chinese
idiom -- wang yang bu lao)?
Will
the incidents that put a stain on the security service industry serve as a
wake-up call for the Home Ministry and other authorities concerned so that the
victims’ deaths at the hands of desperados masquerading as security guards will
not be in vain?
The
time is ripe for the Home Ministry, the National Registration Department and
the Police to do a thorough background check on the 280,000 security guards in
the country and for the security companies themselves to verify their own
representatives.
Several
politicians and activists in Sabah have alleged there could be as many as 1.5
million unqualified immigrants out there holding Malaysian citizenship
documents issued in Sabah since the 1970’s. It
is time to solve this problem festering in Sabah
once
and for all.
There
is acute urgency to look into the job description of security guards to ensure they
stick to the scope of duties they are engaged to perform.
It’s
no secret that banks are hiring guards to transport piles of cash. Well and
good if this falls within the ambit of their responsibilities but should be
avoided if not contractually spelt out.
Now
is the time to know that not everyone in uniform with a gun can be called a
trained guard.
Now
is the time for SSAM to maintain constant liaison with law enforcement agencies
and keep close tabs on “blacklisted” employees.
Lest
it be overlooked, now is also the time
for security bosses to reward guards who have devoted the best part of their
lives to the company by treating them well so that they will not succumb
to
“makan gaji sahaja” syndrome but will instead go beyond the call of duty while
doing their jobs.
For
after all, wang yang bu lao can also
be taken to mean “it’s never too late to mend.”
To
give credit where it is due, I think I will be plainly out of line if I don’t
put on record the dedication shown by the phalanx of guards in maintaining security
24/7 on the grounds of our work place.
It
is with all sincerity that I appreciate the diligence of the guards both in my
place of stay and at our office.
A delight amidst controversy
IF
there is any delight this week amidst the controversial Allah issue, it would have
to be the baptism of baby Prince
George.
The
media used the word “christening.” But baptism derives from the Bible – and Jesus
was baptised -- no doubt about it.
Christening
is said to be a traditional word which means becoming a member of the Christian
Church, more commonly used by Catholics. But being a Methodist, I stand
corrected.
The
essence of it is that the world witnessed baby Prince George joining the family of the
Church, numbering almost two billion around the world.
The
media in UK called it a
moment of historical significance because as King of England one day, the first-born
of William and Kate will be Supreme Governor of the Church of England, founded
by King Henry VIII in 1534 during the English Reformation -- and Prince George is welcomed
into the Church through his baptism.
The
Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Rev Justin Welby -- as with any other infants’
baptism -- marked the Prince with the sign of the cross on the forehead and
splashed water on his head.
“All
babies are unbelievably special, not only royal babies. But Prince George’s christening does carry an
extra significance.
“As
a nation we are celebrating the birth of someone who, in due course, will be the
Head of State. That’s extraordinary. It gives you a sense of forward-looking,
of the forwardness of history as well as the backwardness of history, and what
a gift to have this new life and to look forward.”
The
Archbishop mentioned three extraordinary things in this baptism.
The
first is baptism, at its heart, is about the gift of God, about God’s gift of
life, not just ordinary physical life but also the offer of spiritual life to
all of us – so eternal life.
The
second is the extraordinary moment because that is the sign by which we
understand this person belongs to God.
And
the third is Welby’s message for Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, George’s
parents.
“My
message to them would be what a treat, what an amazing gift, what wonderful
times that you will have. There will be great times and tough times -- there
always are with children. Through christening, you are bringing God into the
middle of it all and I know when He is in the middle of it all, somehow it is
held in his hands, and that is extraordinary.”
Welby
undoubtedly said something more than a royal
speech – he hopes the baptism of Prince
George will inspire others to seek the same ceremony.
The
Duke and Duchess of Cambridge
are known as global trend-setters, capable of influencing the world in buying
habits and fashion trends.
It
isn’t clear whether baptism will become a trend too. But many people are
holding high hopes that this will be a “trend.”
Rev
Chris Howson, priest at Sunderland,
UK, believing
that baptism is a way to give thanks for a new creation, said the royal couple
had given their three-month-old son the greatest gift a parent can give a
child.
Reports
said that baptisms in the Church of England have been cut in half since 1980,
and in Canada,
the number of baptisms by the United Church of Canada has dropped to around
6,000 from 32,000 over the same period. In the US, baptism rates are at 60-year
lows in some churches.
Tom Archer-Mills, chair of the British
Monarchist Society, also believes Prince
George’s christening will prompt discussions about
christenings.
He said something beyond the christening
too: “Even with increased immigration and a diverse population, all religions
can relate to the service.
“Each religion has its own rite of passage.
I hope by the time Prince George takes the
throne, he will be the defender of the faith which will encompass all of the
religions of the United
Kingdom.”
Parenting takes hard work with huge challenges.
In christening ceremony, godparents are chosen for the baby. With seven
godparents named, each taking a particular interest in the upbringing of the
prince, William and Kate can be completely certain they have many by their side
in their parenting path.
It should not be a wasted wish to hope that
the world will follow William and Kate’s decision – bringing their babies to
the teachings of the Bible and naming good godparents for parental support and
for the growing child to look up to in times of difficulties.
By the grace of God, there is something to
look forward in our next generations that when by the time they grow up, they
will be the defenders of truths and faiths that encompass all religions, and
excellently –
In essentials, unity
In doubtful things, liberty
In all things, give thanks to God.
Turning the other cheek
NO aspect of
Christian faith warms my heart more than knowing God is my Father. Whether I am
in joy, sorrow, tears, laugher or fear, when I come to my Father in prayers or
at worship services with the utterance of My
God, there is always a warm feeling that passes through my body.
It is an
inexpressible joy to know I have a God who loves me and listens to my every
prayer.
I believe the same hope and faith is found in every Christian who calls out to God, whether they call Him God, Abba, Lord or Allah.
The Christian
Federation of Malaysia said 60 per cent of the approximately 2.6 million
Christians in the country use the word Allah
to refer to God.
This means with the
ruling of the Court of Appeal, about 1.6 million Christians in the country,
made up mostly of indigenous people from Sarawak and Sabah,
will have to call out to their Father in heaven in a different way -- whether
in prayers, praises, worship or reading their Bible and Christian literature.
It also means those
natives who have used Bahasa Malaysia
in their worship in addition to their native tongue and who, for calling their
God Allah, are turned instantly into
law breakers without breaking any laws in the very land where they are the sons
of soil.
It has deeper
implication - that our rights as citizens to freedom of worship have been
curtailed by the verdict of the Court of Appeal.
What will the impact be
on inter-faith relations? Will they become more tense, noting the ever stronger
reactions from Sarawak and Sabah even with the Prime Minister breaking his silence
to assure these two East Malaysian states are allowed to continue using Allah.
The “righteous anger”
was communicated by the people of the two states, starting from the Most Revd
Datuk Bolly Lapok, the Anglican Archbishop for the Province of Southeast Asia
and the Bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Kuching, to politicians, lawyers and
ordinary citizens.
Allah is a generic
term used by Bumiputra Christians in their personal and public prayers,
worship, preaching and everyday life. Without it, our Bahasa Malaysia speaking
Christians cannot even pray properly.
My colleague, a
senior journalist and a former priest who has travelled far and wide, said: “I
come to understand that many Arab countries and others, es-pecially Malta which
is known for its early record of being Christianised by St Paul in early days
of Christianity -- are using Allah to
call God. This historical fact strengthens the wide claim that the use of Allah in Christianity predates Islam.”
It is a traumatic
experience to be called “criminals” or “law breakers” for using Allah in order not to confuse other
people using the same word. It has never been an issue for many generations, much
less the cause of any social or national security problems both inside and
outside Malaysia.
According to the National
Evangelical Christian Fellowship (NECF), in the states of Sarawak and Sabah
where Allah is most widely used by
BM-speaking Christians who outnumber the Christians in peninsular Malaysia,
JAKIM statistics show between 1990 and 2001,11,818 Sabahans and 9,603 Sarawa-kians
converted to Islam. This means these two states have the highest number of
Muslim converts by far than any of the other states in Malaysia.
COA ruling is a slap
on our right cheek! How does one strike another on the right cheek? A blow by
the right fist in this predominantly right-handed world would land on the left
cheek.
Striking the right
cheek with the right hand is only possible when the back of the hand – or using
the left hand, which, incidentally, was an insult in Jewish society of yore.
We are familiar with
the biblical teaching of “turning the other cheek.” The person who turns the
other cheek is, in essence, saying: “Try again, your first blow failed to
achieve its intended effect. I deny you the power to humiliate me and demean
me.”
Christians should
insist on integrity, justice and the pursuit of the values of their teaching of
non-violence by turning the other cheek which is non-violent and resistant,
cheeky and openly subversive to injustices.
We can be non-violent
and still act and speak in ways that resist and undermine falsehood and unjust
power.
And that, I believe,
is a good part of what Jesus is after in this “turn your other cheek.”
The measured
statement of Bishop Bolly who was a member of the team at the inter-faith
dialogue between the worldwide Anglican Communion and Al Azhar University in Cairo,
reflected that inter-faith courtesy and integrity that transcend local
politics.
In fact, many of our
leaders -- whether from the ruling government or the opposition -- have largely
main-tained their equanimity and sensibility over an extremely contentious issue
in the past week by “tur-ning the other cheek.”
For one, The Borneo
Post also brought our Senior Minister Tan Sri James Masing, a Christian minister,
to the in-ternational scene. He was quoted in Los Angeles Times as saying he
was saddened by the ruling and warned the Malaysian government “must not politicise
religion.”
Later, Masing also
said for him, the assurance by the federal cabinet that Sarawak and Sabah can
use Allah in their worship and text
but not peninsular Malaysia
is not satisfactory.
“It means one nation
with two religious definitions,” he pointed out.
Batu Lintang assemblyman
See Chee How has also “turned the other cheek” on the ruling and further asked whether
Sarawakians could turn a blind eye to the injustice and prejudice suffered by
their fellow countrymen and women living in Peninsular Malaysia, considering
“they are no lesser Christians than everybody else.”
See said Sarawakians,
in sharing the same destiny as all the citizens in the peninsula and Sabah,
should speak up on this injustice, and leverage on the state's position as the kingmaker in the country to stop the prejudice
against Christians in Malaysia.
“We should all stand
together with our Christian brothers and sisters in Peninsular Malaysia so that
the ban on the word Allah in The
Herald can come to an end soon with the federal court making a decision.”
By turning the other
cheek, we are pressing on to the power who had slapped our right cheek that religious bigotry, racism and
extremism should not be perpetuated and allowed to fester and poison our
nation.
.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


