Unfortunately, science taught in our high schools and universities is the purported fact that the vast sedimentary rock strata which compose most of the geologic column on the continents were deposited during multiple transgressions and regressions of the ocean, on and off the continents, through hundreds of millions of years, but is there really evidence of multiple transgressions and regressions?  If this had been, then why are there no ancient soil horizons within the geologic column, which should have been covered by the subsequent sedimentary transgressions of the ocean? 

And what caused the ocean level to supposedly rise and fall (or the continents sink and rise), many times, with the ocean water reaching to the middle of continents, to have caused the entombment of billions of fossils within sedimentary layers which often extend across entire continents (with many of the layers grading into each other as if deposited from one catastrophe)?

Besides the obvious evidence that the sedimentary (meaning layered in water) rock column was indeed caused by the ocean having layed down those sequential, mostly flay-lying (except in the mountians), deposits on the continents, what other evidence do we have that the sea level has risen in the past? 

There are hundreds of sites of submerged bronze age ruins on the continental shelf in many parts of the world, such as off the coast of Lebanon, Greece, Spain, India, and Japan, submerged since the end of the Ice Age, when sea level rose about three hundred feet to cover about twenty million square miles of low elevation land, but the Ice Age(“s”) supposedly began about ten million years ago (“for no known reason”), while the deepest sedimentary rocks on the continents are supposedly hundreds of millions of years old, so the mainstream scientists can’t say ice age sea level fluctuations were responsible, and even then, the sea level fluctuation of several hundred feet would not nearly be enough to reach the continental interiors for sediment deposition, so this cannot be their rationale.

And mainstream geologists don’t have any other possible reason (that sea level rose and fell supposedly many times), but the global flood model fills the bill, as you read on in the free ebook download of my first book, Old Earth? Why Not!, learning that the mountains rose at the close of Noah’s Flood, and that only a paradoxically warmer ocean could have been the engine for the Ice Age (as you can also learn under category Catastrophic Climate Change).  And lest you think there is really know intelligent design of the universe, then checkout article #2 at http://iceagecivilizations.com, explaining how they surveyed the dimensions for the Great Pyramid of Giza according to measures of the wobble rate, 72 years/degree, of the earth’s axis.

Keep in mind that there are hundreds of ancient legends about the global Flood, written like a ship’s log in the Genesis account, the first book of the Bible, which relates much about the beginnings of the universe and earth, and the generations of mankind in the early days, with all but the six days of creation recorded by eyewitnesses, as explained in article #13 at http://genesisveracity.com, so you can see that the Bible really makes alot of sense, particularly when compared to the lame hypotheses of those who would try to disprove it.  See too http://genesisveracityfoundation.com and http://globalflood.org.

David Quammen wrote a glowing piece for National Geographic about Charles Darwin, how he supposedly has set the bible believers of the world straight regarding the true nature of biological history, but Quammen creates the strawman argument that the Christians of Darwin’s time believed that God created the giant ice age armadillos, sloths, and anteaters (remains of which were discovered by Darwin in South America), and then, after their extinctions, God supposedly created the smaller versions of the present day, the last in a long series of creations which Quammen says creationists believed to have occurred, and so (as Quammen’s story goes), Darwin correctly linked genetically the ice age creatures with the smaller present day versions, while the creationists didn’t.

But creationists, at least the ones who believe what the book of Genesis actually says (young earth creationism), know that Darwin’s term species is meaningless, and as Darwin probably knew this too, he didn’t even try to define it himself, saying only that “scientists will know what they mean when they use the term,” proving that Darwin may have known that his theory was a fraud from the very beginning, but followed through on his scheme in defiance of his christian upbringing, coming to supposedly believe that all the creatures morphed over time from swamp goo or some such.

That large ice age animals became smaller with the climate change accompanying the drastic drop in precipitation rates with its end is really no biological surprise, and certainly not indicative of darwinian evolution, as Darwin and Quammen claim, but only natural selection, however, not within species (whatever that means), but within syngameons, such as the sloth syngameon of animals, otherwise known as a biblical kind of animal, demonstrating that only thousands of kinds/syngameons of animals, not millions of “species,” need have been on Noah’s Ark, proving that Genesis history matches what is noted in the world of biology, as well as, in geology, astronomy, hydrology, and archaeology, elablorated upon in the free ebook download of my first book, Old Earth? Why Not!

Hybridization within the deer syngameon is a classic example of the foolishness of the darwinian species system, as hundreds of so-called species of deer exist in the world, all common at the family level on the darwinian phylogenetic tree, and I would bet that all of them are genetically capable of interbreeding with each other, proving that they are of one syngameon, not may species, because they are all reproductively viable, the true marker between kinds of animals, not Darwin’s species, which escaped even his definition, the dead giveaway that the theory has no scientific legs.

And be sure to see http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.