Incremental transaction execution

[danyalprout]

Currently we execute all transactions for all Flashblocks within a block when we receive a new Flashblock (code). We should optimize this to store the state and only execute transactions from new Flashblocks.

[cliff0412]

with flashblock, does normal eth_sendRawTransaction co exist with flashblock? can user send transactions to the mempool? if so, will this affect the execution of flashblocks?

[danyalprout]

does normal eth_sendRawTransaction co exist with flashblock

Yes

can user send transactions to the mempool

Yes

if so, will this affect the execution of flashblocks?

Not quite sure what you mean by this

[cliff0412]

does normal eth_sendRawTransaction co exist with flashblock

Yes

can user send transactions to the mempool

Yes

if so, will this affect the execution of flashblocks?

Not quite sure what you mean by this

for example, the node receives flashblocks fb_0, fb_1, ..., fb_i,... fb_n from subscription; and before receiving fb_i, where 0<i<n, the node receive user transaction tx from eth_sendRawTransaction. how this user tx to be executed and included in a block?

[danyalprout]

The transaction is sent to the Base mempool by the node.

We run a builder, which will include this transaction in a Flashblock and then broadcast the Flashblocks to the nodes

[danyalprout]

Fixed in #66